Prospective randomized trial of heliox-driven continuous nebulizers in the treatment of asthma in the emergency department

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of heliox-driven continuous nebulizers in the management of moderate to severe asthma exacerbations in the Emergency Department (ED). The trial was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial in a university Emergency Department (volume 65,000 patients/year) of patients 18-55 years of age with acute asthma exacerbations. Patients were placed on continuous nebulizers driven by 70:30 heliox or air with 30% O2. Respiratory rate, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1), and Borg dyspnea scale were measured at 0 and 2 h. Disposition and patient satisfaction were also assessed. A total of 36 patients completed the study (18 heliox, 18 air). There was no difference between groups in baseline variables. There was significant interval improvement within both groups at 2 h in PEFR, FEV1, Borg, and respiratory rate. There was no significant difference between heliox 70:30 and air/oxygen in PEFR [mean between-group improvement difference 17 liters/min, 95% confidence interval (CI) -20-51], FEV1 (0.03 liters/sec, 95% CI -0.22-0.30), or respiratory rate (mean between-group improvement difference 0.5, 95% CI -2.7-3.8). There was a significant improvement in the patients' perceived dyspnea as measured by the Borg dyspnea scale at 2 h in the heliox group (1.6, 95% CI 0.3-3.0). In this trial of patients with moderate-severe asthma exacerbation, heliox-driven continuous nebulizers failed to demonstrate an improvement in respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, PEFR, or FEV1 at 2 h. However, there was a significant improvement in the patients' perceived dyspnea on heliox over air/oxygen measured by the Borg dyspnea scale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-137
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Hospital Emergency Service
Asthma
Peak Expiratory Flow Rate
Dyspnea
Forced Expiratory Volume
Respiratory Rate
Air
Confidence Intervals
Oxygen
Therapeutics
heliox
Patient Satisfaction

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • Continuous nebulization
  • Heliox
  • Randomized trial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

@article{6936aa4cc6b44e7393182a228a5b467e,
title = "Prospective randomized trial of heliox-driven continuous nebulizers in the treatment of asthma in the emergency department",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of heliox-driven continuous nebulizers in the management of moderate to severe asthma exacerbations in the Emergency Department (ED). The trial was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial in a university Emergency Department (volume 65,000 patients/year) of patients 18-55 years of age with acute asthma exacerbations. Patients were placed on continuous nebulizers driven by 70:30 heliox or air with 30{\%} O2. Respiratory rate, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1), and Borg dyspnea scale were measured at 0 and 2 h. Disposition and patient satisfaction were also assessed. A total of 36 patients completed the study (18 heliox, 18 air). There was no difference between groups in baseline variables. There was significant interval improvement within both groups at 2 h in PEFR, FEV1, Borg, and respiratory rate. There was no significant difference between heliox 70:30 and air/oxygen in PEFR [mean between-group improvement difference 17 liters/min, 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) -20-51], FEV1 (0.03 liters/sec, 95{\%} CI -0.22-0.30), or respiratory rate (mean between-group improvement difference 0.5, 95{\%} CI -2.7-3.8). There was a significant improvement in the patients' perceived dyspnea as measured by the Borg dyspnea scale at 2 h in the heliox group (1.6, 95{\%} CI 0.3-3.0). In this trial of patients with moderate-severe asthma exacerbation, heliox-driven continuous nebulizers failed to demonstrate an improvement in respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, PEFR, or FEV1 at 2 h. However, there was a significant improvement in the patients' perceived dyspnea on heliox over air/oxygen measured by the Borg dyspnea scale.",
keywords = "Asthma, Continuous nebulization, Heliox, Randomized trial",
author = "Rose, {John S} and Panacek, {Edward A} and Penny Miller",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S0736-4679(01)00454-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "133--137",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective randomized trial of heliox-driven continuous nebulizers in the treatment of asthma in the emergency department

AU - Rose, John S

AU - Panacek, Edward A

AU - Miller, Penny

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of heliox-driven continuous nebulizers in the management of moderate to severe asthma exacerbations in the Emergency Department (ED). The trial was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial in a university Emergency Department (volume 65,000 patients/year) of patients 18-55 years of age with acute asthma exacerbations. Patients were placed on continuous nebulizers driven by 70:30 heliox or air with 30% O2. Respiratory rate, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1), and Borg dyspnea scale were measured at 0 and 2 h. Disposition and patient satisfaction were also assessed. A total of 36 patients completed the study (18 heliox, 18 air). There was no difference between groups in baseline variables. There was significant interval improvement within both groups at 2 h in PEFR, FEV1, Borg, and respiratory rate. There was no significant difference between heliox 70:30 and air/oxygen in PEFR [mean between-group improvement difference 17 liters/min, 95% confidence interval (CI) -20-51], FEV1 (0.03 liters/sec, 95% CI -0.22-0.30), or respiratory rate (mean between-group improvement difference 0.5, 95% CI -2.7-3.8). There was a significant improvement in the patients' perceived dyspnea as measured by the Borg dyspnea scale at 2 h in the heliox group (1.6, 95% CI 0.3-3.0). In this trial of patients with moderate-severe asthma exacerbation, heliox-driven continuous nebulizers failed to demonstrate an improvement in respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, PEFR, or FEV1 at 2 h. However, there was a significant improvement in the patients' perceived dyspnea on heliox over air/oxygen measured by the Borg dyspnea scale.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of heliox-driven continuous nebulizers in the management of moderate to severe asthma exacerbations in the Emergency Department (ED). The trial was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial in a university Emergency Department (volume 65,000 patients/year) of patients 18-55 years of age with acute asthma exacerbations. Patients were placed on continuous nebulizers driven by 70:30 heliox or air with 30% O2. Respiratory rate, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1), and Borg dyspnea scale were measured at 0 and 2 h. Disposition and patient satisfaction were also assessed. A total of 36 patients completed the study (18 heliox, 18 air). There was no difference between groups in baseline variables. There was significant interval improvement within both groups at 2 h in PEFR, FEV1, Borg, and respiratory rate. There was no significant difference between heliox 70:30 and air/oxygen in PEFR [mean between-group improvement difference 17 liters/min, 95% confidence interval (CI) -20-51], FEV1 (0.03 liters/sec, 95% CI -0.22-0.30), or respiratory rate (mean between-group improvement difference 0.5, 95% CI -2.7-3.8). There was a significant improvement in the patients' perceived dyspnea as measured by the Borg dyspnea scale at 2 h in the heliox group (1.6, 95% CI 0.3-3.0). In this trial of patients with moderate-severe asthma exacerbation, heliox-driven continuous nebulizers failed to demonstrate an improvement in respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, PEFR, or FEV1 at 2 h. However, there was a significant improvement in the patients' perceived dyspnea on heliox over air/oxygen measured by the Borg dyspnea scale.

KW - Asthma

KW - Continuous nebulization

KW - Heliox

KW - Randomized trial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036175461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036175461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0736-4679(01)00454-1

DO - 10.1016/S0736-4679(01)00454-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 11858916

AN - SCOPUS:0036175461

VL - 22

SP - 133

EP - 137

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 2

ER -