Quality standard for the treatment of bacteremia

Peter A. Gross, Trisha L. Barrett, E. Patchen Dellinger, Peter J. Krause, William J. Martone, John E. McGowan, Richard L Sweet, Richard P. Wenzel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. The objective of this quality standard is to optimize the treatment of bacteremia in hospitalized patients by ensuring that the antibiotic given is appropriate in terms of the blood culture susceptibility of the pathogen. Although this standard may appear to be minimal in scope, it is needed because appropriate antimicrobial treatment is not given in 5%-17% of cases. To implement the standard, physicians, pharmacists, and microbiologists will need to devise a coordinated strategy. Options. We considered criteria for appropriate dosing, most cost-effective selection, proper antibiotic levels in serum, least toxicity, narrowest spectrum, specific clinical indications, and optimal duration of treatment. All these criteria were rejected as the basis for the standard because they were too controversial and too difficult to be applied by a nonphysician chart reviewer. In contrast, the selection of an antibiotic to which the pathogen is sensitive is a noncontroversial criterion that is easy for a chart reviewer to apply. Outcomes. The standard is designed to reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes of septicemia, such as renal failure, prolonged hospitalization, and death. Evidence. Several well-designed clinical trials without randomization as well as case-controlled studies have confirmed the benefit of using an antibiotic that is appropriate in light of the susceptibility of the isolate in blood culture. Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are not available. Values. Cur premise is that the presence of bacteremia is a risk factor for serious adverse outcomes. We also believe that the administration of antibiotics must always be guided by the susceptibility report for the pathogen(s) obtained from blood cultures. This concern is more critical for pathogens from the blood than for those from most other body sites. We had evidence that susceptibility reports for pathogens from positive blood cultures were not always used properly. We used group discussion to reach a consensus among the members of the Quality Standards Subcommittee. Benefits, harms, and costs. Through the implementation of this standard, at least 5% of cases of bacteremia could be treated more appropriately. An unknown number of deaths would likely be prevented, and mortality from bacteremia treated inappropriately would probably be reduced. The primary undesirable feature of the standard is an increased workload for pharmacists and microbiologists. Recommendations. Treatment of bacteremia with an antibiotic that is appropriate in terms of the pathogen's blood-culture susceptibility is a minimal standard of care for all patients. Validation. We consulted more than 50 experts in infectious diseases from the fields of medicine, surgery, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, nursing, epidemiology, pharmacology, and government. In addition, the methods for its implementation were reviewed by the American Society of Hospital Pharmacists and were tested by one of the members of the Quality Standards Subcommittee. Sponsors. The Quality Standards Subcommittee of the Clinical Affairs Committee of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) developed the standard. The subcommittee was composed of representatives of the IDSA (P.A.G. and J.E.M.), the Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America (R.P.W.), the Surgical Infection Society (E.P.D.), the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (P.J.K.), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (W.J.M.), the Obstetrics and Gynecology Infectious Diseases Society (R.L.S.), and the Association of Practitioners of Infection Control (T.L.B.). Funding was provided by the IDSA and the other cooperating organizations. The standard is endorsed by the IDSA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)428-430
Number of pages3
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume18
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bacteremia
Communicable Diseases
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Therapeutics
Hospital Societies
Pharmacists
Gynecology
Obstetric Nursing
Infectious Disease Medicine
Infection Control Practitioners
Epidemiology
Pediatrics
Standard of Care
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Random Allocation
Workload
Obstetrics
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Renal Insufficiency
Sepsis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology

Cite this

Gross, P. A., Barrett, T. L., Patchen Dellinger, E., Krause, P. J., Martone, W. J., McGowan, J. E., ... Wenzel, R. P. (1994). Quality standard for the treatment of bacteremia. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 18(3), 428-430.

Quality standard for the treatment of bacteremia. / Gross, Peter A.; Barrett, Trisha L.; Patchen Dellinger, E.; Krause, Peter J.; Martone, William J.; McGowan, John E.; Sweet, Richard L; Wenzel, Richard P.

