Psychiatric findings among psychiatric inpatients grouped by public and private payment

Richard Dalton, Thomas Moseley, Barbara E McDermott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The study compared school-age psychiatric inpatients whose care was publicly funded with those whose care was privately funded to determine whether the public patients presented with more psychiatric risk factors and more psychiatric problems. Methods: Retrospective chart review was used to collect data on the demographic and personal characteristics, behavior in the hospital, and response to milieu treatment of 40 public patients and 40 private patients. Half of each group were admitted during 1985-1986, and half during 1991-1993. Characteristics of the two groups were compared, and trends over time were examined. Results: The public group presented for hospitalization with significantly more risk factors and psychiatric problems. Public status predicted the use of certain interventions, such as time-outs and physical holding. Public patients responded less positively to the treatment program. They bad three times the number of bed-days as the private group during 1991-1993. Conclusions: Public patients require more intensive and extensive inpatient treatment and will be more profoundly affected by the restrictions on psychiatric inpatient care in the current climate of fiscal restraint.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)689-693
Number of pages5
JournalPsychiatric Services
Volume48
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychiatry
Inpatients
Group
inpatient treatment
Hospitalization Insurance
hospitalization
Climate
climate
Therapeutics
Demography
trend
school
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Psychiatric findings among psychiatric inpatients grouped by public and private payment. / Dalton, Richard; Moseley, Thomas; McDermott, Barbara E.

In: Psychiatric Services, Vol. 48, No. 5, 05.1997, p. 689-693.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e60cdbc3d9454d329fd13601e997587f,
title = "Psychiatric findings among psychiatric inpatients grouped by public and private payment",
abstract = "Objective: The study compared school-age psychiatric inpatients whose care was publicly funded with those whose care was privately funded to determine whether the public patients presented with more psychiatric risk factors and more psychiatric problems. Methods: Retrospective chart review was used to collect data on the demographic and personal characteristics, behavior in the hospital, and response to milieu treatment of 40 public patients and 40 private patients. Half of each group were admitted during 1985-1986, and half during 1991-1993. Characteristics of the two groups were compared, and trends over time were examined. Results: The public group presented for hospitalization with significantly more risk factors and psychiatric problems. Public status predicted the use of certain interventions, such as time-outs and physical holding. Public patients responded less positively to the treatment program. They bad three times the number of bed-days as the private group during 1991-1993. Conclusions: Public patients require more intensive and extensive inpatient treatment and will be more profoundly affected by the restrictions on psychiatric inpatient care in the current climate of fiscal restraint.",
author = "Richard Dalton and Thomas Moseley and McDermott, {Barbara E}",
year = "1997",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "689--693",
journal = "Psychiatric Services",
issn = "1075-2730",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychiatric findings among psychiatric inpatients grouped by public and private payment

AU - Dalton, Richard

AU - Moseley, Thomas

AU - McDermott, Barbara E

PY - 1997/5

Y1 - 1997/5

N2 - Objective: The study compared school-age psychiatric inpatients whose care was publicly funded with those whose care was privately funded to determine whether the public patients presented with more psychiatric risk factors and more psychiatric problems. Methods: Retrospective chart review was used to collect data on the demographic and personal characteristics, behavior in the hospital, and response to milieu treatment of 40 public patients and 40 private patients. Half of each group were admitted during 1985-1986, and half during 1991-1993. Characteristics of the two groups were compared, and trends over time were examined. Results: The public group presented for hospitalization with significantly more risk factors and psychiatric problems. Public status predicted the use of certain interventions, such as time-outs and physical holding. Public patients responded less positively to the treatment program. They bad three times the number of bed-days as the private group during 1991-1993. Conclusions: Public patients require more intensive and extensive inpatient treatment and will be more profoundly affected by the restrictions on psychiatric inpatient care in the current climate of fiscal restraint.

AB - Objective: The study compared school-age psychiatric inpatients whose care was publicly funded with those whose care was privately funded to determine whether the public patients presented with more psychiatric risk factors and more psychiatric problems. Methods: Retrospective chart review was used to collect data on the demographic and personal characteristics, behavior in the hospital, and response to milieu treatment of 40 public patients and 40 private patients. Half of each group were admitted during 1985-1986, and half during 1991-1993. Characteristics of the two groups were compared, and trends over time were examined. Results: The public group presented for hospitalization with significantly more risk factors and psychiatric problems. Public status predicted the use of certain interventions, such as time-outs and physical holding. Public patients responded less positively to the treatment program. They bad three times the number of bed-days as the private group during 1991-1993. Conclusions: Public patients require more intensive and extensive inpatient treatment and will be more profoundly affected by the restrictions on psychiatric inpatient care in the current climate of fiscal restraint.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030612627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030612627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 689

EP - 693

JO - Psychiatric Services

JF - Psychiatric Services

SN - 1075-2730

IS - 5

ER -