Prospective assessment of pregnancy intentions using a single-versus a multi-item measure

Megan L. Kavanaugh, Eleanor Schwarz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

CONTEXT: Traditional measures of pregnancy intentions that are dichotomous and retrospective do not fully capture the complexity surrounding women's plans to become pregnant. METHODS: During January-June 2008, 249 women aged 15-44 awaiting pregnancy test results at family planning clinics in Pittsburgh completed a survey containing both single- and multi-item measures of pregnancy intentions. Chi-square analyses were used to assess differences between subgroups of women. RESULTS: Few women were trying to become or planning for pregnancy (11% on the single-item measure; 20% on the multi-item measure), while approximately one-third of the sample were not trying to become or planning for pregnancy (31% on the single-item and 36% on the multi-item measure). The single-item measure categorized more women as ambivalent about pregnancy (58%) than did the multi-item measure (44%). Of women categorized as ambivalent by the single-item measure, 62% were also categorized as ambivalent by the multi-item measure. Overall, 68% of responses to the two measures were concordant. With both measures, women who were not planning or trying for pregnancy were more likely than those who were planning for pregnancy or who were ambivalent to indicate that they planned to have an abortion if their test was positive (27-29% vs. 0-2%). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective assessment of pregnancy intention with either a single- or a multi-item measure may allow for a more nuanced assessment of pregnancy intention than current measures. The multi-item measure may reduce the number of women categorized as ambivalent and aid the development of targeted contraceptive and preconception counseling interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)238-243
Number of pages6
JournalPerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

pregnancy
Pregnancy
planning
Pregnancy Tests
Family Planning Services
Contraceptive Agents
contraceptive
Counseling
abortion
family planning
counseling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Prospective assessment of pregnancy intentions using a single-versus a multi-item measure. / Kavanaugh, Megan L.; Schwarz, Eleanor.

In: Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.12.2009, p. 238-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fbd6a8f228f044c48f2379c907ada57d,
title = "Prospective assessment of pregnancy intentions using a single-versus a multi-item measure",
abstract = "CONTEXT: Traditional measures of pregnancy intentions that are dichotomous and retrospective do not fully capture the complexity surrounding women's plans to become pregnant. METHODS: During January-June 2008, 249 women aged 15-44 awaiting pregnancy test results at family planning clinics in Pittsburgh completed a survey containing both single- and multi-item measures of pregnancy intentions. Chi-square analyses were used to assess differences between subgroups of women. RESULTS: Few women were trying to become or planning for pregnancy (11{\%} on the single-item measure; 20{\%} on the multi-item measure), while approximately one-third of the sample were not trying to become or planning for pregnancy (31{\%} on the single-item and 36{\%} on the multi-item measure). The single-item measure categorized more women as ambivalent about pregnancy (58{\%}) than did the multi-item measure (44{\%}). Of women categorized as ambivalent by the single-item measure, 62{\%} were also categorized as ambivalent by the multi-item measure. Overall, 68{\%} of responses to the two measures were concordant. With both measures, women who were not planning or trying for pregnancy were more likely than those who were planning for pregnancy or who were ambivalent to indicate that they planned to have an abortion if their test was positive (27-29{\%} vs. 0-2{\%}). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective assessment of pregnancy intention with either a single- or a multi-item measure may allow for a more nuanced assessment of pregnancy intention than current measures. The multi-item measure may reduce the number of women categorized as ambivalent and aid the development of targeted contraceptive and preconception counseling interventions.",
author = "Kavanaugh, {Megan L.} and Eleanor Schwarz",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1363/4123809",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "238--243",
journal = "Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health",
issn = "1538-6341",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective assessment of pregnancy intentions using a single-versus a multi-item measure

AU - Kavanaugh, Megan L.

AU - Schwarz, Eleanor

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - CONTEXT: Traditional measures of pregnancy intentions that are dichotomous and retrospective do not fully capture the complexity surrounding women's plans to become pregnant. METHODS: During January-June 2008, 249 women aged 15-44 awaiting pregnancy test results at family planning clinics in Pittsburgh completed a survey containing both single- and multi-item measures of pregnancy intentions. Chi-square analyses were used to assess differences between subgroups of women. RESULTS: Few women were trying to become or planning for pregnancy (11% on the single-item measure; 20% on the multi-item measure), while approximately one-third of the sample were not trying to become or planning for pregnancy (31% on the single-item and 36% on the multi-item measure). The single-item measure categorized more women as ambivalent about pregnancy (58%) than did the multi-item measure (44%). Of women categorized as ambivalent by the single-item measure, 62% were also categorized as ambivalent by the multi-item measure. Overall, 68% of responses to the two measures were concordant. With both measures, women who were not planning or trying for pregnancy were more likely than those who were planning for pregnancy or who were ambivalent to indicate that they planned to have an abortion if their test was positive (27-29% vs. 0-2%). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective assessment of pregnancy intention with either a single- or a multi-item measure may allow for a more nuanced assessment of pregnancy intention than current measures. The multi-item measure may reduce the number of women categorized as ambivalent and aid the development of targeted contraceptive and preconception counseling interventions.

AB - CONTEXT: Traditional measures of pregnancy intentions that are dichotomous and retrospective do not fully capture the complexity surrounding women's plans to become pregnant. METHODS: During January-June 2008, 249 women aged 15-44 awaiting pregnancy test results at family planning clinics in Pittsburgh completed a survey containing both single- and multi-item measures of pregnancy intentions. Chi-square analyses were used to assess differences between subgroups of women. RESULTS: Few women were trying to become or planning for pregnancy (11% on the single-item measure; 20% on the multi-item measure), while approximately one-third of the sample were not trying to become or planning for pregnancy (31% on the single-item and 36% on the multi-item measure). The single-item measure categorized more women as ambivalent about pregnancy (58%) than did the multi-item measure (44%). Of women categorized as ambivalent by the single-item measure, 62% were also categorized as ambivalent by the multi-item measure. Overall, 68% of responses to the two measures were concordant. With both measures, women who were not planning or trying for pregnancy were more likely than those who were planning for pregnancy or who were ambivalent to indicate that they planned to have an abortion if their test was positive (27-29% vs. 0-2%). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective assessment of pregnancy intention with either a single- or a multi-item measure may allow for a more nuanced assessment of pregnancy intention than current measures. The multi-item measure may reduce the number of women categorized as ambivalent and aid the development of targeted contraceptive and preconception counseling interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71749083154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71749083154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1363/4123809

DO - 10.1363/4123809

M3 - Article

C2 - 20444179

AN - SCOPUS:71749083154

VL - 41

SP - 238

EP - 243

JO - Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

JF - Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

SN - 1538-6341

IS - 4

ER -