Quantitative Assessment of Knee Progression Angle During Gait in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Jon Davids, Nina Q. Cung, Robin Pomeroy, Brooke Schultz, Leslie Torburn, Vedant A. Kulkarni, Sean Brown, Anita M. Bagley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Abnormal hip rotation is a common deviation in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Clinicians typically assess hip rotation during gait by observing the direction that the patella points relative to the path of walking, which is referred to as the knee progression angle (KPA). Two kinematic methods for calculating the KPA are compared with each other. Video-based qualitative assessment of KPA is compared with the quantitative methods to determine reliability and validity. Methods: The KPA was calculated by both direct and indirect methods for 32 typically developing (TD) children and a convenience cohort of 43 children with hemiplegic type CP. An additional convenience cohort of 26 children with hemiplegic type CP was selected for qualitative assessment of KPA, performed by 3 experienced clinicians, using 3 categories (internal, >10 degrees; neutral, −10 to 10 degrees; and external, >−10 degrees). Results: Root mean square (RMS) analysis comparing the direct and indirect KPAs was 1.14+0.43 degrees for TD children, and 1.75+1.54 degrees for the affected side of children with CP. The difference in RMS among the 2 groups was statistically, but not clinically, significant (P=0.019). Intraclass correlation coefficient revealed excellent agreement between the direct and indirect methods of KPA for TD and CP children (0.996 and 0.992, respectively; P<0.001). For the qualitative assessment of KPA there was complete agreement among all examiners for 17 of 26 cases (65%). Direct KPA matched for 49 of 78 observations (63%) and indirect KPA matched for 52 of 78 observations (67%). Conclusions: The RMS analysis of direct and indirect methods for KPA was statistically but not clinically significant, which supports the use of either method based upon availability. Video-based qualitative assessment of KPA showed moderate reliability and validity. The differences between observed and calculated KPA indicate the need for caution when relying on visual assessments for clinical interpretation, and demonstrate the value of adding KPA calculation to standard kinematic analysis. Level of Evidence:: Level II—diagnostic test.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 31 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cerebral Palsy
Gait
Knee
Biomechanical Phenomena
Reproducibility of Results
Hip
Patella
Walking

Keywords

  • cerebral palsy
  • gait
  • knee progression angle
  • quantitative assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Quantitative Assessment of Knee Progression Angle During Gait in Children With Cerebral Palsy. / Davids, Jon; Cung, Nina Q.; Pomeroy, Robin; Schultz, Brooke; Torburn, Leslie; Kulkarni, Vedant A.; Brown, Sean; Bagley, Anita M.

In: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 31.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davids, Jon ; Cung, Nina Q. ; Pomeroy, Robin ; Schultz, Brooke ; Torburn, Leslie ; Kulkarni, Vedant A. ; Brown, Sean ; Bagley, Anita M. / Quantitative Assessment of Knee Progression Angle During Gait in Children With Cerebral Palsy. In: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2018.
@article{ea644354ecb7475fba088f8bd8ff95db,
title = "Quantitative Assessment of Knee Progression Angle During Gait in Children With Cerebral Palsy",
abstract = "Background: Abnormal hip rotation is a common deviation in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Clinicians typically assess hip rotation during gait by observing the direction that the patella points relative to the path of walking, which is referred to as the knee progression angle (KPA). Two kinematic methods for calculating the KPA are compared with each other. Video-based qualitative assessment of KPA is compared with the quantitative methods to determine reliability and validity. Methods: The KPA was calculated by both direct and indirect methods for 32 typically developing (TD) children and a convenience cohort of 43 children with hemiplegic type CP. An additional convenience cohort of 26 children with hemiplegic type CP was selected for qualitative assessment of KPA, performed by 3 experienced clinicians, using 3 categories (internal, >10 degrees; neutral, −10 to 10 degrees; and external, >−10 degrees). Results: Root mean square (RMS) analysis comparing the direct and indirect KPAs was 1.14+0.43 degrees for TD children, and 1.75+1.54 degrees for the affected side of children with CP. The difference in RMS among the 2 groups was statistically, but not clinically, significant (P=0.019). Intraclass correlation coefficient revealed excellent agreement between the direct and indirect methods of KPA for TD and CP children (0.996 and 0.992, respectively; P<0.001). For the qualitative assessment of KPA there was complete agreement among all examiners for 17 of 26 cases (65{\%}). Direct KPA matched for 49 of 78 observations (63{\%}) and indirect KPA matched for 52 of 78 observations (67{\%}). Conclusions: The RMS analysis of direct and indirect methods for KPA was statistically but not clinically significant, which supports the use of either method based upon availability. Video-based qualitative assessment of KPA showed moderate reliability and validity. The differences between observed and calculated KPA indicate the need for caution when relying on visual assessments for clinical interpretation, and demonstrate the value of adding KPA calculation to standard kinematic analysis. Level of Evidence:: Level II—diagnostic test.",
keywords = "cerebral palsy, gait, knee progression angle, quantitative assessment",
author = "Jon Davids and Cung, {Nina Q.} and Robin Pomeroy and Brooke Schultz and Leslie Torburn and Kulkarni, {Vedant A.} and Sean Brown and Bagley, {Anita M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1097/BPO.0000000000001134",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics",
issn = "0271-6798",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative Assessment of Knee Progression Angle During Gait in Children With Cerebral Palsy

AU - Davids, Jon

AU - Cung, Nina Q.

