Professional values and organizational decision making

Robert A Bell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Professions and organizations institutionalize values. These values may clash when professionals participate in organizational decision making. This article investigates the interplay between professional values and organizational purposes in the organizations that formulated federal subsidized housing policy between 1968 and 1977. Policy professionals in these organizations are committed to public finance theory, a branch of welfare economics that stresses policy criteria consistent with classical liberalism. Public finance theory was consistently influential in the President's Office of Management and Budget, briefly influential in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and never influential in Congress. Objections to it, though never codified, can be inferred from the public finance prescriptions Congress rejected. Professionals rationalize rejections of their preferred policies by defining standards of good policy as sharply distinct from political realities that legitimately affect policy determinations. This definition, however, unnecessarily compromises the integrity of organizational deliberations and, thereby, the integrity of organizational purposes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-60
Number of pages40
JournalAdministration and Society
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

public finance
finance theory
decision making
integrity
Values
welfare economics
housing development
housing policy
liberalism
deliberation
urban development
compromise
budget
medication
president
profession
management
Organizational decision making
Public finance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

Professional values and organizational decision making. / Bell, Robert A.

In: Administration and Society, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1985, p. 21-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bell, Robert A. / Professional values and organizational decision making. In: Administration and Society. 1985 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 21-60.
@article{498f9ca22cd14ce2aae564b00742971e,
title = "Professional values and organizational decision making",
abstract = "Professions and organizations institutionalize values. These values may clash when professionals participate in organizational decision making. This article investigates the interplay between professional values and organizational purposes in the organizations that formulated federal subsidized housing policy between 1968 and 1977. Policy professionals in these organizations are committed to public finance theory, a branch of welfare economics that stresses policy criteria consistent with classical liberalism. Public finance theory was consistently influential in the President's Office of Management and Budget, briefly influential in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and never influential in Congress. Objections to it, though never codified, can be inferred from the public finance prescriptions Congress rejected. Professionals rationalize rejections of their preferred policies by defining standards of good policy as sharply distinct from political realities that legitimately affect policy determinations. This definition, however, unnecessarily compromises the integrity of organizational deliberations and, thereby, the integrity of organizational purposes.",
author = "Bell, {Robert A}",
year = "1985",
doi = "10.1177/009539978501700102",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "21--60",
journal = "Administration and Society",
issn = "0095-3997",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Professional values and organizational decision making

AU - Bell, Robert A

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Professions and organizations institutionalize values. These values may clash when professionals participate in organizational decision making. This article investigates the interplay between professional values and organizational purposes in the organizations that formulated federal subsidized housing policy between 1968 and 1977. Policy professionals in these organizations are committed to public finance theory, a branch of welfare economics that stresses policy criteria consistent with classical liberalism. Public finance theory was consistently influential in the President's Office of Management and Budget, briefly influential in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and never influential in Congress. Objections to it, though never codified, can be inferred from the public finance prescriptions Congress rejected. Professionals rationalize rejections of their preferred policies by defining standards of good policy as sharply distinct from political realities that legitimately affect policy determinations. This definition, however, unnecessarily compromises the integrity of organizational deliberations and, thereby, the integrity of organizational purposes.

AB - Professions and organizations institutionalize values. These values may clash when professionals participate in organizational decision making. This article investigates the interplay between professional values and organizational purposes in the organizations that formulated federal subsidized housing policy between 1968 and 1977. Policy professionals in these organizations are committed to public finance theory, a branch of welfare economics that stresses policy criteria consistent with classical liberalism. Public finance theory was consistently influential in the President's Office of Management and Budget, briefly influential in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and never influential in Congress. Objections to it, though never codified, can be inferred from the public finance prescriptions Congress rejected. Professionals rationalize rejections of their preferred policies by defining standards of good policy as sharply distinct from political realities that legitimately affect policy determinations. This definition, however, unnecessarily compromises the integrity of organizational deliberations and, thereby, the integrity of organizational purposes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970230163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970230163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/009539978501700102

DO - 10.1177/009539978501700102

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84970230163

VL - 17

SP - 21

EP - 60

JO - Administration and Society

JF - Administration and Society

SN - 0095-3997

IS - 1

ER -