Proprioceptive function is more sensitive than motor function to desflurane anesthesia

Linda S Barter, Laurie O. Mark, Joseph F. Antognini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the effects of sub-immobilizing anesthetic doses on movement will identify target neural circuits for investigation as sites of action for anesthetic-induced immobility. METHODS: Eleven pithed Northern Leopard frogs received 0, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 times the 50% effective dose for production of immobility (ED 50) of desflurane and a further 7 received 0 and 0.4 ED 50 desflurane in random order. An electric stimulus applied to the forelimb elicited a hindlimb wiping reflex that was captured on video for later analysis. Isometric tension developed in the hindlimb during the 30 s stimulus application was measured. RESULTS: Compared to 0 ED50, 0.4 ED 50 desflurane significantly increased latency to wipe 0.8 (0.1, 4.0) to 17.3 (0.4, 30.0) s (median [min max]), distance traveled by the hindfoot 0.42 (0.09, 1.82) to 0.89 (0.16, 4.82) m, and proximity of the hindfoot to stimulus 1 (0, 5) to 7 (1, 40) mm. It did not alter hindlimb maximum velocity or isometric tension but significantly reduced total hindlimb force 7.3 (1.7, 23.6) to 3.2 (1.4, 13.8) N. s proportionate to a reduced number of movements from 12 (3, 28) to 8 (2, 14). From 0.4 to 0.8 ED 50, motor depressant effects of desflurane became apparent with significant reductions in maximum tension from 2.0 (0.6, 5.5) to 0.8 (0.1, 1.6) N and total force from 3.2 (1.4, 13.8) to 0.9 (0.0, 2.5) N.s. CONCLUSIONS: Proprioceptive function is more sensitive to anesthetic-induced depression than motor function in frogs. This suggests that the most anestheticsensitive component of the spinal neural circuitry underlying movement generation in response to noxious stimulus is prior to the level of the motoneuron.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)867-872
Number of pages6
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume108
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hindlimb
Anesthesia
Anesthetics
Rana pipiens
Forelimb
Motor Neurons
Anura
Reflex
Depression
desflurane

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Proprioceptive function is more sensitive than motor function to desflurane anesthesia. / Barter, Linda S; Mark, Laurie O.; Antognini, Joseph F.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 108, No. 3, 03.2009, p. 867-872.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barter, Linda S ; Mark, Laurie O. ; Antognini, Joseph F. / Proprioceptive function is more sensitive than motor function to desflurane anesthesia. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2009 ; Vol. 108, No. 3. pp. 867-872.
@article{20b4d2aed5d84edfb6fe1103f0bbbce5,
title = "Proprioceptive function is more sensitive than motor function to desflurane anesthesia",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Evaluating the effects of sub-immobilizing anesthetic doses on movement will identify target neural circuits for investigation as sites of action for anesthetic-induced immobility. METHODS: Eleven pithed Northern Leopard frogs received 0, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 times the 50{\%} effective dose for production of immobility (ED 50) of desflurane and a further 7 received 0 and 0.4 ED 50 desflurane in random order. An electric stimulus applied to the forelimb elicited a hindlimb wiping reflex that was captured on video for later analysis. Isometric tension developed in the hindlimb during the 30 s stimulus application was measured. RESULTS: Compared to 0 ED50, 0.4 ED 50 desflurane significantly increased latency to wipe 0.8 (0.1, 4.0) to 17.3 (0.4, 30.0) s (median [min max]), distance traveled by the hindfoot 0.42 (0.09, 1.82) to 0.89 (0.16, 4.82) m, and proximity of the hindfoot to stimulus 1 (0, 5) to 7 (1, 40) mm. It did not alter hindlimb maximum velocity or isometric tension but significantly reduced total hindlimb force 7.3 (1.7, 23.6) to 3.2 (1.4, 13.8) N. s proportionate to a reduced number of movements from 12 (3, 28) to 8 (2, 14). From 0.4 to 0.8 ED 50, motor depressant effects of desflurane became apparent with significant reductions in maximum tension from 2.0 (0.6, 5.5) to 0.8 (0.1, 1.6) N and total force from 3.2 (1.4, 13.8) to 0.9 (0.0, 2.5) N.s. CONCLUSIONS: Proprioceptive function is more sensitive to anesthetic-induced depression than motor function in frogs. This suggests that the most anestheticsensitive component of the spinal neural circuitry underlying movement generation in response to noxious stimulus is prior to the level of the motoneuron.",
author = "Barter, {Linda S} and Mark, {Laurie O.} and Antognini, {Joseph F.}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1213/ane.0b013e318193eabe",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "867--872",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proprioceptive function is more sensitive than motor function to desflurane anesthesia

AU - Barter, Linda S

AU - Mark, Laurie O.

