Race and Reproductive Coercion: A Qualitative Assessment

Cara Nikolajski, Elizabeth Miller, Heather L. McCauley, Aletha Akers, Eleanor Schwarz, Lori Freedman, Julia Steinberg, Said Ibrahim, Sonya Borrero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Unintended pregnancy is common and disproportionately occurs among low-income and African-American (AA) women. Male partners may influence women's risk of unintended pregnancy through reproductive coercion, although studies have not assessed whether racial differences in reproductive coercion impact AA women's disparate risk for unintended pregnancy. We sought to describe women's experiences with pregnancy-promoting behaviors by male partners and explore differences in such experiences by race. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with low-income, AA and White women aged 18 to 45 years recruited from reproductive health clinics in Western Pennsylvania to explore contextual factors that shape women's contraceptive behaviors. Narratives were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method. Findings: Among the 66 participants (36 AA and 30 White), 25 (38%) described experiences with male partner reproductive coercion. Narratives provided accounts of contraceptive sabotage, verbal pressure to promote pregnancy and specific pregnancy outcomes, and potential motives behind these behaviors. AA women in the sample reported experiences of reproductive coercion more often than White women (53% and 20%, respectively). AA women were also more likely than White women to attribute a current or prior pregnancy to reproductive coercion. AA women identified relationship transiency and impending incarceration as potential motivations for men to secure a connection with a female partner via pregnancy. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that reproductive coercion may be a factor contributing to disparities in unintended pregnancy. More research, including population-level studies, is needed to determine the impact of reproductive coercion on unintended pregnancy and to understand the social and structural factors associated with pregnancy-promoting behaviors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)216-223
Number of pages8
JournalWomen's Health Issues
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Coercion
pregnancy
African Americans
Pregnancy
contraceptive
experience
low income
Contraception Behavior
sabotage
narrative
demographic situation
Reproductive Health
Pregnancy Outcome
Contraceptive Agents
American
Motivation
content analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Maternity and Midwifery
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Nikolajski, C., Miller, E., McCauley, H. L., Akers, A., Schwarz, E., Freedman, L., ... Borrero, S. (2015). Race and Reproductive Coercion: A Qualitative Assessment. Women's Health Issues, 25(3), 216-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2014.12.004

Race and Reproductive Coercion : A Qualitative Assessment. / Nikolajski, Cara; Miller, Elizabeth; McCauley, Heather L.; Akers, Aletha; Schwarz, Eleanor; Freedman, Lori; Steinberg, Julia; Ibrahim, Said; Borrero, Sonya.

In: Women's Health Issues, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.05.2015, p. 216-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nikolajski, C, Miller, E, McCauley, HL, Akers, A, Schwarz, E, Freedman, L, Steinberg, J, Ibrahim, S & Borrero, S 2015, 'Race and Reproductive Coercion: A Qualitative Assessment', Women's Health Issues, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 216-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2014.12.004
Nikolajski C, Miller E, McCauley HL, Akers A, Schwarz E, Freedman L et al. Race and Reproductive Coercion: A Qualitative Assessment. Women's Health Issues. 2015 May 1;25(3):216-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2014.12.004
Nikolajski, Cara ; Miller, Elizabeth ; McCauley, Heather L. ; Akers, Aletha ; Schwarz, Eleanor ; Freedman, Lori ; Steinberg, Julia ; Ibrahim, Said ; Borrero, Sonya. / Race and Reproductive Coercion : A Qualitative Assessment. In: Women's Health Issues. 2015 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 216-223.
@article{079e8035d05047148337c07a0757881e,
title = "Race and Reproductive Coercion: A Qualitative Assessment",
abstract = "Background: Unintended pregnancy is common and disproportionately occurs among low-income and African-American (AA) women. Male partners may influence women's risk of unintended pregnancy through reproductive coercion, although studies have not assessed whether racial differences in reproductive coercion impact AA women's disparate risk for unintended pregnancy. We sought to describe women's experiences with pregnancy-promoting behaviors by male partners and explore differences in such experiences by race. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with low-income, AA and White women aged 18 to 45 years recruited from reproductive health clinics in Western Pennsylvania to explore contextual factors that shape women's contraceptive behaviors. Narratives were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method. Findings: Among the 66 participants (36 AA and 30 White), 25 (38{\%}) described experiences with male partner reproductive coercion. Narratives provided accounts of contraceptive sabotage, verbal pressure to promote pregnancy and specific pregnancy outcomes, and potential motives behind these behaviors. AA women in the sample reported experiences of reproductive coercion more often than White women (53{\%} and 20{\%}, respectively). AA women were also more likely than White women to attribute a current or prior pregnancy to reproductive coercion. AA women identified relationship transiency and impending incarceration as potential motivations for men to secure a connection with a female partner via pregnancy. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that reproductive coercion may be a factor contributing to disparities in unintended pregnancy. More research, including population-level studies, is needed to determine the impact of reproductive coercion on unintended pregnancy and to understand the social and structural factors associated with pregnancy-promoting behaviors.",
author = "Cara Nikolajski and Elizabeth Miller and McCauley, {Heather L.} and Aletha Akers and Eleanor Schwarz and Lori Freedman and Julia Steinberg and Said Ibrahim and Sonya Borrero",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.whi.2014.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "216--223",
journal = "Women's Health Issues",
issn = "1049-3867",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Race and Reproductive Coercion

