Qualitative study of cardiologists' perceptions of factors influencing clinical practice decisions

Veena Manja, Gordon Guyatt, John You, Sandra Monteiro, Susan Jack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Healthcare costs are increasing in the USA and Canada and a substantial portion of health spending is devoted to services that do not improve health outcomes. Efforts to reduce waste by adopting evidence-based clinical practice guideline recommendations have had limited success. We sought insight into improving health system efficiency through understanding cardiologists' perceptions of factors that influence clinical decision-making. Methods: In this descriptive qualitative study, we conducted in-depth interviews with 18 American and 3 Canadian cardiologists. We used conventional content analysis including inductive and deductive approaches for data analysis and mapped findings to the ecological systems framework. Results: Physicians reported that major determinants of practice included interpersonal interactions with peers, patients and administrators; financial incentives and system factors. Patients' insurance status represented an important consideration for some cardiologists. Other major influences included time constraints, fear of litigation (less prominent in Canada), a sense that their obligation was never to miss any underlying pathology, and patient demands. The need to bring income into their health system influenced American cardiologists' practice; personal income implications influenced Canadian cardiologists' practice. Cardiologists reported that knowledge limitations and logistical challenges limit their ability to assist patients with cost considerations. All these considerations were more influential than guidelines; some cardiologists expressed a high level of scepticism regarding guidelines. Conclusions: Clinical decision-making by cardiologists is shaped by individual, interpersonal, organisational, environmental, financial and sociopolitical influences and only to a limited extent by guideline recommendations. Successful strategies to achieve efficient, evidence-based care will require addressing socioecological influences on decision-making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHeart
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Health
Guidelines
Canada
Aptitude
Insurance Coverage
Cardiologists
Evidence-Based Practice
Jurisprudence
Administrative Personnel
Practice Guidelines
Health Care Costs
Fear
Ecosystem
Motivation
Decision Making
Interviews
Pathology
Physicians
Efficiency
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • health care economics
  • health services
  • quality and outcomes of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Qualitative study of cardiologists' perceptions of factors influencing clinical practice decisions. / Manja, Veena; Guyatt, Gordon; You, John; Monteiro, Sandra; Jack, Susan.

In: Heart, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Manja, Veena ; Guyatt, Gordon ; You, John ; Monteiro, Sandra ; Jack, Susan. / Qualitative study of cardiologists' perceptions of factors influencing clinical practice decisions. In: Heart. 2018.
@article{95f6b4faf33b4d2ab4c28dbbcd6113a4,
title = "Qualitative study of cardiologists' perceptions of factors influencing clinical practice decisions",
abstract = "Background: Healthcare costs are increasing in the USA and Canada and a substantial portion of health spending is devoted to services that do not improve health outcomes. Efforts to reduce waste by adopting evidence-based clinical practice guideline recommendations have had limited success. We sought insight into improving health system efficiency through understanding cardiologists' perceptions of factors that influence clinical decision-making. Methods: In this descriptive qualitative study, we conducted in-depth interviews with 18 American and 3 Canadian cardiologists. We used conventional content analysis including inductive and deductive approaches for data analysis and mapped findings to the ecological systems framework. Results: Physicians reported that major determinants of practice included interpersonal interactions with peers, patients and administrators; financial incentives and system factors. Patients' insurance status represented an important consideration for some cardiologists. Other major influences included time constraints, fear of litigation (less prominent in Canada), a sense that their obligation was never to miss any underlying pathology, and patient demands. The need to bring income into their health system influenced American cardiologists' practice; personal income implications influenced Canadian cardiologists' practice. Cardiologists reported that knowledge limitations and logistical challenges limit their ability to assist patients with cost considerations. All these considerations were more influential than guidelines; some cardiologists expressed a high level of scepticism regarding guidelines. Conclusions: Clinical decision-making by cardiologists is shaped by individual, interpersonal, organisational, environmental, financial and sociopolitical influences and only to a limited extent by guideline recommendations. Successful strategies to achieve efficient, evidence-based care will require addressing socioecological influences on decision-making.",
keywords = "health care economics, health services, quality and outcomes of care",
author = "Veena Manja and Gordon Guyatt and John You and Sandra Monteiro and Susan Jack",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314339",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Heart",
issn = "1355-6037",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Qualitative study of cardiologists' perceptions of factors influencing clinical practice decisions

AU - Manja, Veena

AU - Guyatt, Gordon

AU - You, John

AU - Monteiro, Sandra

AU - Jack, Susan

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Healthcare costs are increasing in the USA and Canada and a substantial portion of health spending is devoted to services that do not improve health outcomes. Efforts to reduce waste by adopting evidence-based clinical practice guideline recommendations have had limited success. We sought insight into improving health system efficiency through understanding cardiologists' perceptions of factors that influence clinical decision-making. Methods: In this descriptive qualitative study, we conducted in-depth interviews with 18 American and 3 Canadian cardiologists. We used conventional content analysis including inductive and deductive approaches for data analysis and mapped findings to the ecological systems framework. Results: Physicians reported that major determinants of practice included interpersonal interactions with peers, patients and administrators; financial incentives and system factors. Patients' insurance status represented an important consideration for some cardiologists. Other major influences included time constraints, fear of litigation (less prominent in Canada), a sense that their obligation was never to miss any underlying pathology, and patient demands. The need to bring income into their health system influenced American cardiologists' practice; personal income implications influenced Canadian cardiologists' practice. Cardiologists reported that knowledge limitations and logistical challenges limit their ability to assist patients with cost considerations. All these considerations were more influential than guidelines; some cardiologists expressed a high level of scepticism regarding guidelines. Conclusions: Clinical decision-making by cardiologists is shaped by individual, interpersonal, organisational, environmental, financial and sociopolitical influences and only to a limited extent by guideline recommendations. Successful strategies to achieve efficient, evidence-based care will require addressing socioecological influences on decision-making.

AB - Background: Healthcare costs are increasing in the USA and Canada and a substantial portion of health spending is devoted to services that do not improve health outcomes. Efforts to reduce waste by adopting evidence-based clinical practice guideline recommendations have had limited success. We sought insight into improving health system efficiency through understanding cardiologists' perceptions of factors that influence clinical decision-making. Methods: In this descriptive qualitative study, we conducted in-depth interviews with 18 American and 3 Canadian cardiologists. We used conventional content analysis including inductive and deductive approaches for data analysis and mapped findings to the ecological systems framework. Results: Physicians reported that major determinants of practice included interpersonal interactions with peers, patients and administrators; financial incentives and system factors. Patients' insurance status represented an important consideration for some cardiologists. Other major influences included time constraints, fear of litigation (less prominent in Canada), a sense that their obligation was never to miss any underlying pathology, and patient demands. The need to bring income into their health system influenced American cardiologists' practice; personal income implications influenced Canadian cardiologists' practice. Cardiologists reported that knowledge limitations and logistical challenges limit their ability to assist patients with cost considerations. All these considerations were more influential than guidelines; some cardiologists expressed a high level of scepticism regarding guidelines. Conclusions: Clinical decision-making by cardiologists is shaped by individual, interpersonal, organisational, environmental, financial and sociopolitical influences and only to a limited extent by guideline recommendations. Successful strategies to achieve efficient, evidence-based care will require addressing socioecological influences on decision-making.

KW - health care economics

KW - health services

KW - quality and outcomes of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059891438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059891438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314339

DO - 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314339

M3 - Article

C2 - 30636216

AN - SCOPUS:85059891438

JO - Heart

JF - Heart

SN - 1355-6037

ER -