Quality-of-life and surgical treatments for rectal cancer - A longitudinal analysis using the California Cancer Registry

Julie Smith-Gagen, Rosemary D Cress, Christiana M. Drake, Patrick S Romano, Kathleen J. Yost, John Z. Ayanian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Heterogeneous results for research investigating health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients undergoing sphincter-ablating procedures for rectal cancer are likely due to single institution experiences and measurement of HRQL. To address this heterogeneity, we evaluated HRQL in patients with rectal cancer by type of surgery, location of tumor, and receipt of adjuvant therapy using an HRQL instrument that has not been used to address rectal cancer patients in a population-based sample over time. Methods: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal instrument was administered at 9 and 19 months after diagnosis to a consecutive sample of 160 patients in Northern California identified by the California Cancer Registry. A broad multidimensional interpretation of HRQL was used to examine the impact of tumor location and treatment status, stage of disease, age, and gender. Results: In general, men had lower social well-being scores, and younger patients had lower physical and emotional well-being scores and colorectal concerns scores. We found no differences in HRQL by either tumor location or type of surgery, at either 9 or 19 months after diagnosis. Lower physical well-being and greater adverse colorectal concerns were reported at 9 months among patients who received adjuvant therapy; however, only adverse colorectal concerns persisted over time. Conclusions: This study provides additional evidence that sphincter-ablating procedures do not necessarily reduce quality of life in patients with rectal cancer. Distinctive features of this study include a broad multidimensional interpretation of HRQL, the 19 months of longitudinal follow-up, and a prospective population-based study design.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)870-878
Number of pages9
JournalPsycho-Oncology
Volume19
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint

Rectal Neoplasms
Registries
Quality of Life
Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Population
Colorectal Neoplasms
Research

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Oncology
  • Quality-of-life
  • Rectal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Quality-of-life and surgical treatments for rectal cancer - A longitudinal analysis using the California Cancer Registry. / Smith-Gagen, Julie; Cress, Rosemary D; Drake, Christiana M.; Romano, Patrick S; Yost, Kathleen J.; Ayanian, John Z.

In: Psycho-Oncology, Vol. 19, No. 8, 08.2010, p. 870-878.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith-Gagen, Julie ; Cress, Rosemary D ; Drake, Christiana M. ; Romano, Patrick S ; Yost, Kathleen J. ; Ayanian, John Z. / Quality-of-life and surgical treatments for rectal cancer - A longitudinal analysis using the California Cancer Registry. In: Psycho-Oncology. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 8. pp. 870-878.
@article{7cf7ce92352046feb3751a0e3361cc02,
title = "Quality-of-life and surgical treatments for rectal cancer - A longitudinal analysis using the California Cancer Registry",
abstract = "Background: Heterogeneous results for research investigating health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients undergoing sphincter-ablating procedures for rectal cancer are likely due to single institution experiences and measurement of HRQL. To address this heterogeneity, we evaluated HRQL in patients with rectal cancer by type of surgery, location of tumor, and receipt of adjuvant therapy using an HRQL instrument that has not been used to address rectal cancer patients in a population-based sample over time. Methods: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal instrument was administered at 9 and 19 months after diagnosis to a consecutive sample of 160 patients in Northern California identified by the California Cancer Registry. A broad multidimensional interpretation of HRQL was used to examine the impact of tumor location and treatment status, stage of disease, age, and gender. Results: In general, men had lower social well-being scores, and younger patients had lower physical and emotional well-being scores and colorectal concerns scores. We found no differences in HRQL by either tumor location or type of surgery, at either 9 or 19 months after diagnosis. Lower physical well-being and greater adverse colorectal concerns were reported at 9 months among patients who received adjuvant therapy; however, only adverse colorectal concerns persisted over time. Conclusions: This study provides additional evidence that sphincter-ablating procedures do not necessarily reduce quality of life in patients with rectal cancer. Distinctive features of this study include a broad multidimensional interpretation of HRQL, the 19 months of longitudinal follow-up, and a prospective population-based study design.",
keywords = "Cancer, Oncology, Quality-of-life, Rectal",
author = "Julie Smith-Gagen and Cress, {Rosemary D} and Drake, {Christiana M.} and Romano, {Patrick S} and Yost, {Kathleen J.} and Ayanian, {John Z.}",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1002/pon.1643",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "870--878",
journal = "Psycho-Oncology",
issn = "1057-9249",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality-of-life and surgical treatments for rectal cancer - A longitudinal analysis using the California Cancer Registry

AU - Smith-Gagen, Julie

AU - Cress, Rosemary D

AU - Drake, Christiana M.

AU - Romano, Patrick S

AU - Yost, Kathleen J.

AU - Ayanian, John Z.

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - Background: Heterogeneous results for research investigating health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients undergoing sphincter-ablating procedures for rectal cancer are likely due to single institution experiences and measurement of HRQL. To address this heterogeneity, we evaluated HRQL in patients with rectal cancer by type of surgery, location of tumor, and receipt of adjuvant therapy using an HRQL instrument that has not been used to address rectal cancer patients in a population-based sample over time. Methods: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal instrument was administered at 9 and 19 months after diagnosis to a consecutive sample of 160 patients in Northern California identified by the California Cancer Registry. A broad multidimensional interpretation of HRQL was used to examine the impact of tumor location and treatment status, stage of disease, age, and gender. Results: In general, men had lower social well-being scores, and younger patients had lower physical and emotional well-being scores and colorectal concerns scores. We found no differences in HRQL by either tumor location or type of surgery, at either 9 or 19 months after diagnosis. Lower physical well-being and greater adverse colorectal concerns were reported at 9 months among patients who received adjuvant therapy; however, only adverse colorectal concerns persisted over time. Conclusions: This study provides additional evidence that sphincter-ablating procedures do not necessarily reduce quality of life in patients with rectal cancer. Distinctive features of this study include a broad multidimensional interpretation of HRQL, the 19 months of longitudinal follow-up, and a prospective population-based study design.

AB - Background: Heterogeneous results for research investigating health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients undergoing sphincter-ablating procedures for rectal cancer are likely due to single institution experiences and measurement of HRQL. To address this heterogeneity, we evaluated HRQL in patients with rectal cancer by type of surgery, location of tumor, and receipt of adjuvant therapy using an HRQL instrument that has not been used to address rectal cancer patients in a population-based sample over time. Methods: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal instrument was administered at 9 and 19 months after diagnosis to a consecutive sample of 160 patients in Northern California identified by the California Cancer Registry. A broad multidimensional interpretation of HRQL was used to examine the impact of tumor location and treatment status, stage of disease, age, and gender. Results: In general, men had lower social well-being scores, and younger patients had lower physical and emotional well-being scores and colorectal concerns scores. We found no differences in HRQL by either tumor location or type of surgery, at either 9 or 19 months after diagnosis. Lower physical well-being and greater adverse colorectal concerns were reported at 9 months among patients who received adjuvant therapy; however, only adverse colorectal concerns persisted over time. Conclusions: This study provides additional evidence that sphincter-ablating procedures do not necessarily reduce quality of life in patients with rectal cancer. Distinctive features of this study include a broad multidimensional interpretation of HRQL, the 19 months of longitudinal follow-up, and a prospective population-based study design.

KW - Cancer

KW - Oncology

KW - Quality-of-life

KW - Rectal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955166614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955166614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pon.1643

DO - 10.1002/pon.1643

M3 - Article

C2 - 19862692

AN - SCOPUS:77955166614

VL - 19

SP - 870

EP - 878

JO - Psycho-Oncology

JF - Psycho-Oncology

SN - 1057-9249

IS - 8

ER -