In: Clinical Infectious Diseases, Vol. 18, No. 3, 03.1994, p. 428-430.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gross, PA, Barrett, TL, Patchen Dellinger, E, Krause, PJ, Martone, WJ, McGowan, JE, Sweet, RL & Wenzel, RP 1994, 'Quality standard for the treatment of bacteremia', Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 428-430.
Gross PA, Barrett TL, Patchen Dellinger E, Krause PJ, Martone WJ, McGowan JE et al. Quality standard for the treatment of bacteremia. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1994 Mar;18(3):428-430.
Gross, Peter A. ; Barrett, Trisha L. ; Patchen Dellinger, E. ; Krause, Peter J. ; Martone, William J. ; McGowan, John E. ; Sweet, Richard L ; Wenzel, Richard P. / Quality standard for the treatment of bacteremia. In: Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1994 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 428-430.
@article{c5debce93b3046c9b7a43b2208b46bec,
title = "Quality standard for the treatment of bacteremia",
abstract = "Objective. The objective of this quality standard is to optimize the treatment of bacteremia in hospitalized patients by ensuring that the antibiotic given is appropriate in terms of the blood culture susceptibility of the pathogen. Although this standard may appear to be minimal in scope, it is needed because appropriate antimicrobial treatment is not given in 5{\%}-17{\%} of cases. To implement the standard, physicians, pharmacists, and microbiologists will need to devise a coordinated strategy. Options. We considered criteria for appropriate dosing, most cost-effective selection, proper antibiotic levels in serum, least toxicity, narrowest spectrum, specific clinical indications, and optimal duration of treatment. All these criteria were rejected as the basis for the standard because they were too controversial and too difficult to be applied by a nonphysician chart reviewer. In contrast, the selection of an antibiotic to which the pathogen is sensitive is a noncontroversial criterion that is easy for a chart reviewer to apply. Outcomes. The standard is designed to reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes of septicemia, such as renal failure, prolonged hospitalization, and death. Evidence. Several well-designed clinical trials without randomization as well as case-controlled studies have confirmed the benefit of using an antibiotic that is appropriate in light of the susceptibility of the isolate in blood culture. Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are not available. Values. Cur premise is that the presence of bacteremia is a risk factor for serious adverse outcomes. We also believe that the administration of antibiotics must always be guided by the susceptibility report for the pathogen(s) obtained from blood cultures. This concern is more critical for pathogens from the blood than for those from most other body sites. We had evidence that susceptibility reports for pathogens from positive blood cultures were not always used properly. We used group discussion to reach a consensus among the members of the Quality Standards Subcommittee. Benefits, harms, and costs. Through the implementation of this standard, at least 5{\%} of cases of bacteremia could be treated more appropriately. An unknown number of deaths would likely be prevented, and mortality from bacteremia treated inappropriately would probably be reduced. The primary undesirable feature of the standard is an increased workload for pharmacists and microbiologists. Recommendations. Treatment of bacteremia with an antibiotic that is appropriate in terms of the pathogen's blood-culture susceptibility is a minimal standard of care for all patients. Validation. We consulted more than 50 experts in infectious diseases from the fields of medicine, surgery, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, nursing, epidemiology, pharmacology, and government. In addition, the methods for its implementation were reviewed by the American Society of Hospital Pharmacists and were tested by one of the members of the Quality Standards Subcommittee. Sponsors. The Quality Standards Subcommittee of the Clinical Affairs Committee of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) developed the standard. The subcommittee was composed of representatives of the IDSA (P.A.G. and J.E.M.), the Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America (R.P.W.), the Surgical Infection Society (E.P.D.), the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (P.J.K.), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (W.J.M.), the Obstetrics and Gynecology Infectious Diseases Society (R.L.S.), and the Association of Practitioners of Infection Control (T.L.B.). Funding was provided by the IDSA and the other cooperating organizations. The standard is endorsed by the IDSA.",
author = "Gross, {Peter A.} and Barrett, {Trisha L.} and {Patchen Dellinger}, E. and Krause, {Peter J.} and Martone, {William J.} and McGowan, {John E.} and Sweet, {Richard L} and Wenzel, {Richard P.}",
year = "1994",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "428--430",
journal = "Clinical Infectious Diseases",
issn = "1058-4838",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality standard for the treatment of bacteremia

AU - Gross, Peter A.

AU - Barrett, Trisha L.

AU - Patchen Dellinger, E.

AU - Krause, Peter J.

AU - Martone, William J.

AU - McGowan, John E.

AU - Sweet, Richard L

AU - Wenzel, Richard P.

