Procedural Sedation/Anesthesia Protocol among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization Procedures: The Nursing Perspective on What Is Being Practiced Nationwide

Margaret Korzewski, Bonnie Raingruber, Karen Van Leuven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The updated American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines favor conscious sedation over general anesthesia but allow that choice of anesthesia modality during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) to be based on a specific clinical scenario taking patient risk factors into consideration. Little evidence is available on who is most suited to provide anesthesia management to AIS patients undergoing these emergent endovascular interventions. Given the limited data on sedation management and the nursing role during endovascular revascularization therapy, a nationwide survey was conducted. The purpose of this study was to gather data on current practice about anesthesia/sedation management and nursing involvement during endovascular revascularization procedures among AIS patients. Methods A survey was presented in English and electronically distributed to all current and past Association for Radiologic and Imaging Nursing (ARIN) members via the ARIN List Serve with a 1-month timeline to respond to the survey questions. The survey consisted of 17 multiple-choice questions with free-text response available when applicable. Some of the multiple-choice questions allowed choice of all applicable answers. Members were asked to participate if they worked in the interventional radiology/interventional neuroradiology department and were currently involved in the management of AIS patients during endovascular revascularization therapy. Recipients had the option of whether to complete the survey or to skip any question in the survey. To maintain confidentiality, response via SurveyMonkey was considered consent. Results A total of 109 nurses responded to the survey questions. In most cases, the certified registered nurse anesthetist or the anesthesiologist was responsible for the anesthesia management of AIS patients undergoing endovascular revascularization procedures regardless of the anesthesia modality chosen (36.19%). If a registered nurse (RN) was responsible for sedation management, most of the time (33.33%) she or he felt comfortable in this role. Approximately 20% of responding RNs preferred to have the anesthesia team member in this role, 8.57% were somewhat uncomfortable in this role, and 1.90% reported being uncomfortable. Approximately 47.66% of the survey respondents confirmed that the RN providing procedural sedation was qualified to administer vasoactive drips, whereas 8.41% disagreed. Conclusions Randomized clinical trials are necessary to establish if there is truly a difference in clinical outcomes among AIS patients who are managed with general anesthesia versus conscious sedation during endovascular revascularization interventions, as well as comparing clinical outcomes of AIS patients from stroke centers where anesthesia is always provided by the anesthesia team versus stroke centers using a variety of providers. Large longitudinal studies are necessary as most facilities perform less than six procedures per month, and data will need to be correlated with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores and imaging findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-18
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Radiology Nursing
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Endovascular Procedures
Nursing
Anesthesia
Stroke
Nurses
Conscious Sedation
General Anesthesia
Nurse Anesthetists
Time Management
Surveys and Questionnaires
Interventional Radiology
Confidentiality
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Longitudinal Studies
Therapeutics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Acute ischemic stroke
  • Anesthesia
  • Endovascular revascularization
  • Endovascular treatment
  • Interventional radiology
  • Mechanical thrombectomy
  • Nursing role
  • Sedation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Procedural Sedation/Anesthesia Protocol among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization Procedures : The Nursing Perspective on What Is Being Practiced Nationwide. / Korzewski, Margaret; Raingruber, Bonnie; Van Leuven, Karen.

In: Journal of Radiology Nursing, Vol. 35, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 12-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bd5af3ff8816481e82c5533464d32a9d,
title = "Procedural Sedation/Anesthesia Protocol among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization Procedures: The Nursing Perspective on What Is Being Practiced Nationwide",
abstract = "Background The updated American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines favor conscious sedation over general anesthesia but allow that choice of anesthesia modality during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) to be based on a specific clinical scenario taking patient risk factors into consideration. Little evidence is available on who is most suited to provide anesthesia management to AIS patients undergoing these emergent endovascular interventions. Given the limited data on sedation management and the nursing role during endovascular revascularization therapy, a nationwide survey was conducted. The purpose of this study was to gather data on current practice about anesthesia/sedation management and nursing involvement during endovascular revascularization procedures among AIS patients. Methods A survey was presented in English and electronically distributed to all current and past Association for Radiologic and Imaging Nursing (ARIN) members via the ARIN List Serve with a 1-month timeline to respond to the survey questions. The survey consisted of 17 multiple-choice questions with free-text response available when applicable. Some of the multiple-choice questions allowed choice of all applicable answers. Members were asked to participate if they worked in the interventional radiology/interventional neuroradiology department and were currently involved in the management of AIS patients during endovascular revascularization therapy. Recipients had the option of whether to complete the survey or to skip any question in the survey. To maintain confidentiality, response via SurveyMonkey was considered consent. Results A total of 109 nurses responded to the survey questions. In most cases, the certified registered nurse anesthetist or the anesthesiologist was responsible for the anesthesia management of AIS patients undergoing endovascular revascularization procedures regardless of the anesthesia modality chosen (36.19{\%}). If a registered nurse (RN) was responsible for sedation management, most of the time (33.33{\%}) she or he felt comfortable in this role. Approximately 20{\%} of responding RNs preferred to have the anesthesia team member in this role, 8.57{\%} were somewhat uncomfortable in this role, and 1.90{\%} reported being uncomfortable. Approximately 47.66{\%} of the survey respondents confirmed that the RN providing procedural sedation was qualified to administer vasoactive drips, whereas 8.41{\%} disagreed. Conclusions Randomized clinical trials are necessary to establish if there is truly a difference in clinical outcomes among AIS patients who are managed with general anesthesia versus conscious sedation during endovascular revascularization interventions, as well as comparing clinical outcomes of AIS patients from stroke centers where anesthesia is always provided by the anesthesia team versus stroke centers using a variety of providers. Large longitudinal studies are necessary as most facilities perform less than six procedures per month, and data will need to be correlated with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores and imaging findings.",
keywords = "Acute ischemic stroke, Anesthesia, Endovascular revascularization, Endovascular treatment, Interventional radiology, Mechanical thrombectomy, Nursing role, Sedation",
author = "Margaret Korzewski and Bonnie Raingruber and {Van Leuven}, Karen",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jradnu.2016.01.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "12--18",
journal = "Journal of Radiology Nursing",
issn = "1546-0843",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Procedural Sedation/Anesthesia Protocol among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization Procedures