AU - Antognini, Joseph F.

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - BACKGROUND: Evaluating the effects of sub-immobilizing anesthetic doses on movement will identify target neural circuits for investigation as sites of action for anesthetic-induced immobility. METHODS: Eleven pithed Northern Leopard frogs received 0, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 times the 50% effective dose for production of immobility (ED 50) of desflurane and a further 7 received 0 and 0.4 ED 50 desflurane in random order. An electric stimulus applied to the forelimb elicited a hindlimb wiping reflex that was captured on video for later analysis. Isometric tension developed in the hindlimb during the 30 s stimulus application was measured. RESULTS: Compared to 0 ED50, 0.4 ED 50 desflurane significantly increased latency to wipe 0.8 (0.1, 4.0) to 17.3 (0.4, 30.0) s (median [min max]), distance traveled by the hindfoot 0.42 (0.09, 1.82) to 0.89 (0.16, 4.82) m, and proximity of the hindfoot to stimulus 1 (0, 5) to 7 (1, 40) mm. It did not alter hindlimb maximum velocity or isometric tension but significantly reduced total hindlimb force 7.3 (1.7, 23.6) to 3.2 (1.4, 13.8) N. s proportionate to a reduced number of movements from 12 (3, 28) to 8 (2, 14). From 0.4 to 0.8 ED 50, motor depressant effects of desflurane became apparent with significant reductions in maximum tension from 2.0 (0.6, 5.5) to 0.8 (0.1, 1.6) N and total force from 3.2 (1.4, 13.8) to 0.9 (0.0, 2.5) N.s. CONCLUSIONS: Proprioceptive function is more sensitive to anesthetic-induced depression than motor function in frogs. This suggests that the most anestheticsensitive component of the spinal neural circuitry underlying movement generation in response to noxious stimulus is prior to the level of the motoneuron.

AB - BACKGROUND: Evaluating the effects of sub-immobilizing anesthetic doses on movement will identify target neural circuits for investigation as sites of action for anesthetic-induced immobility. METHODS: Eleven pithed Northern Leopard frogs received 0, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 times the 50% effective dose for production of immobility (ED 50) of desflurane and a further 7 received 0 and 0.4 ED 50 desflurane in random order. An electric stimulus applied to the forelimb elicited a hindlimb wiping reflex that was captured on video for later analysis. Isometric tension developed in the hindlimb during the 30 s stimulus application was measured. RESULTS: Compared to 0 ED50, 0.4 ED 50 desflurane significantly increased latency to wipe 0.8 (0.1, 4.0) to 17.3 (0.4, 30.0) s (median [min max]), distance traveled by the hindfoot 0.42 (0.09, 1.82) to 0.89 (0.16, 4.82) m, and proximity of the hindfoot to stimulus 1 (0, 5) to 7 (1, 40) mm. It did not alter hindlimb maximum velocity or isometric tension but significantly reduced total hindlimb force 7.3 (1.7, 23.6) to 3.2 (1.4, 13.8) N. s proportionate to a reduced number of movements from 12 (3, 28) to 8 (2, 14). From 0.4 to 0.8 ED 50, motor depressant effects of desflurane became apparent with significant reductions in maximum tension from 2.0 (0.6, 5.5) to 0.8 (0.1, 1.6) N and total force from 3.2 (1.4, 13.8) to 0.9 (0.0, 2.5) N.s. CONCLUSIONS: Proprioceptive function is more sensitive to anesthetic-induced depression than motor function in frogs. This suggests that the most anestheticsensitive component of the spinal neural circuitry underlying movement generation in response to noxious stimulus is prior to the level of the motoneuron.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61949193859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61949193859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/ane.0b013e318193eabe

DO - 10.1213/ane.0b013e318193eabe

M3 - Article

C2 - 19224795

AN - SCOPUS:61949193859

VL - 108

SP - 867

EP - 872

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 3

ER -