Pursuit and saccadic tracking exhibit a similar dependence on movement preparation time

Wilsaan Joiner, Mark Shelhamer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Data from previous human and primate studies on saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements suggest that there are shared internal inputs (for example, perception, attention, expectation, and memory) for the initiation of the two types of movements. Additional reports examining the effect of preparation time on movement responses have shown that when ample time is allowed subjects usually generate long-latency "reactive" responses. When the time allowed to prepare a movement is short, however, subjects respond with reduced latency and often anticipate the stimulus ("predictive" response). Based on these findings, we believe that the shared internal inputs at early stages of movement preparation may result in saccade and pursuit eye movements demonstrating the same dependence on preparation time despite acting through different neural pathways further downstream. Previously we demonstrated a behavioral "phase transition" when normal subjects tracked alternating targets with saccades. When preparation time was long (low-frequency pacing) subjects made reactive saccades (latency ∼180 ms). As preparation time monotonically decreased (pacing frequency increased), there was an abrupt transition to a predictive response (latency <100 ms). In the present study we show that a similar transition exists in smooth pursuit tracking and that the point of transition between the two behaviors is the same for both systems. In other words, the same behavior (reactive versus predictive) is selected when pursuit and saccade tracking are tested under the same time constraints. This provides further evidence that the two types of movements are different motor outcomes of a common decision process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)572-586
Number of pages15
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume173
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Saccades
Smooth Pursuit
Eye Movements
Reaction Time
Neural Pathways
Phase Transition
Primates

Keywords

  • Motor response
  • Prediction
  • Preparation time
  • Pursuit
  • Saccade

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Pursuit and saccadic tracking exhibit a similar dependence on movement preparation time. / Joiner, Wilsaan; Shelhamer, Mark.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 173, No. 4, 01.09.2006, p. 572-586.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d76976fedb440479ca47af2cc2f5e7b,
title = "Pursuit and saccadic tracking exhibit a similar dependence on movement preparation time",
abstract = "Data from previous human and primate studies on saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements suggest that there are shared internal inputs (for example, perception, attention, expectation, and memory) for the initiation of the two types of movements. Additional reports examining the effect of preparation time on movement responses have shown that when ample time is allowed subjects usually generate long-latency {"}reactive{"} responses. When the time allowed to prepare a movement is short, however, subjects respond with reduced latency and often anticipate the stimulus ({"}predictive{"} response). Based on these findings, we believe that the shared internal inputs at early stages of movement preparation may result in saccade and pursuit eye movements demonstrating the same dependence on preparation time despite acting through different neural pathways further downstream. Previously we demonstrated a behavioral {"}phase transition{"} when normal subjects tracked alternating targets with saccades. When preparation time was long (low-frequency pacing) subjects made reactive saccades (latency ∼180 ms). As preparation time monotonically decreased (pacing frequency increased), there was an abrupt transition to a predictive response (latency <100 ms). In the present study we show that a similar transition exists in smooth pursuit tracking and that the point of transition between the two behaviors is the same for both systems. In other words, the same behavior (reactive versus predictive) is selected when pursuit and saccade tracking are tested under the same time constraints. This provides further evidence that the two types of movements are different motor outcomes of a common decision process.",
keywords = "Motor response, Prediction, Preparation time, Pursuit, Saccade",
author = "Wilsaan Joiner and Mark Shelhamer",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-006-0400-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "173",
pages = "572--586",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pursuit and saccadic tracking exhibit a similar dependence on movement preparation time

AU - Joiner, Wilsaan

AU - Shelhamer, Mark

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - Data from previous human and primate studies on saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements suggest that there are shared internal inputs (for example, perception, attention, expectation, and memory) for the initiation of the two types of movements. Additional reports examining the effect of preparation time on movement responses have shown that when ample time is allowed subjects usually generate long-latency "reactive" responses. When the time allowed to prepare a movement is short, however, subjects respond with reduced latency and often anticipate the stimulus ("predictive" response). Based on these findings, we believe that the shared internal inputs at early stages of movement preparation may result in saccade and pursuit eye movements demonstrating the same dependence on preparation time despite acting through different neural pathways further downstream. Previously we demonstrated a behavioral "phase transition" when normal subjects tracked alternating targets with saccades. When preparation time was long (low-frequency pacing) subjects made reactive saccades (latency ∼180 ms). As preparation time monotonically decreased (pacing frequency increased), there was an abrupt transition to a predictive response (latency <100 ms). In the present study we show that a similar transition exists in smooth pursuit tracking and that the point of transition between the two behaviors is the same for both systems. In other words, the same behavior (reactive versus predictive) is selected when pursuit and saccade tracking are tested under the same time constraints. This provides further evidence that the two types of movements are different motor outcomes of a common decision process.

AB - Data from previous human and primate studies on saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements suggest that there are shared internal inputs (for example, perception, attention, expectation, and memory) for the initiation of the two types of movements. Additional reports examining the effect of preparation time on movement responses have shown that when ample time is allowed subjects usually generate long-latency "reactive" responses. When the time allowed to prepare a movement is short, however, subjects respond with reduced latency and often anticipate the stimulus ("predictive" response). Based on these findings, we believe that the shared internal inputs at early stages of movement preparation may result in saccade and pursuit eye movements demonstrating the same dependence on preparation time despite acting through different neural pathways further downstream. Previously we demonstrated a behavioral "phase transition" when normal subjects tracked alternating targets with saccades. When preparation time was long (low-frequency pacing) subjects made reactive saccades (latency ∼180 ms). As preparation time monotonically decreased (pacing frequency increased), there was an abrupt transition to a predictive response (latency <100 ms). In the present study we show that a similar transition exists in smooth pursuit tracking and that the point of transition between the two behaviors is the same for both systems. In other words, the same behavior (reactive versus predictive) is selected when pursuit and saccade tracking are tested under the same time constraints. This provides further evidence that the two types of movements are different motor outcomes of a common decision process.

KW - Motor response

KW - Prediction

KW - Preparation time

KW - Pursuit

KW - Saccade

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747882659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747882659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-006-0400-3

DO - 10.1007/s00221-006-0400-3

M3 - Article

VL - 173

SP - 572

EP - 586

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 4

ER -