Psychiatry and the Death Penalty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Psychiatrists conducting forensic evaluations of defendants facing a potential death penalty must understand the legal and ethical parameters governing these assessments in addition to the important clinical issues. Important areas to review with each defendant include the role of the evaluator, the party requesting the evaluation, circumstances in which the evaluation is not confidential, the nature, scope, and purpose of the evaluation, and the parties to whom the results of the evaluation are to be forwarded. In those circumstances in which the defense attorney has not retained the psychiatrist, the defendant's attorney must be aware that an evaluation has been ordered by the court or requested by the prosecution. The psychiatrist also must be prepared for passionate challenges to their findings from the defense or prosecution and in some instances for vigorous attacks on their own personal ethics. To weather such storms, the mental health evaluator must base their opinion on objective evidence rather than letting any personal bias guide their assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)791-804
Number of pages14
JournalPsychiatric Clinics of North America
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2006

Fingerprint

Capital Punishment
Psychiatry
Lawyers
Weather
Ethics
Mental Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Psychiatry and the Death Penalty. / Scott, Charles L.

In: Psychiatric Clinics of North America, Vol. 29, No. 3, 09.2006, p. 791-804.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9b2cc099da6e45b4b283dfa3e3415abc,
title = "Psychiatry and the Death Penalty",
abstract = "Psychiatrists conducting forensic evaluations of defendants facing a potential death penalty must understand the legal and ethical parameters governing these assessments in addition to the important clinical issues. Important areas to review with each defendant include the role of the evaluator, the party requesting the evaluation, circumstances in which the evaluation is not confidential, the nature, scope, and purpose of the evaluation, and the parties to whom the results of the evaluation are to be forwarded. In those circumstances in which the defense attorney has not retained the psychiatrist, the defendant's attorney must be aware that an evaluation has been ordered by the court or requested by the prosecution. The psychiatrist also must be prepared for passionate challenges to their findings from the defense or prosecution and in some instances for vigorous attacks on their own personal ethics. To weather such storms, the mental health evaluator must base their opinion on objective evidence rather than letting any personal bias guide their assessment.",
author = "Scott, {Charles L}",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.psc.2006.04.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "791--804",
journal = "Psychiatric Clinics of North America",
issn = "0193-953X",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychiatry and the Death Penalty

AU - Scott, Charles L

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - Psychiatrists conducting forensic evaluations of defendants facing a potential death penalty must understand the legal and ethical parameters governing these assessments in addition to the important clinical issues. Important areas to review with each defendant include the role of the evaluator, the party requesting the evaluation, circumstances in which the evaluation is not confidential, the nature, scope, and purpose of the evaluation, and the parties to whom the results of the evaluation are to be forwarded. In those circumstances in which the defense attorney has not retained the psychiatrist, the defendant's attorney must be aware that an evaluation has been ordered by the court or requested by the prosecution. The psychiatrist also must be prepared for passionate challenges to their findings from the defense or prosecution and in some instances for vigorous attacks on their own personal ethics. To weather such storms, the mental health evaluator must base their opinion on objective evidence rather than letting any personal bias guide their assessment.

AB - Psychiatrists conducting forensic evaluations of defendants facing a potential death penalty must understand the legal and ethical parameters governing these assessments in addition to the important clinical issues. Important areas to review with each defendant include the role of the evaluator, the party requesting the evaluation, circumstances in which the evaluation is not confidential, the nature, scope, and purpose of the evaluation, and the parties to whom the results of the evaluation are to be forwarded. In those circumstances in which the defense attorney has not retained the psychiatrist, the defendant's attorney must be aware that an evaluation has been ordered by the court or requested by the prosecution. The psychiatrist also must be prepared for passionate challenges to their findings from the defense or prosecution and in some instances for vigorous attacks on their own personal ethics. To weather such storms, the mental health evaluator must base their opinion on objective evidence rather than letting any personal bias guide their assessment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746835762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746835762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.psc.2006.04.002

DO - 10.1016/j.psc.2006.04.002

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 791

EP - 804

JO - Psychiatric Clinics of North America

JF - Psychiatric Clinics of North America

SN - 0193-953X

IS - 3

ER -