Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on Stolzenberg et al. (2015) and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002-2011

Melanie M. Wall, Christine Mauro, Deborah S. Hasin, Katherine M. Keyes, Magdalena Cerda, Silvia S. Martins, Tianshu Feng

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by Stolzenberg et al. (2015) "The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use" concludes that "implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use". This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002-2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9-13
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Drug Policy
Volume29
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Medical Marijuana
Cannabis
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Medical marijuana laws
  • Observational data analysis
  • Pre-post tests

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws : Commentary on Stolzenberg et al. (2015) and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002-2011. / Wall, Melanie M.; Mauro, Christine; Hasin, Deborah S.; Keyes, Katherine M.; Cerda, Magdalena; Martins, Silvia S.; Feng, Tianshu.

In: International Journal of Drug Policy, Vol. 29, 01.03.2016, p. 9-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{6521c6ad2e7c40a4b18f2327326061c2,
title = "Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws: Commentary on Stolzenberg et al. (2015) and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002-2011",
abstract = "There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by Stolzenberg et al. (2015) {"}The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use{"} concludes that {"}implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use{"}. This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002-2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML.",
keywords = "Medical marijuana laws, Observational data analysis, Pre-post tests",
author = "Wall, {Melanie M.} and Christine Mauro and Hasin, {Deborah S.} and Keyes, {Katherine M.} and Magdalena Cerda and Martins, {Silvia S.} and Tianshu Feng",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "9--13",
journal = "International Journal of Drug Policy",
issn = "0955-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence of marijuana use does not differentially increase among youth after states pass medical marijuana laws

T2 - Commentary on Stolzenberg et al. (2015) and reanalysis of US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data 2002-2011

AU - Wall, Melanie M.

AU - Mauro, Christine

AU - Hasin, Deborah S.

AU - Keyes, Katherine M.

AU - Cerda, Magdalena

AU - Martins, Silvia S.

AU - Feng, Tianshu

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by Stolzenberg et al. (2015) "The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use" concludes that "implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use". This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002-2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML.

AB - There is considerable interest in the effects of medical marijuana laws (MML) on marijuana use in the USA, particularly among youth. The article by Stolzenberg et al. (2015) "The effect of medical cannabis laws on juvenile cannabis use" concludes that "implementation of medical cannabis laws increase juvenile cannabis use". This result is opposite to the findings of other studies that analysed the same US National Survey on Drug Use in Households data as well as opposite to studies analysing other national data which show no increase or even a decrease in youth marijuana use after the passage of MML. We provide a replication of the Stolzenberg et al. results and demonstrate how the comparison they are making is actually driven by differences between states with and without MML rather than being driven by pre and post-MML changes within states. We show that Stolzenberg et al. do not properly control for the fact that states that pass MML during 2002-2011 tend to already have higher past-month marijuana use before passing the MML in the first place. We further show that when within-state changes are properly considered and pre-MML prevalence is properly controlled, there is no evidence of a differential increase in past-month marijuana use in youth that can be attributed to state MML.

KW - Medical marijuana laws

KW - Observational data analysis

KW - Pre-post tests

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959105412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959105412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015

DO - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.015

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 26895950

AN - SCOPUS:84959105412

VL - 29

SP - 9

EP - 13

JO - International Journal of Drug Policy

JF - International Journal of Drug Policy

SN - 0955-3959

ER -