Promoting end-of-life discussions in advanced cancer

Effects of patient coaching and question prompt lists

Rachel A. Rodenbach, Kim Brandes, Kevin Fiscella, Richard L Kravitz, Phyllis N. Butow, Adam Walczak, Paul R. Duberstein, Peter Sullivan, Beth Hoh, Guibo Xing, Sandy Plumb, Ronald M. Epstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To build on results of a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a combined patient-oncologist intervention to improve communication in advanced cancer, we conducted a post hoc analysis of the patient intervention component, a previsit patient coaching session that used a question prompt list (QPL). We hypothesized that intervention-group participants would bring up more QPL-related topics, particularly prognosis-related topics, during the subsequent oncologist visit. Patients and Methods This cluster RCT with 170 patients who had advanced nonhematologic cancer (and their caregivers) recruited from practices of 24 participating oncologists in western New York. Intervention-group oncologists (n = 12) received individualized communication training; up to 10 of their patients (n = 84) received a previsit individualized communication coaching session that incorporated a QPL. Controlgroup oncologists (n = 12) and patients (n = 86) received no interventions. Topics of interest identified by patients during the coaching session were summarized from coaching notes; one office visit after the coaching session was audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by using linear regression modeling for group differences. Results Compared with controls, more than twice as many intervention-group participants brought up QPLrelated topics during their office visits (70.2% v 32.6%; P < .001). Patients in the intervention group were nearly three times more likely to ask about prognosis (16.7% v 5.8%; P =.03). Of 262 topics of interest identified during coaching, 158 (60.3%) were QPL related; 20 (12.7%) addressed prognosis. Overall, patients in the intervention group brought up 82.4% of topics of interest during the office visit. Conclusion A combined coaching and QPL intervention was effective to help patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers identify and bring up topics of concern, including prognosis, during their subsequent oncologist visits. Considering that most patients are misinformed about prognosis, more intensive steps are needed to better promote such discussions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)842-851
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume35
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 10 2017

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Office Visits
Communication
Caregivers
Mentoring
Randomized Controlled Trials
Oncologists
Linear Models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Promoting end-of-life discussions in advanced cancer : Effects of patient coaching and question prompt lists. / Rodenbach, Rachel A.; Brandes, Kim; Fiscella, Kevin; Kravitz, Richard L; Butow, Phyllis N.; Walczak, Adam; Duberstein, Paul R.; Sullivan, Peter; Hoh, Beth; Xing, Guibo; Plumb, Sandy; Epstein, Ronald M.

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 35, No. 8, 10.03.2017, p. 842-851.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rodenbach, RA, Brandes, K, Fiscella, K, Kravitz, RL, Butow, PN, Walczak, A, Duberstein, PR, Sullivan, P, Hoh, B, Xing, G, Plumb, S & Epstein, RM 2017, 'Promoting end-of-life discussions in advanced cancer: Effects of patient coaching and question prompt lists', Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 842-851. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5651
Rodenbach, Rachel A. ; Brandes, Kim ; Fiscella, Kevin ; Kravitz, Richard L ; Butow, Phyllis N. ; Walczak, Adam ; Duberstein, Paul R. ; Sullivan, Peter ; Hoh, Beth ; Xing, Guibo ; Plumb, Sandy ; Epstein, Ronald M. / Promoting end-of-life discussions in advanced cancer : Effects of patient coaching and question prompt lists. In: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2017 ; Vol. 35, No. 8. pp. 842-851.
@article{286d89e4735f4315b4fe76c117c16fe6,
title = "Promoting end-of-life discussions in advanced cancer: Effects of patient coaching and question prompt lists",
abstract = "Purpose To build on results of a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a combined patient-oncologist intervention to improve communication in advanced cancer, we conducted a post hoc analysis of the patient intervention component, a previsit patient coaching session that used a question prompt list (QPL). We hypothesized that intervention-group participants would bring up more QPL-related topics, particularly prognosis-related topics, during the subsequent oncologist visit. Patients and Methods This cluster RCT with 170 patients who had advanced nonhematologic cancer (and their caregivers) recruited from practices of 24 participating oncologists in western New York. Intervention-group oncologists (n = 12) received individualized communication training; up to 10 of their patients (n = 84) received a previsit individualized communication coaching session that incorporated a QPL. Controlgroup oncologists (n = 12) and patients (n = 86) received no interventions. Topics of interest identified by patients during the coaching session were summarized from coaching notes; one office visit after the coaching session was audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by using linear regression modeling for group differences. Results Compared with controls, more than twice as many intervention-group participants brought up QPLrelated topics during their office visits (70.2{\%} v 32.6{\%}; P < .001). Patients in the intervention group were nearly three times more likely to ask about prognosis (16.7{\%} v 5.8{\%}; P =.03). Of 262 topics of interest identified during coaching, 158 (60.3{\%}) were QPL related; 20 (12.7{\%}) addressed prognosis. Overall, patients in the intervention group brought up 82.4{\%} of topics of interest during the office visit. Conclusion A combined coaching and QPL intervention was effective to help patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers identify and bring up topics of concern, including prognosis, during their subsequent oncologist visits. Considering that most patients are misinformed about prognosis, more intensive steps are needed to better promote such discussions.",
author = "Rodenbach, {Rachel A.} and Kim Brandes and Kevin Fiscella and Kravitz, {Richard L} and Butow, {Phyllis N.} and Adam Walczak and Duberstein, {Paul R.} and Peter Sullivan and Beth Hoh and Guibo Xing and Sandy Plumb and Epstein, {Ronald M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5651",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "842--851",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0732-183X",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promoting end-of-life discussions in advanced cancer

