Prospective payments in a regional trauma center: The case for recognition of the transfer patient in diagnostic related groups

Jason A. London, Matthew R. Rosengart, Gregory Jurkovich, Avery B. Nathens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Transfer patients (TP) differ from patients transported directly from the field (DP) by virtue of their complexity and delays to definitive care, factors that might impact on costs and resource utilization and aggravate the adverse selection that already threatens TC reimbursement. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study where patients admitted to a Level I trauma center were classified as a TP or DP. Crude and adjusted total costs, complications, length of stay, and proportion of DRG outliers were compared across the two cohorts. Results: Among 8,665 patients, 40% were transferred. TP were more likely to be DRG outliers (15% versus 10%, p < 0.001). Costs in 65% of the DRGs were higher in the TP. Rates of complications and length of stay were significantly greater in the TP. Conclusion: There are systematic differences in resource consumption between transferred patients and patients transported directly from the field. These differences render conventional DRG-based mechanisms of reimbursement inadequate, suggesting a need for recognition of the transfer patient as a distinct entity by payers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)390-395
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Transfer
Trauma Centers
Diagnosis-Related Groups
DRG Outliers
Costs and Cost Analysis
Reimbursement Mechanisms
Length of Stay
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Cost and cost analysis
  • Diagnosis related groups
  • dvg
  • Health care costs
  • Outliers
  • Prospective payment system
  • Retrospective studies
  • Trauma centers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Prospective payments in a regional trauma center : The case for recognition of the transfer patient in diagnostic related groups. / London, Jason A.; Rosengart, Matthew R.; Jurkovich, Gregory; Nathens, Avery B.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 60, No. 2, 01.01.2006, p. 390-395.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bbcc4d0c15484753a13d738642eb4523,
title = "Prospective payments in a regional trauma center: The case for recognition of the transfer patient in diagnostic related groups",
abstract = "Background: Transfer patients (TP) differ from patients transported directly from the field (DP) by virtue of their complexity and delays to definitive care, factors that might impact on costs and resource utilization and aggravate the adverse selection that already threatens TC reimbursement. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study where patients admitted to a Level I trauma center were classified as a TP or DP. Crude and adjusted total costs, complications, length of stay, and proportion of DRG outliers were compared across the two cohorts. Results: Among 8,665 patients, 40{\%} were transferred. TP were more likely to be DRG outliers (15{\%} versus 10{\%}, p < 0.001). Costs in 65{\%} of the DRGs were higher in the TP. Rates of complications and length of stay were significantly greater in the TP. Conclusion: There are systematic differences in resource consumption between transferred patients and patients transported directly from the field. These differences render conventional DRG-based mechanisms of reimbursement inadequate, suggesting a need for recognition of the transfer patient as a distinct entity by payers.",
keywords = "Cost and cost analysis, Diagnosis related groups, dvg, Health care costs, Outliers, Prospective payment system, Retrospective studies, Trauma centers",
author = "London, {Jason A.} and Rosengart, {Matthew R.} and Gregory Jurkovich and Nathens, {Avery B.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.ta.0000203586.66214.34",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "390--395",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective payments in a regional trauma center

T2 - The case for recognition of the transfer patient in diagnostic related groups

AU - London, Jason A.

AU - Rosengart, Matthew R.

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Nathens, Avery B.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Background: Transfer patients (TP) differ from patients transported directly from the field (DP) by virtue of their complexity and delays to definitive care, factors that might impact on costs and resource utilization and aggravate the adverse selection that already threatens TC reimbursement. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study where patients admitted to a Level I trauma center were classified as a TP or DP. Crude and adjusted total costs, complications, length of stay, and proportion of DRG outliers were compared across the two cohorts. Results: Among 8,665 patients, 40% were transferred. TP were more likely to be DRG outliers (15% versus 10%, p < 0.001). Costs in 65% of the DRGs were higher in the TP. Rates of complications and length of stay were significantly greater in the TP. Conclusion: There are systematic differences in resource consumption between transferred patients and patients transported directly from the field. These differences render conventional DRG-based mechanisms of reimbursement inadequate, suggesting a need for recognition of the transfer patient as a distinct entity by payers.

AB - Background: Transfer patients (TP) differ from patients transported directly from the field (DP) by virtue of their complexity and delays to definitive care, factors that might impact on costs and resource utilization and aggravate the adverse selection that already threatens TC reimbursement. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study where patients admitted to a Level I trauma center were classified as a TP or DP. Crude and adjusted total costs, complications, length of stay, and proportion of DRG outliers were compared across the two cohorts. Results: Among 8,665 patients, 40% were transferred. TP were more likely to be DRG outliers (15% versus 10%, p < 0.001). Costs in 65% of the DRGs were higher in the TP. Rates of complications and length of stay were significantly greater in the TP. Conclusion: There are systematic differences in resource consumption between transferred patients and patients transported directly from the field. These differences render conventional DRG-based mechanisms of reimbursement inadequate, suggesting a need for recognition of the transfer patient as a distinct entity by payers.

KW - Cost and cost analysis

KW - Diagnosis related groups

KW - dvg

KW - Health care costs

KW - Outliers

KW - Prospective payment system

KW - Retrospective studies

KW - Trauma centers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646111730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646111730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ta.0000203586.66214.34

DO - 10.1097/01.ta.0000203586.66214.34

M3 - Article

C2 - 16508501

AN - SCOPUS:33646111730

VL - 60

SP - 390

EP - 395

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 2

ER -