Radiation dose metrics in CT: Assessing dose using the national quality forum CT patient safety measure

Jillian Keegan, Diana L Miglioretti, Robert Gould, Lane F. Donnelly, Nicole D. Wilson, Rebecca Smith-Bindman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose The National Quality Forum (NQF) is a nonprofit consensus organization that recently endorsed a measure focused on CT radiation doses. To comply, facilities must summarize the doses from consecutive scans within age and anatomic area strata and report the data in the medical record. Our purpose was to assess the time needed to assemble the data and to demonstrate how review of such data permits a facility to understand doses. Methods and Materials To assemble the data we used for analysis, we used the dose monitoring software eXposure to automatically export dose metrics from consecutive scans in 2010 and 2012. For a subset of 50 exams, we also collected dose metrics manually, copying data directly from the PACS into an excel spreadsheet. Results Manual data collection for 50 scans required 2 hours and 15 minutes. eXposure compiled the data in under an hour. All dose metrics demonstrated a 30% to 50% reduction between 2010 and 2012. There was also a significant decline and a reduction in the variability of the doses over time. Conclusion The NQF measure facilitates an institution's capacity to assess the doses they are using for CT as part of routine practice. The necessary data can be collected within a reasonable amount of time either with automatic software or manually. The collection and review of these data will allow facilities to compare their radiation dose distributions with national distributions and allow assessment of temporal trends in the doses they are using.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-315
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
Radiation
Software
Nonprofit Organizations
Medical Records

Keywords

  • CT
  • dose metrics
  • quality improvement
  • radiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Radiation dose metrics in CT : Assessing dose using the national quality forum CT patient safety measure. / Keegan, Jillian; Miglioretti, Diana L; Gould, Robert; Donnelly, Lane F.; Wilson, Nicole D.; Smith-Bindman, Rebecca.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2014, p. 309-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Keegan, Jillian ; Miglioretti, Diana L ; Gould, Robert ; Donnelly, Lane F. ; Wilson, Nicole D. ; Smith-Bindman, Rebecca. / Radiation dose metrics in CT : Assessing dose using the national quality forum CT patient safety measure. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2014 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 309-315.
@article{79e57e12ae404c168c841c77de260019,
title = "Radiation dose metrics in CT: Assessing dose using the national quality forum CT patient safety measure",
abstract = "Purpose The National Quality Forum (NQF) is a nonprofit consensus organization that recently endorsed a measure focused on CT radiation doses. To comply, facilities must summarize the doses from consecutive scans within age and anatomic area strata and report the data in the medical record. Our purpose was to assess the time needed to assemble the data and to demonstrate how review of such data permits a facility to understand doses. Methods and Materials To assemble the data we used for analysis, we used the dose monitoring software eXposure to automatically export dose metrics from consecutive scans in 2010 and 2012. For a subset of 50 exams, we also collected dose metrics manually, copying data directly from the PACS into an excel spreadsheet. Results Manual data collection for 50 scans required 2 hours and 15 minutes. eXposure compiled the data in under an hour. All dose metrics demonstrated a 30{\%} to 50{\%} reduction between 2010 and 2012. There was also a significant decline and a reduction in the variability of the doses over time. Conclusion The NQF measure facilitates an institution's capacity to assess the doses they are using for CT as part of routine practice. The necessary data can be collected within a reasonable amount of time either with automatic software or manually. The collection and review of these data will allow facilities to compare their radiation dose distributions with national distributions and allow assessment of temporal trends in the doses they are using.",
keywords = "CT, dose metrics, quality improvement, radiation",
author = "Jillian Keegan and Miglioretti, {Diana L} and Robert Gould and Donnelly, {Lane F.} and Wilson, {Nicole D.} and Rebecca Smith-Bindman",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "309--315",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiation dose metrics in CT

T2 - Assessing dose using the national quality forum CT patient safety measure

AU - Keegan, Jillian

AU - Miglioretti, Diana L

AU - Gould, Robert

AU - Donnelly, Lane F.

AU - Wilson, Nicole D.

AU - Smith-Bindman, Rebecca

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose The National Quality Forum (NQF) is a nonprofit consensus organization that recently endorsed a measure focused on CT radiation doses. To comply, facilities must summarize the doses from consecutive scans within age and anatomic area strata and report the data in the medical record. Our purpose was to assess the time needed to assemble the data and to demonstrate how review of such data permits a facility to understand doses. Methods and Materials To assemble the data we used for analysis, we used the dose monitoring software eXposure to automatically export dose metrics from consecutive scans in 2010 and 2012. For a subset of 50 exams, we also collected dose metrics manually, copying data directly from the PACS into an excel spreadsheet. Results Manual data collection for 50 scans required 2 hours and 15 minutes. eXposure compiled the data in under an hour. All dose metrics demonstrated a 30% to 50% reduction between 2010 and 2012. There was also a significant decline and a reduction in the variability of the doses over time. Conclusion The NQF measure facilitates an institution's capacity to assess the doses they are using for CT as part of routine practice. The necessary data can be collected within a reasonable amount of time either with automatic software or manually. The collection and review of these data will allow facilities to compare their radiation dose distributions with national distributions and allow assessment of temporal trends in the doses they are using.

AB - Purpose The National Quality Forum (NQF) is a nonprofit consensus organization that recently endorsed a measure focused on CT radiation doses. To comply, facilities must summarize the doses from consecutive scans within age and anatomic area strata and report the data in the medical record. Our purpose was to assess the time needed to assemble the data and to demonstrate how review of such data permits a facility to understand doses. Methods and Materials To assemble the data we used for analysis, we used the dose monitoring software eXposure to automatically export dose metrics from consecutive scans in 2010 and 2012. For a subset of 50 exams, we also collected dose metrics manually, copying data directly from the PACS into an excel spreadsheet. Results Manual data collection for 50 scans required 2 hours and 15 minutes. eXposure compiled the data in under an hour. All dose metrics demonstrated a 30% to 50% reduction between 2010 and 2012. There was also a significant decline and a reduction in the variability of the doses over time. Conclusion The NQF measure facilitates an institution's capacity to assess the doses they are using for CT as part of routine practice. The necessary data can be collected within a reasonable amount of time either with automatic software or manually. The collection and review of these data will allow facilities to compare their radiation dose distributions with national distributions and allow assessment of temporal trends in the doses they are using.

KW - CT

KW - dose metrics

KW - quality improvement

KW - radiation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895466883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895466883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 24589407

AN - SCOPUS:84895466883

VL - 11

SP - 309

EP - 315

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 3

ER -