T2 - Effects of patient coaching and question prompt lists

AU - Rodenbach, Rachel A.

AU - Brandes, Kim

AU - Fiscella, Kevin

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

AU - Butow, Phyllis N.

AU - Walczak, Adam

AU - Duberstein, Paul R.

AU - Sullivan, Peter

AU - Hoh, Beth

AU - Xing, Guibo

AU - Plumb, Sandy

AU - Epstein, Ronald M.

PY - 2017/3/10

Y1 - 2017/3/10

N2 - Purpose To build on results of a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a combined patient-oncologist intervention to improve communication in advanced cancer, we conducted a post hoc analysis of the patient intervention component, a previsit patient coaching session that used a question prompt list (QPL). We hypothesized that intervention-group participants would bring up more QPL-related topics, particularly prognosis-related topics, during the subsequent oncologist visit. Patients and Methods This cluster RCT with 170 patients who had advanced nonhematologic cancer (and their caregivers) recruited from practices of 24 participating oncologists in western New York. Intervention-group oncologists (n = 12) received individualized communication training; up to 10 of their patients (n = 84) received a previsit individualized communication coaching session that incorporated a QPL. Controlgroup oncologists (n = 12) and patients (n = 86) received no interventions. Topics of interest identified by patients during the coaching session were summarized from coaching notes; one office visit after the coaching session was audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by using linear regression modeling for group differences. Results Compared with controls, more than twice as many intervention-group participants brought up QPLrelated topics during their office visits (70.2% v 32.6%; P < .001). Patients in the intervention group were nearly three times more likely to ask about prognosis (16.7% v 5.8%; P =.03). Of 262 topics of interest identified during coaching, 158 (60.3%) were QPL related; 20 (12.7%) addressed prognosis. Overall, patients in the intervention group brought up 82.4% of topics of interest during the office visit. Conclusion A combined coaching and QPL intervention was effective to help patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers identify and bring up topics of concern, including prognosis, during their subsequent oncologist visits. Considering that most patients are misinformed about prognosis, more intensive steps are needed to better promote such discussions.

AB - Purpose To build on results of a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a combined patient-oncologist intervention to improve communication in advanced cancer, we conducted a post hoc analysis of the patient intervention component, a previsit patient coaching session that used a question prompt list (QPL). We hypothesized that intervention-group participants would bring up more QPL-related topics, particularly prognosis-related topics, during the subsequent oncologist visit. Patients and Methods This cluster RCT with 170 patients who had advanced nonhematologic cancer (and their caregivers) recruited from practices of 24 participating oncologists in western New York. Intervention-group oncologists (n = 12) received individualized communication training; up to 10 of their patients (n = 84) received a previsit individualized communication coaching session that incorporated a QPL. Controlgroup oncologists (n = 12) and patients (n = 86) received no interventions. Topics of interest identified by patients during the coaching session were summarized from coaching notes; one office visit after the coaching session was audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by using linear regression modeling for group differences. Results Compared with controls, more than twice as many intervention-group participants brought up QPLrelated topics during their office visits (70.2% v 32.6%; P < .001). Patients in the intervention group were nearly three times more likely to ask about prognosis (16.7% v 5.8%; P =.03). Of 262 topics of interest identified during coaching, 158 (60.3%) were QPL related; 20 (12.7%) addressed prognosis. Overall, patients in the intervention group brought up 82.4% of topics of interest during the office visit. Conclusion A combined coaching and QPL intervention was effective to help patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers identify and bring up topics of concern, including prognosis, during their subsequent oncologist visits. Considering that most patients are misinformed about prognosis, more intensive steps are needed to better promote such discussions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015749076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015749076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5651

DO - 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5651

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 842

EP - 851

JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0732-183X

IS - 8

ER -