Prognosis terminal: Truth-telling in the context of end-of-life care

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recent contributions to the medical literature have raised yet again the issue of whether the term terminal is an intelligible one and whether there is a consensus view of its meaning that is sufficient to justify or even require its use in discussing end-of-life care and treatment options with patients. Following a review of the history and development of informed consent, persistent problems with the communication of prognosis and the breaking of bad news are analyzed. The author argues that candid but compassionate communication between physicians and patients about prognosis is essential to informed decisions about both disease-directed (curative) and palliative therapies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)209-219
Number of pages11
JournalCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2014

Keywords

  • bad news
  • informed consent
  • prognosis
  • terminal
  • truth-telling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prognosis terminal: Truth-telling in the context of end-of-life care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this