Proximal suction tracheotomy tube reduces aspiration volume

Heather M S Coffman, Catherine J. Rees, Ann E F Sievers, Peter C Belafsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations


Objective: Conventional cuffed tracheotomy tubes do not prevent aspiration of secretions. Aspiration of saliva may be decreased with the use of a subglottic suction port. Study Design: Prospective. Methods: Shiley Disposable Cuffed Tracheotomy (DCT) tubes sizes 4, 6, and 8 (Tyco Healthcare, Pleasanton, CA) were compared to Portex Blue Line Ultra Suctionaid (BLUS) tracheotomy tubes sizes 6, 7, and 8 (Fig 1; Smiths Medical, Watford, UK). All tubes were tested in a simulated tracheal model using 10 cc of human saliva with no suction, intermittent suction, and constant suction (15 minutes). Results: There was a significant decrease in aspirate between the larger Shiley and BLUS tubes with intermittent suction (mean 8.38 mL Shiley 6 vs 1.60 mL BLUS 7; 8.50 mL Shiley 8 vs 2.80 mL BLUS 8). There was a significant decrease in aspirate between all sizes of Shiley and BLUS tubes with continuous suction. For BLUS 7 and 8, there was a significant difference between intermittent suction (mean, 1.60 mL, 2.80 mL, respectively) and continuous suction (mean, 0.20 mL, 0.60 mL respectively). Shiley and BLUS without suction were equivalent. Conclusion: Subglottic suction tracheotomy tubes reduce the risk of aspiration beyond the cuff in a bench-top model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)441-445
Number of pages5
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology


Dive into the research topics of 'Proximal suction tracheotomy tube reduces aspiration volume'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this