Quality of life among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Allen M. Chen, Megan E Daly, D Gregory Farwell, Esther Vazquez, Jean Courquin, Derick H Lau, James A. Purdy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Radiation therapy to the head and neck has traditionally been associated with adverse effects that can affect oral health and physical functioning. Although intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been widely adopted as a means of decreasing toxic effects, limited clinical data exist on its potential effect on long-term quality of life. OBJECTIVE To analyze quality of life among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated with IMRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional analysis studied 50 consecutive long-term survivors of head and neck cancer from a comprehensive cancer center who had previously undergone IMRT that required bilateral neck irradiation for locally advanced disease. All patients were clinically without evidence of recurrent disease and had at least 5 years of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The University ofWashington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) scoreswere reviewed for all study participants. The UW-QOL questionnaire consists of 12 domains that pertain to the degree of quality of life in the categories of pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder function, taste, saliva, mood, and anxiety. RESULTS: Five years after completion of IMRT, 42 patients (84%) reported that their health-related quality of life was "much better" or "somewhat better" than at the time of cancer diagnosis. With respect to recent health-related quality of life during the preceding 7 days at the time of completing the UW-QOL questionnaire, 40 patients (80%) treated with IMRT reported " outstanding" or "very good" levels of functioning. Five years after completion of treatment, 41 (82%) rated their overall quality of life as "outstanding" or "very good." The lowest domain score on the UW-QOL questionnaire at 5 years pertained to salivary dysfunction. However, 42 patients (84%) reported saliva "of normal consistency" or "less saliva than normal but enough" compared with 8 (16%) reporting "too little saliva." No patient reported having "no saliva." CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our findings add to the body of literature that supports the acceptance of IMRT as standard treatment for head and neck cancer. The fact that most 5-year survivors were satisfied with their quality of lives points to the ability of IMRT to preserve long-term functioning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-133
Number of pages5
JournalJAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume140
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Survivors
Quality of Life
Saliva
Neck
Recreation
Aptitude
Poisons
Mastication
Oral Health
Deglutition
Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Anxiety
Cross-Sectional Studies
Head
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Quality of life among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy. / Chen, Allen M.; Daly, Megan E; Farwell, D Gregory; Vazquez, Esther; Courquin, Jean; Lau, Derick H; Purdy, James A.

In: JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 140, No. 2, 02.2014, p. 129-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6f9bfc6f28d94996bebdb95afb74097c,
title = "Quality of life among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE: Radiation therapy to the head and neck has traditionally been associated with adverse effects that can affect oral health and physical functioning. Although intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been widely adopted as a means of decreasing toxic effects, limited clinical data exist on its potential effect on long-term quality of life. OBJECTIVE To analyze quality of life among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated with IMRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional analysis studied 50 consecutive long-term survivors of head and neck cancer from a comprehensive cancer center who had previously undergone IMRT that required bilateral neck irradiation for locally advanced disease. All patients were clinically without evidence of recurrent disease and had at least 5 years of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The University ofWashington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) scoreswere reviewed for all study participants. The UW-QOL questionnaire consists of 12 domains that pertain to the degree of quality of life in the categories of pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder function, taste, saliva, mood, and anxiety. RESULTS: Five years after completion of IMRT, 42 patients (84{\%}) reported that their health-related quality of life was {"}much better{"} or {"}somewhat better{"} than at the time of cancer diagnosis. With respect to recent health-related quality of life during the preceding 7 days at the time of completing the UW-QOL questionnaire, 40 patients (80{\%}) treated with IMRT reported {"} outstanding{"} or {"}very good{"} levels of functioning. Five years after completion of treatment, 41 (82{\%}) rated their overall quality of life as {"}outstanding{"} or {"}very good.{"} The lowest domain score on the UW-QOL questionnaire at 5 years pertained to salivary dysfunction. However, 42 patients (84{\%}) reported saliva {"}of normal consistency{"} or {"}less saliva than normal but enough{"} compared with 8 (16{\%}) reporting {"}too little saliva.{"} No patient reported having {"}no saliva.{"} CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our findings add to the body of literature that supports the acceptance of IMRT as standard treatment for head and neck cancer. The fact that most 5-year survivors were satisfied with their quality of lives points to the ability of IMRT to preserve long-term functioning.",
author = "Chen, {Allen M.} and Daly, {Megan E} and Farwell, {D Gregory} and Esther Vazquez and Jean Courquin and Lau, {Derick H} and Purdy, {James A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5988",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "140",
pages = "129--133",
journal = "JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "2168-6181",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of life among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy

AU - Chen, Allen M.

