Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue- on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry

C. A. Johnson, A. J. Adams, E. J. Casson, James D Brandt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

239 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. - To determine whether blue-on-yellow perimetry reveals progression of glaucomatous damage before it is evident with standard white- on-white perimetry. Design. - A Humphrey field analyzer (Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro, Calif) was modified to perform blue-on-yellow perimetry to isolate and measure the sensitivity of short wavelength- sensitive mechanisms. Participants were tested annually with standard white- on-white automated perimetry and blue-on-yellow automated perimetry for 5 years. Patients. - Sixteen patients with early glaucomatous visual field loss in one or both eyes and 62 age-matched normal control subjects. Results. - At baseline, 25 (78.1%) of the 32 eyes exhibited larger deficits with blue-on- yellow perimetry, five (15.6%) had equivalent loss with both tests, and two (6.3%) had larger deficits with standard white-on-white perimetry. Seven (21.9%) of the 32 eyes demonstrated evidence of progressive visual field loss with standard white-on-white perimetry in 5 years, while the other 25 eyes (78.1%) were relatively stable. Deficits with blue-on-yellow perimetry were twice as large as deficits with white-on-white perimetry in the stable group and were three to four times as large in the group with progressive field loss. Conclusions. - Blue-on-yellow perimetry is effective in predicting which patients with early glaucomatous visual field loss are most likely to have progressive loss. The rate of progressive loss is greater with blue-on- yellow perimetry than with standard white-on-white perimetry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)651-656
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Ophthalmology
Volume111
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Visual Field Tests
Visual Fields

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue- on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry. / Johnson, C. A.; Adams, A. J.; Casson, E. J.; Brandt, James D.

In: Archives of Ophthalmology, Vol. 111, No. 5, 1993, p. 651-656.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f5a75229121645f0aab6ff9b9aaa1394,
title = "Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue- on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry",
abstract = "Objective. - To determine whether blue-on-yellow perimetry reveals progression of glaucomatous damage before it is evident with standard white- on-white perimetry. Design. - A Humphrey field analyzer (Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro, Calif) was modified to perform blue-on-yellow perimetry to isolate and measure the sensitivity of short wavelength- sensitive mechanisms. Participants were tested annually with standard white- on-white automated perimetry and blue-on-yellow automated perimetry for 5 years. Patients. - Sixteen patients with early glaucomatous visual field loss in one or both eyes and 62 age-matched normal control subjects. Results. - At baseline, 25 (78.1{\%}) of the 32 eyes exhibited larger deficits with blue-on- yellow perimetry, five (15.6{\%}) had equivalent loss with both tests, and two (6.3{\%}) had larger deficits with standard white-on-white perimetry. Seven (21.9{\%}) of the 32 eyes demonstrated evidence of progressive visual field loss with standard white-on-white perimetry in 5 years, while the other 25 eyes (78.1{\%}) were relatively stable. Deficits with blue-on-yellow perimetry were twice as large as deficits with white-on-white perimetry in the stable group and were three to four times as large in the group with progressive field loss. Conclusions. - Blue-on-yellow perimetry is effective in predicting which patients with early glaucomatous visual field loss are most likely to have progressive loss. The rate of progressive loss is greater with blue-on- yellow perimetry than with standard white-on-white perimetry.",
author = "Johnson, {C. A.} and Adams, {A. J.} and Casson, {E. J.} and Brandt, {James D}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "111",
pages = "651--656",
journal = "JAMA Ophthalmology",
issn = "2168-6165",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue- on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry

AU - Johnson, C. A.

AU - Adams, A. J.

AU - Casson, E. J.

AU - Brandt, James D

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Objective. - To determine whether blue-on-yellow perimetry reveals progression of glaucomatous damage before it is evident with standard white- on-white perimetry. Design. - A Humphrey field analyzer (Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro, Calif) was modified to perform blue-on-yellow perimetry to isolate and measure the sensitivity of short wavelength- sensitive mechanisms. Participants were tested annually with standard white- on-white automated perimetry and blue-on-yellow automated perimetry for 5 years. Patients. - Sixteen patients with early glaucomatous visual field loss in one or both eyes and 62 age-matched normal control subjects. Results. - At baseline, 25 (78.1%) of the 32 eyes exhibited larger deficits with blue-on- yellow perimetry, five (15.6%) had equivalent loss with both tests, and two (6.3%) had larger deficits with standard white-on-white perimetry. Seven (21.9%) of the 32 eyes demonstrated evidence of progressive visual field loss with standard white-on-white perimetry in 5 years, while the other 25 eyes (78.1%) were relatively stable. Deficits with blue-on-yellow perimetry were twice as large as deficits with white-on-white perimetry in the stable group and were three to four times as large in the group with progressive field loss. Conclusions. - Blue-on-yellow perimetry is effective in predicting which patients with early glaucomatous visual field loss are most likely to have progressive loss. The rate of progressive loss is greater with blue-on- yellow perimetry than with standard white-on-white perimetry.

AB - Objective. - To determine whether blue-on-yellow perimetry reveals progression of glaucomatous damage before it is evident with standard white- on-white perimetry. Design. - A Humphrey field analyzer (Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro, Calif) was modified to perform blue-on-yellow perimetry to isolate and measure the sensitivity of short wavelength- sensitive mechanisms. Participants were tested annually with standard white- on-white automated perimetry and blue-on-yellow automated perimetry for 5 years. Patients. - Sixteen patients with early glaucomatous visual field loss in one or both eyes and 62 age-matched normal control subjects. Results. - At baseline, 25 (78.1%) of the 32 eyes exhibited larger deficits with blue-on- yellow perimetry, five (15.6%) had equivalent loss with both tests, and two (6.3%) had larger deficits with standard white-on-white perimetry. Seven (21.9%) of the 32 eyes demonstrated evidence of progressive visual field loss with standard white-on-white perimetry in 5 years, while the other 25 eyes (78.1%) were relatively stable. Deficits with blue-on-yellow perimetry were twice as large as deficits with white-on-white perimetry in the stable group and were three to four times as large in the group with progressive field loss. Conclusions. - Blue-on-yellow perimetry is effective in predicting which patients with early glaucomatous visual field loss are most likely to have progressive loss. The rate of progressive loss is greater with blue-on- yellow perimetry than with standard white-on-white perimetry.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027161746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027161746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8489448

AN - SCOPUS:0027161746

VL - 111

SP - 651

EP - 656

JO - JAMA Ophthalmology

JF - JAMA Ophthalmology

SN - 2168-6165

IS - 5

ER -