AU - Pomeroy, Robin

AU - Schultz, Brooke

AU - Torburn, Leslie

AU - Kulkarni, Vedant A.

AU - Brown, Sean

AU - Bagley, Anita M.

PY - 2018/1/31

Y1 - 2018/1/31

N2 - Background: Abnormal hip rotation is a common deviation in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Clinicians typically assess hip rotation during gait by observing the direction that the patella points relative to the path of walking, which is referred to as the knee progression angle (KPA). Two kinematic methods for calculating the KPA are compared with each other. Video-based qualitative assessment of KPA is compared with the quantitative methods to determine reliability and validity. Methods: The KPA was calculated by both direct and indirect methods for 32 typically developing (TD) children and a convenience cohort of 43 children with hemiplegic type CP. An additional convenience cohort of 26 children with hemiplegic type CP was selected for qualitative assessment of KPA, performed by 3 experienced clinicians, using 3 categories (internal, >10 degrees; neutral, −10 to 10 degrees; and external, >−10 degrees). Results: Root mean square (RMS) analysis comparing the direct and indirect KPAs was 1.14+0.43 degrees for TD children, and 1.75+1.54 degrees for the affected side of children with CP. The difference in RMS among the 2 groups was statistically, but not clinically, significant (P=0.019). Intraclass correlation coefficient revealed excellent agreement between the direct and indirect methods of KPA for TD and CP children (0.996 and 0.992, respectively; P<0.001). For the qualitative assessment of KPA there was complete agreement among all examiners for 17 of 26 cases (65%). Direct KPA matched for 49 of 78 observations (63%) and indirect KPA matched for 52 of 78 observations (67%). Conclusions: The RMS analysis of direct and indirect methods for KPA was statistically but not clinically significant, which supports the use of either method based upon availability. Video-based qualitative assessment of KPA showed moderate reliability and validity. The differences between observed and calculated KPA indicate the need for caution when relying on visual assessments for clinical interpretation, and demonstrate the value of adding KPA calculation to standard kinematic analysis. Level of Evidence:: Level II—diagnostic test.

AB - Background: Abnormal hip rotation is a common deviation in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Clinicians typically assess hip rotation during gait by observing the direction that the patella points relative to the path of walking, which is referred to as the knee progression angle (KPA). Two kinematic methods for calculating the KPA are compared with each other. Video-based qualitative assessment of KPA is compared with the quantitative methods to determine reliability and validity. Methods: The KPA was calculated by both direct and indirect methods for 32 typically developing (TD) children and a convenience cohort of 43 children with hemiplegic type CP. An additional convenience cohort of 26 children with hemiplegic type CP was selected for qualitative assessment of KPA, performed by 3 experienced clinicians, using 3 categories (internal, >10 degrees; neutral, −10 to 10 degrees; and external, >−10 degrees). Results: Root mean square (RMS) analysis comparing the direct and indirect KPAs was 1.14+0.43 degrees for TD children, and 1.75+1.54 degrees for the affected side of children with CP. The difference in RMS among the 2 groups was statistically, but not clinically, significant (P=0.019). Intraclass correlation coefficient revealed excellent agreement between the direct and indirect methods of KPA for TD and CP children (0.996 and 0.992, respectively; P<0.001). For the qualitative assessment of KPA there was complete agreement among all examiners for 17 of 26 cases (65%). Direct KPA matched for 49 of 78 observations (63%) and indirect KPA matched for 52 of 78 observations (67%). Conclusions: The RMS analysis of direct and indirect methods for KPA was statistically but not clinically significant, which supports the use of either method based upon availability. Video-based qualitative assessment of KPA showed moderate reliability and validity. The differences between observed and calculated KPA indicate the need for caution when relying on visual assessments for clinical interpretation, and demonstrate the value of adding KPA calculation to standard kinematic analysis. Level of Evidence:: Level II—diagnostic test.

KW - cerebral palsy

KW - gait

KW - knee progression angle

KW - quantitative assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041563940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041563940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001134

DO - 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001134

M3 - Article

C2 - 29389721

AN - SCOPUS:85041563940

JO - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

JF - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

SN - 0271-6798

ER -