AU - Daly, Megan E

AU - Farwell, D Gregory

AU - Vazquez, Esther

AU - Courquin, Jean

AU - Lau, Derick H

AU - Purdy, James A.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - IMPORTANCE: Radiation therapy to the head and neck has traditionally been associated with adverse effects that can affect oral health and physical functioning. Although intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been widely adopted as a means of decreasing toxic effects, limited clinical data exist on its potential effect on long-term quality of life. OBJECTIVE To analyze quality of life among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated with IMRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional analysis studied 50 consecutive long-term survivors of head and neck cancer from a comprehensive cancer center who had previously undergone IMRT that required bilateral neck irradiation for locally advanced disease. All patients were clinically without evidence of recurrent disease and had at least 5 years of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The University ofWashington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) scoreswere reviewed for all study participants. The UW-QOL questionnaire consists of 12 domains that pertain to the degree of quality of life in the categories of pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder function, taste, saliva, mood, and anxiety. RESULTS: Five years after completion of IMRT, 42 patients (84%) reported that their health-related quality of life was "much better" or "somewhat better" than at the time of cancer diagnosis. With respect to recent health-related quality of life during the preceding 7 days at the time of completing the UW-QOL questionnaire, 40 patients (80%) treated with IMRT reported " outstanding" or "very good" levels of functioning. Five years after completion of treatment, 41 (82%) rated their overall quality of life as "outstanding" or "very good." The lowest domain score on the UW-QOL questionnaire at 5 years pertained to salivary dysfunction. However, 42 patients (84%) reported saliva "of normal consistency" or "less saliva than normal but enough" compared with 8 (16%) reporting "too little saliva." No patient reported having "no saliva." CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our findings add to the body of literature that supports the acceptance of IMRT as standard treatment for head and neck cancer. The fact that most 5-year survivors were satisfied with their quality of lives points to the ability of IMRT to preserve long-term functioning.

AB - IMPORTANCE: Radiation therapy to the head and neck has traditionally been associated with adverse effects that can affect oral health and physical functioning. Although intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been widely adopted as a means of decreasing toxic effects, limited clinical data exist on its potential effect on long-term quality of life. OBJECTIVE To analyze quality of life among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated with IMRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional analysis studied 50 consecutive long-term survivors of head and neck cancer from a comprehensive cancer center who had previously undergone IMRT that required bilateral neck irradiation for locally advanced disease. All patients were clinically without evidence of recurrent disease and had at least 5 years of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The University ofWashington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) scoreswere reviewed for all study participants. The UW-QOL questionnaire consists of 12 domains that pertain to the degree of quality of life in the categories of pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder function, taste, saliva, mood, and anxiety. RESULTS: Five years after completion of IMRT, 42 patients (84%) reported that their health-related quality of life was "much better" or "somewhat better" than at the time of cancer diagnosis. With respect to recent health-related quality of life during the preceding 7 days at the time of completing the UW-QOL questionnaire, 40 patients (80%) treated with IMRT reported " outstanding" or "very good" levels of functioning. Five years after completion of treatment, 41 (82%) rated their overall quality of life as "outstanding" or "very good." The lowest domain score on the UW-QOL questionnaire at 5 years pertained to salivary dysfunction. However, 42 patients (84%) reported saliva "of normal consistency" or "less saliva than normal but enough" compared with 8 (16%) reporting "too little saliva." No patient reported having "no saliva." CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our findings add to the body of literature that supports the acceptance of IMRT as standard treatment for head and neck cancer. The fact that most 5-year survivors were satisfied with their quality of lives points to the ability of IMRT to preserve long-term functioning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894468502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894468502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5988

DO - 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5988

M3 - Article

C2 - 24337483

AN - SCOPUS:84894468502

VL - 140

SP - 129

EP - 133

JO - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

JF - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 2168-6181

IS - 2

ER -