PY - 1994/3

Y1 - 1994/3

N2 - Objective. The objective of this quality standard is to optimize the treatment of bacteremia in hospitalized patients by ensuring that the antibiotic given is appropriate in terms of the blood culture susceptibility of the pathogen. Although this standard may appear to be minimal in scope, it is needed because appropriate antimicrobial treatment is not given in 5%-17% of cases. To implement the standard, physicians, pharmacists, and microbiologists will need to devise a coordinated strategy. Options. We considered criteria for appropriate dosing, most cost-effective selection, proper antibiotic levels in serum, least toxicity, narrowest spectrum, specific clinical indications, and optimal duration of treatment. All these criteria were rejected as the basis for the standard because they were too controversial and too difficult to be applied by a nonphysician chart reviewer. In contrast, the selection of an antibiotic to which the pathogen is sensitive is a noncontroversial criterion that is easy for a chart reviewer to apply. Outcomes. The standard is designed to reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes of septicemia, such as renal failure, prolonged hospitalization, and death. Evidence. Several well-designed clinical trials without randomization as well as case-controlled studies have confirmed the benefit of using an antibiotic that is appropriate in light of the susceptibility of the isolate in blood culture. Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are not available. Values. Cur premise is that the presence of bacteremia is a risk factor for serious adverse outcomes. We also believe that the administration of antibiotics must always be guided by the susceptibility report for the pathogen(s) obtained from blood cultures. This concern is more critical for pathogens from the blood than for those from most other body sites. We had evidence that susceptibility reports for pathogens from positive blood cultures were not always used properly. We used group discussion to reach a consensus among the members of the Quality Standards Subcommittee. Benefits, harms, and costs. Through the implementation of this standard, at least 5% of cases of bacteremia could be treated more appropriately. An unknown number of deaths would likely be prevented, and mortality from bacteremia treated inappropriately would probably be reduced. The primary undesirable feature of the standard is an increased workload for pharmacists and microbiologists. Recommendations. Treatment of bacteremia with an antibiotic that is appropriate in terms of the pathogen's blood-culture susceptibility is a minimal standard of care for all patients. Validation. We consulted more than 50 experts in infectious diseases from the fields of medicine, surgery, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, nursing, epidemiology, pharmacology, and government. In addition, the methods for its implementation were reviewed by the American Society of Hospital Pharmacists and were tested by one of the members of the Quality Standards Subcommittee. Sponsors. The Quality Standards Subcommittee of the Clinical Affairs Committee of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) developed the standard. The subcommittee was composed of representatives of the IDSA (P.A.G. and J.E.M.), the Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America (R.P.W.), the Surgical Infection Society (E.P.D.), the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (P.J.K.), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (W.J.M.), the Obstetrics and Gynecology Infectious Diseases Society (R.L.S.), and the Association of Practitioners of Infection Control (T.L.B.). Funding was provided by the IDSA and the other cooperating organizations. The standard is endorsed by the IDSA.

AB - Objective. The objective of this quality standard is to optimize the treatment of bacteremia in hospitalized patients by ensuring that the antibiotic given is appropriate in terms of the blood culture susceptibility of the pathogen. Although this standard may appear to be minimal in scope, it is needed because appropriate antimicrobial treatment is not given in 5%-17% of cases. To implement the standard, physicians, pharmacists, and microbiologists will need to devise a coordinated strategy. Options. We considered criteria for appropriate dosing, most cost-effective selection, proper antibiotic levels in serum, least toxicity, narrowest spectrum, specific clinical indications, and optimal duration of treatment. All these criteria were rejected as the basis for the standard because they were too controversial and too difficult to be applied by a nonphysician chart reviewer. In contrast, the selection of an antibiotic to which the pathogen is sensitive is a noncontroversial criterion that is easy for a chart reviewer to apply. Outcomes. The standard is designed to reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes of septicemia, such as renal failure, prolonged hospitalization, and death. Evidence. Several well-designed clinical trials without randomization as well as case-controlled studies have confirmed the benefit of using an antibiotic that is appropriate in light of the susceptibility of the isolate in blood culture. Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are not available. Values. Cur premise is that the presence of bacteremia is a risk factor for serious adverse outcomes. We also believe that the administration of antibiotics must always be guided by the susceptibility report for the pathogen(s) obtained from blood cultures. This concern is more critical for pathogens from the blood than for those from most other body sites. We had evidence that susceptibility reports for pathogens from positive blood cultures were not always used properly. We used group discussion to reach a consensus among the members of the Quality Standards Subcommittee. Benefits, harms, and costs. Through the implementation of this standard, at least 5% of cases of bacteremia could be treated more appropriately. An unknown number of deaths would likely be prevented, and mortality from bacteremia treated inappropriately would probably be reduced. The primary undesirable feature of the standard is an increased workload for pharmacists and microbiologists. Recommendations. Treatment of bacteremia with an antibiotic that is appropriate in terms of the pathogen's blood-culture susceptibility is a minimal standard of care for all patients. Validation. We consulted more than 50 experts in infectious diseases from the fields of medicine, surgery, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, nursing, epidemiology, pharmacology, and government. In addition, the methods for its implementation were reviewed by the American Society of Hospital Pharmacists and were tested by one of the members of the Quality Standards Subcommittee. Sponsors. The Quality Standards Subcommittee of the Clinical Affairs Committee of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) developed the standard. The subcommittee was composed of representatives of the IDSA (P.A.G. and J.E.M.), the Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America (R.P.W.), the Surgical Infection Society (E.P.D.), the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (P.J.K.), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (W.J.M.), the Obstetrics and Gynecology Infectious Diseases Society (R.L.S.), and the Association of Practitioners of Infection Control (T.L.B.). Funding was provided by the IDSA and the other cooperating organizations. The standard is endorsed by the IDSA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028316180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028316180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 428

EP - 430

JO - Clinical Infectious Diseases

JF - Clinical Infectious Diseases

SN - 1058-4838

IS - 3

ER -