Quality standards are needed for reporting of test accuracy studies for animal diseases

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The STARD statement (www.stard-statement.org) emphasizes complete and transparent reporting of key elements of test accuracy studies. Guidelines for authors in many biomedical journals recommend adherence to these standards but explicit recommendations by editors of veterinary journals are limited. Adherence to standards benefits end-users of tests including doctors, veterinarians and other healthcare professionals and the human and animal patients in which the tests are used. Reporting standards also provide a structured basis for researchers and graduate students to prepare manuscripts, and subsequently can be a useful adjunct to the peer-review process. This paper discusses the purpose of STARD and its possible modification for animal disease studies, variation in reporting and design quality in human and animal disease studies, use of a different instrument (QUADAS) for assessing methodological quality, and provides some recommendations for the future. Finally, the contributions of Dr. Hollis Erb to improvements in methodological and reporting qualities of test accuracy studies in Preventive Veterinary Medicine are described.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)136-143
Number of pages8
JournalPreventive Veterinary Medicine
Volume97
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

Fingerprint

Animal Diseases
animal diseases
Preventive Medicine
Peer Review
Veterinary Medicine
Manuscripts
Veterinarians
testing
diseases and disorders (animals and humans)
peers
health care workers
physicians
Research Personnel
Guidelines
Students
veterinary medicine
Delivery of Health Care
veterinarians
students
researchers

Keywords

  • Animal disease
  • Reporting standards
  • Sensitivity and specificity
  • Test accuracy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Animals
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Quality standards are needed for reporting of test accuracy studies for animal diseases. / Gardner, Ian.

In: Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 97, No. 3-4, 01.12.2010, p. 136-143.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8dae56714b2648f7bd16507441cf1721,
title = "Quality standards are needed for reporting of test accuracy studies for animal diseases",
abstract = "The STARD statement (www.stard-statement.org) emphasizes complete and transparent reporting of key elements of test accuracy studies. Guidelines for authors in many biomedical journals recommend adherence to these standards but explicit recommendations by editors of veterinary journals are limited. Adherence to standards benefits end-users of tests including doctors, veterinarians and other healthcare professionals and the human and animal patients in which the tests are used. Reporting standards also provide a structured basis for researchers and graduate students to prepare manuscripts, and subsequently can be a useful adjunct to the peer-review process. This paper discusses the purpose of STARD and its possible modification for animal disease studies, variation in reporting and design quality in human and animal disease studies, use of a different instrument (QUADAS) for assessing methodological quality, and provides some recommendations for the future. Finally, the contributions of Dr. Hollis Erb to improvements in methodological and reporting qualities of test accuracy studies in Preventive Veterinary Medicine are described.",
keywords = "Animal disease, Reporting standards, Sensitivity and specificity, Test accuracy",
author = "Ian Gardner",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.09.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "136--143",
journal = "Preventive Veterinary Medicine",
issn = "0167-5877",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality standards are needed for reporting of test accuracy studies for animal diseases

AU - Gardner, Ian

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - The STARD statement (www.stard-statement.org) emphasizes complete and transparent reporting of key elements of test accuracy studies. Guidelines for authors in many biomedical journals recommend adherence to these standards but explicit recommendations by editors of veterinary journals are limited. Adherence to standards benefits end-users of tests including doctors, veterinarians and other healthcare professionals and the human and animal patients in which the tests are used. Reporting standards also provide a structured basis for researchers and graduate students to prepare manuscripts, and subsequently can be a useful adjunct to the peer-review process. This paper discusses the purpose of STARD and its possible modification for animal disease studies, variation in reporting and design quality in human and animal disease studies, use of a different instrument (QUADAS) for assessing methodological quality, and provides some recommendations for the future. Finally, the contributions of Dr. Hollis Erb to improvements in methodological and reporting qualities of test accuracy studies in Preventive Veterinary Medicine are described.

AB - The STARD statement (www.stard-statement.org) emphasizes complete and transparent reporting of key elements of test accuracy studies. Guidelines for authors in many biomedical journals recommend adherence to these standards but explicit recommendations by editors of veterinary journals are limited. Adherence to standards benefits end-users of tests including doctors, veterinarians and other healthcare professionals and the human and animal patients in which the tests are used. Reporting standards also provide a structured basis for researchers and graduate students to prepare manuscripts, and subsequently can be a useful adjunct to the peer-review process. This paper discusses the purpose of STARD and its possible modification for animal disease studies, variation in reporting and design quality in human and animal disease studies, use of a different instrument (QUADAS) for assessing methodological quality, and provides some recommendations for the future. Finally, the contributions of Dr. Hollis Erb to improvements in methodological and reporting qualities of test accuracy studies in Preventive Veterinary Medicine are described.

KW - Animal disease

KW - Reporting standards

KW - Sensitivity and specificity

KW - Test accuracy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650179334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650179334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.09.009

DO - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.09.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 20950876

AN - SCOPUS:78650179334

VL - 97

SP - 136

EP - 143

JO - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

JF - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

SN - 0167-5877

IS - 3-4

ER -