T2 - A Qualitative Assessment

AU - Nikolajski, Cara

AU - Miller, Elizabeth

AU - McCauley, Heather L.

AU - Akers, Aletha

AU - Schwarz, Eleanor

AU - Freedman, Lori

AU - Steinberg, Julia

AU - Ibrahim, Said

AU - Borrero, Sonya

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Background: Unintended pregnancy is common and disproportionately occurs among low-income and African-American (AA) women. Male partners may influence women's risk of unintended pregnancy through reproductive coercion, although studies have not assessed whether racial differences in reproductive coercion impact AA women's disparate risk for unintended pregnancy. We sought to describe women's experiences with pregnancy-promoting behaviors by male partners and explore differences in such experiences by race. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with low-income, AA and White women aged 18 to 45 years recruited from reproductive health clinics in Western Pennsylvania to explore contextual factors that shape women's contraceptive behaviors. Narratives were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method. Findings: Among the 66 participants (36 AA and 30 White), 25 (38%) described experiences with male partner reproductive coercion. Narratives provided accounts of contraceptive sabotage, verbal pressure to promote pregnancy and specific pregnancy outcomes, and potential motives behind these behaviors. AA women in the sample reported experiences of reproductive coercion more often than White women (53% and 20%, respectively). AA women were also more likely than White women to attribute a current or prior pregnancy to reproductive coercion. AA women identified relationship transiency and impending incarceration as potential motivations for men to secure a connection with a female partner via pregnancy. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that reproductive coercion may be a factor contributing to disparities in unintended pregnancy. More research, including population-level studies, is needed to determine the impact of reproductive coercion on unintended pregnancy and to understand the social and structural factors associated with pregnancy-promoting behaviors.

AB - Background: Unintended pregnancy is common and disproportionately occurs among low-income and African-American (AA) women. Male partners may influence women's risk of unintended pregnancy through reproductive coercion, although studies have not assessed whether racial differences in reproductive coercion impact AA women's disparate risk for unintended pregnancy. We sought to describe women's experiences with pregnancy-promoting behaviors by male partners and explore differences in such experiences by race. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with low-income, AA and White women aged 18 to 45 years recruited from reproductive health clinics in Western Pennsylvania to explore contextual factors that shape women's contraceptive behaviors. Narratives were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method. Findings: Among the 66 participants (36 AA and 30 White), 25 (38%) described experiences with male partner reproductive coercion. Narratives provided accounts of contraceptive sabotage, verbal pressure to promote pregnancy and specific pregnancy outcomes, and potential motives behind these behaviors. AA women in the sample reported experiences of reproductive coercion more often than White women (53% and 20%, respectively). AA women were also more likely than White women to attribute a current or prior pregnancy to reproductive coercion. AA women identified relationship transiency and impending incarceration as potential motivations for men to secure a connection with a female partner via pregnancy. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that reproductive coercion may be a factor contributing to disparities in unintended pregnancy. More research, including population-level studies, is needed to determine the impact of reproductive coercion on unintended pregnancy and to understand the social and structural factors associated with pregnancy-promoting behaviors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929134005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929134005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.whi.2014.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.whi.2014.12.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 25748823

AN - SCOPUS:84929134005

VL - 25

SP - 216

EP - 223

JO - Women's Health Issues

JF - Women's Health Issues

SN - 1049-3867

IS - 3

ER -