T2 - The Nursing Perspective on What Is Being Practiced Nationwide

AU - Korzewski, Margaret

AU - Raingruber, Bonnie

AU - Van Leuven, Karen

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Background The updated American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines favor conscious sedation over general anesthesia but allow that choice of anesthesia modality during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) to be based on a specific clinical scenario taking patient risk factors into consideration. Little evidence is available on who is most suited to provide anesthesia management to AIS patients undergoing these emergent endovascular interventions. Given the limited data on sedation management and the nursing role during endovascular revascularization therapy, a nationwide survey was conducted. The purpose of this study was to gather data on current practice about anesthesia/sedation management and nursing involvement during endovascular revascularization procedures among AIS patients. Methods A survey was presented in English and electronically distributed to all current and past Association for Radiologic and Imaging Nursing (ARIN) members via the ARIN List Serve with a 1-month timeline to respond to the survey questions. The survey consisted of 17 multiple-choice questions with free-text response available when applicable. Some of the multiple-choice questions allowed choice of all applicable answers. Members were asked to participate if they worked in the interventional radiology/interventional neuroradiology department and were currently involved in the management of AIS patients during endovascular revascularization therapy. Recipients had the option of whether to complete the survey or to skip any question in the survey. To maintain confidentiality, response via SurveyMonkey was considered consent. Results A total of 109 nurses responded to the survey questions. In most cases, the certified registered nurse anesthetist or the anesthesiologist was responsible for the anesthesia management of AIS patients undergoing endovascular revascularization procedures regardless of the anesthesia modality chosen (36.19%). If a registered nurse (RN) was responsible for sedation management, most of the time (33.33%) she or he felt comfortable in this role. Approximately 20% of responding RNs preferred to have the anesthesia team member in this role, 8.57% were somewhat uncomfortable in this role, and 1.90% reported being uncomfortable. Approximately 47.66% of the survey respondents confirmed that the RN providing procedural sedation was qualified to administer vasoactive drips, whereas 8.41% disagreed. Conclusions Randomized clinical trials are necessary to establish if there is truly a difference in clinical outcomes among AIS patients who are managed with general anesthesia versus conscious sedation during endovascular revascularization interventions, as well as comparing clinical outcomes of AIS patients from stroke centers where anesthesia is always provided by the anesthesia team versus stroke centers using a variety of providers. Large longitudinal studies are necessary as most facilities perform less than six procedures per month, and data will need to be correlated with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores and imaging findings.

AB - Background The updated American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines favor conscious sedation over general anesthesia but allow that choice of anesthesia modality during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) to be based on a specific clinical scenario taking patient risk factors into consideration. Little evidence is available on who is most suited to provide anesthesia management to AIS patients undergoing these emergent endovascular interventions. Given the limited data on sedation management and the nursing role during endovascular revascularization therapy, a nationwide survey was conducted. The purpose of this study was to gather data on current practice about anesthesia/sedation management and nursing involvement during endovascular revascularization procedures among AIS patients. Methods A survey was presented in English and electronically distributed to all current and past Association for Radiologic and Imaging Nursing (ARIN) members via the ARIN List Serve with a 1-month timeline to respond to the survey questions. The survey consisted of 17 multiple-choice questions with free-text response available when applicable. Some of the multiple-choice questions allowed choice of all applicable answers. Members were asked to participate if they worked in the interventional radiology/interventional neuroradiology department and were currently involved in the management of AIS patients during endovascular revascularization therapy. Recipients had the option of whether to complete the survey or to skip any question in the survey. To maintain confidentiality, response via SurveyMonkey was considered consent. Results A total of 109 nurses responded to the survey questions. In most cases, the certified registered nurse anesthetist or the anesthesiologist was responsible for the anesthesia management of AIS patients undergoing endovascular revascularization procedures regardless of the anesthesia modality chosen (36.19%). If a registered nurse (RN) was responsible for sedation management, most of the time (33.33%) she or he felt comfortable in this role. Approximately 20% of responding RNs preferred to have the anesthesia team member in this role, 8.57% were somewhat uncomfortable in this role, and 1.90% reported being uncomfortable. Approximately 47.66% of the survey respondents confirmed that the RN providing procedural sedation was qualified to administer vasoactive drips, whereas 8.41% disagreed. Conclusions Randomized clinical trials are necessary to establish if there is truly a difference in clinical outcomes among AIS patients who are managed with general anesthesia versus conscious sedation during endovascular revascularization interventions, as well as comparing clinical outcomes of AIS patients from stroke centers where anesthesia is always provided by the anesthesia team versus stroke centers using a variety of providers. Large longitudinal studies are necessary as most facilities perform less than six procedures per month, and data will need to be correlated with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores and imaging findings.

KW - Acute ischemic stroke

KW - Anesthesia

KW - Endovascular revascularization

KW - Endovascular treatment

KW - Interventional radiology

KW - Mechanical thrombectomy

KW - Nursing role

KW - Sedation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960116088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960116088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jradnu.2016.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jradnu.2016.01.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84960116088

VL - 35

SP - 12

EP - 18

JO - Journal of Radiology Nursing

JF - Journal of Radiology Nursing

SN - 1546-0843

IS - 1

ER -