Quantifying Lateral Frontal Sinus Access: The Upper Blepharoplasty Approach

Toby Steele, Oliver Y. Chin, Michael R. Kinzinger, E Bradley Strong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Despite advances in technology and instrumentation, access to the lateral frontal sinus remains a challenge for surgeons. We sought to quantify the reach and applicability of the upper blepharoplasty approach (UBA) to the frontal sinus. Methods: Twelve cadaveric specimens were obtained for anatomic research and frontal sinuses divided into 3 zones. Zone 1 was defined as medial to the supraorbital neurovascular bundle (SON). The remaining orbit was then bisected to define zone 2 (centrally) and zone 3 (laterally). Twenty-four UBAs were performed followed by 12 modified endoscopic Lothrop procedures (MELP). The ability to instrument each wall of the frontal sinus was recorded for the MELP, UBA, and combined approach. Results: The UBA provided excellent access to the lateral frontal sinus in zones 2 and 3 (89% and 100%). The MELP provided poorer access in zone 3 (67%) but improved access in zone 1 (83%-100%). Access for zone 1 through the UBA was limited. The combined approach yielded 100% access to each frontal sinus boundary. Conclusion: The MELP in combination with the UBA/lateral trephination provides excellent access to each frontal sinus boundary. The UBA provides excellent access to the lateral frontal sinus but is limited medially by the SON.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-161
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology
Volume127
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Blepharoplasty
Transverse Sinuses
Frontal Sinus
Trephining
Orbit
Technology

Keywords

  • cadaver study
  • endoscopic sinus surgery
  • extended frontal sinusotomy
  • external sinus surgery
  • frontal sinusotomy
  • lateral frontal sinus access
  • orbital/ocular
  • paranasal sinuses
  • trephination
  • upper blepharoplasty approach

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Quantifying Lateral Frontal Sinus Access : The Upper Blepharoplasty Approach. / Steele, Toby; Chin, Oliver Y.; Kinzinger, Michael R.; Strong, E Bradley.

In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Vol. 127, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 155-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ab4b488f8eb44751bffcf2ff61c21437,
title = "Quantifying Lateral Frontal Sinus Access: The Upper Blepharoplasty Approach",
abstract = "Objective: Despite advances in technology and instrumentation, access to the lateral frontal sinus remains a challenge for surgeons. We sought to quantify the reach and applicability of the upper blepharoplasty approach (UBA) to the frontal sinus. Methods: Twelve cadaveric specimens were obtained for anatomic research and frontal sinuses divided into 3 zones. Zone 1 was defined as medial to the supraorbital neurovascular bundle (SON). The remaining orbit was then bisected to define zone 2 (centrally) and zone 3 (laterally). Twenty-four UBAs were performed followed by 12 modified endoscopic Lothrop procedures (MELP). The ability to instrument each wall of the frontal sinus was recorded for the MELP, UBA, and combined approach. Results: The UBA provided excellent access to the lateral frontal sinus in zones 2 and 3 (89{\%} and 100{\%}). The MELP provided poorer access in zone 3 (67{\%}) but improved access in zone 1 (83{\%}-100{\%}). Access for zone 1 through the UBA was limited. The combined approach yielded 100{\%} access to each frontal sinus boundary. Conclusion: The MELP in combination with the UBA/lateral trephination provides excellent access to each frontal sinus boundary. The UBA provides excellent access to the lateral frontal sinus but is limited medially by the SON.",
keywords = "cadaver study, endoscopic sinus surgery, extended frontal sinusotomy, external sinus surgery, frontal sinusotomy, lateral frontal sinus access, orbital/ocular, paranasal sinuses, trephination, upper blepharoplasty approach",
author = "Toby Steele and Chin, {Oliver Y.} and Kinzinger, {Michael R.} and Strong, {E Bradley}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0003489417750931",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "127",
pages = "155--161",
journal = "Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology",
issn = "0003-4894",
publisher = "Annals Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying Lateral Frontal Sinus Access

T2 - The Upper Blepharoplasty Approach

AU - Steele, Toby

AU - Chin, Oliver Y.

AU - Kinzinger, Michael R.

AU - Strong, E Bradley

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Objective: Despite advances in technology and instrumentation, access to the lateral frontal sinus remains a challenge for surgeons. We sought to quantify the reach and applicability of the upper blepharoplasty approach (UBA) to the frontal sinus. Methods: Twelve cadaveric specimens were obtained for anatomic research and frontal sinuses divided into 3 zones. Zone 1 was defined as medial to the supraorbital neurovascular bundle (SON). The remaining orbit was then bisected to define zone 2 (centrally) and zone 3 (laterally). Twenty-four UBAs were performed followed by 12 modified endoscopic Lothrop procedures (MELP). The ability to instrument each wall of the frontal sinus was recorded for the MELP, UBA, and combined approach. Results: The UBA provided excellent access to the lateral frontal sinus in zones 2 and 3 (89% and 100%). The MELP provided poorer access in zone 3 (67%) but improved access in zone 1 (83%-100%). Access for zone 1 through the UBA was limited. The combined approach yielded 100% access to each frontal sinus boundary. Conclusion: The MELP in combination with the UBA/lateral trephination provides excellent access to each frontal sinus boundary. The UBA provides excellent access to the lateral frontal sinus but is limited medially by the SON.

AB - Objective: Despite advances in technology and instrumentation, access to the lateral frontal sinus remains a challenge for surgeons. We sought to quantify the reach and applicability of the upper blepharoplasty approach (UBA) to the frontal sinus. Methods: Twelve cadaveric specimens were obtained for anatomic research and frontal sinuses divided into 3 zones. Zone 1 was defined as medial to the supraorbital neurovascular bundle (SON). The remaining orbit was then bisected to define zone 2 (centrally) and zone 3 (laterally). Twenty-four UBAs were performed followed by 12 modified endoscopic Lothrop procedures (MELP). The ability to instrument each wall of the frontal sinus was recorded for the MELP, UBA, and combined approach. Results: The UBA provided excellent access to the lateral frontal sinus in zones 2 and 3 (89% and 100%). The MELP provided poorer access in zone 3 (67%) but improved access in zone 1 (83%-100%). Access for zone 1 through the UBA was limited. The combined approach yielded 100% access to each frontal sinus boundary. Conclusion: The MELP in combination with the UBA/lateral trephination provides excellent access to each frontal sinus boundary. The UBA provides excellent access to the lateral frontal sinus but is limited medially by the SON.

KW - cadaver study

KW - endoscopic sinus surgery

KW - extended frontal sinusotomy

KW - external sinus surgery

KW - frontal sinusotomy

KW - lateral frontal sinus access

KW - orbital/ocular

KW - paranasal sinuses

KW - trephination

KW - upper blepharoplasty approach

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042318271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042318271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0003489417750931

DO - 10.1177/0003489417750931

M3 - Article

C2 - 29298505

AN - SCOPUS:85042318271

VL - 127

SP - 155

EP - 161

JO - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

JF - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

SN - 0003-4894

IS - 3

ER -