Prevalent approaches to professional development in state 4-H programs

Martin Smith, Steven M. Worker, Lynn Schmitt-McQuitty, Cheryl L. Meehan, Kendra M. Lewis, Emily Schoenfelder, Kelley Brian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

High-quality 4-H programming requires effective professional development of educators. Through a mixedmethods study, we explored professional development offered through state 4-H programs. Survey results revealed that both in-person and online delivery modes were used commonly for 4-H staff and adult volunteers; for teen volunteers, in-person delivery was most common. Additionally, most professional development efforts were characterized as episodic, expert-led, and group-based (traditional approaches); the least common approaches were described as ongoing, learner-centered, and group-based (reform-based approaches). Interview data supported survey findings. Traditional approaches to professional development are considered ineffective; thus, the implementation of more reform-based professional development opportunities is recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number#4RIB2
JournalJournal of Extension
Volume55
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

reform
human being
Group
programming
expert
educator
staff
interview

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Smith, M., Worker, S. M., Schmitt-McQuitty, L., Meehan, C. L., Lewis, K. M., Schoenfelder, E., & Brian, K. (2017). Prevalent approaches to professional development in state 4-H programs. Journal of Extension, 55(4), [#4RIB2].

Prevalent approaches to professional development in state 4-H programs. / Smith, Martin; Worker, Steven M.; Schmitt-McQuitty, Lynn; Meehan, Cheryl L.; Lewis, Kendra M.; Schoenfelder, Emily; Brian, Kelley.

In: Journal of Extension, Vol. 55, No. 4, #4RIB2, 01.08.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, M, Worker, SM, Schmitt-McQuitty, L, Meehan, CL, Lewis, KM, Schoenfelder, E & Brian, K 2017, 'Prevalent approaches to professional development in state 4-H programs', Journal of Extension, vol. 55, no. 4, #4RIB2.
Smith M, Worker SM, Schmitt-McQuitty L, Meehan CL, Lewis KM, Schoenfelder E et al. Prevalent approaches to professional development in state 4-H programs. Journal of Extension. 2017 Aug 1;55(4). #4RIB2.
Smith, Martin ; Worker, Steven M. ; Schmitt-McQuitty, Lynn ; Meehan, Cheryl L. ; Lewis, Kendra M. ; Schoenfelder, Emily ; Brian, Kelley. / Prevalent approaches to professional development in state 4-H programs. In: Journal of Extension. 2017 ; Vol. 55, No. 4.
@article{809e03ef1bb1458999dfe4dff2d647ba,
title = "Prevalent approaches to professional development in state 4-H programs",
abstract = "High-quality 4-H programming requires effective professional development of educators. Through a mixedmethods study, we explored professional development offered through state 4-H programs. Survey results revealed that both in-person and online delivery modes were used commonly for 4-H staff and adult volunteers; for teen volunteers, in-person delivery was most common. Additionally, most professional development efforts were characterized as episodic, expert-led, and group-based (traditional approaches); the least common approaches were described as ongoing, learner-centered, and group-based (reform-based approaches). Interview data supported survey findings. Traditional approaches to professional development are considered ineffective; thus, the implementation of more reform-based professional development opportunities is recommended.",
author = "Martin Smith and Worker, {Steven M.} and Lynn Schmitt-McQuitty and Meehan, {Cheryl L.} and Lewis, {Kendra M.} and Emily Schoenfelder and Kelley Brian",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
journal = "Journal of Extension",
issn = "1077-5315",
publisher = "Extension Journal, Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalent approaches to professional development in state 4-H programs

AU - Smith, Martin

AU - Worker, Steven M.

AU - Schmitt-McQuitty, Lynn

AU - Meehan, Cheryl L.

AU - Lewis, Kendra M.

AU - Schoenfelder, Emily

AU - Brian, Kelley

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - High-quality 4-H programming requires effective professional development of educators. Through a mixedmethods study, we explored professional development offered through state 4-H programs. Survey results revealed that both in-person and online delivery modes were used commonly for 4-H staff and adult volunteers; for teen volunteers, in-person delivery was most common. Additionally, most professional development efforts were characterized as episodic, expert-led, and group-based (traditional approaches); the least common approaches were described as ongoing, learner-centered, and group-based (reform-based approaches). Interview data supported survey findings. Traditional approaches to professional development are considered ineffective; thus, the implementation of more reform-based professional development opportunities is recommended.

AB - High-quality 4-H programming requires effective professional development of educators. Through a mixedmethods study, we explored professional development offered through state 4-H programs. Survey results revealed that both in-person and online delivery modes were used commonly for 4-H staff and adult volunteers; for teen volunteers, in-person delivery was most common. Additionally, most professional development efforts were characterized as episodic, expert-led, and group-based (traditional approaches); the least common approaches were described as ongoing, learner-centered, and group-based (reform-based approaches). Interview data supported survey findings. Traditional approaches to professional development are considered ineffective; thus, the implementation of more reform-based professional development opportunities is recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028718860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028718860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85028718860

VL - 55

JO - Journal of Extension

JF - Journal of Extension

SN - 1077-5315

IS - 4

M1 - #4RIB2

ER -