Prevalence and Sources of Patients' Unmet Expectations for Care

Richard L. Kravitz, Edward J. Callahan, Debora Paterniti, Deirdre Antonius, Marcia Dunham, Charles E. Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

152 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patients' expectations and the role they play in medical care are increasingly considered to be important, but the factors that influence these expectations have not been well studied. Objective: To examine the factors that influence patients' expectations for care in office practice. Design: Qualitative inquiry nested within a large clinical survey. Setting: Three general internal medicine practices in one mid-sized city in northern California. Patients: 688 patients visiting their internists' offices were surveyed (response rate, 86%); 88 patients who reported one or more omissions of care on a post-visit questionnaire and were available for a telephone interview 1 to 7 days after the visit were included in the qualitative inquiry. Measurements: Proportion of surveyed patients who reported one or more omissions of care, and qualitative analysis of the sources of patients' expectations, as determined from the telephone interviews. Interviews focused on the sources of expectations and perceptions of omission. Using an iterative process and working by consensus, investigators developed coding categories on a randomly selected 50% of the transcripts. The other 50% of the sample was used for validation. Results: The 125 patients who had unmet expectations perceived omissions that were related to physician preparation for the visit (23%), history taking (26%), physical examination (30%), diagnostic testing (28%), prescription of medication (19%), referral to specialists (26%), and physician-patient communication (15%). Unmet expectations were shaped by patients' current somatic symptoms (intensity of symptoms, functional impairment, duration of symptoms, and perceived seriousness of symptoms) (74%); perceived vulnerability to illness (related to age, family history, personal lifestyle, or previously diagnosed conditions) (50%); past experiences (personal or familial) with similar illnesses (42%); and knowledge acquired from physicians, friends, family, or the media (54%). Conclusions: Patients' expectations for care are derived from multiple sources; their complexity should discourage simple schemes for "demand management." Nevertheless, the results of this study may help physicians to take a more empathetic stance toward their patients' requests and to devise more successful strategies for clinical negotiation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)730-737
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume125
Issue number9
StatePublished - Nov 1 1996

Fingerprint

Interviews
Physicians
Patient Care
Negotiating
Family Physicians
Internal Medicine
Physical Examination
Prescriptions
Life Style
Consensus
Referral and Consultation
Communication
Research Personnel
Surveys and Questionnaires
Medically Unexplained Symptoms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Prevalence and Sources of Patients' Unmet Expectations for Care. / Kravitz, Richard L.; Callahan, Edward J.; Paterniti, Debora; Antonius, Deirdre; Dunham, Marcia; Lewis, Charles E.

In: Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 125, No. 9, 01.11.1996, p. 730-737.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kravitz, Richard L. ; Callahan, Edward J. ; Paterniti, Debora ; Antonius, Deirdre ; Dunham, Marcia ; Lewis, Charles E. / Prevalence and Sources of Patients' Unmet Expectations for Care. In: Annals of Internal Medicine. 1996 ; Vol. 125, No. 9. pp. 730-737.
@article{75de478659ef45d7bbbc13ee8d97bbae,
title = "Prevalence and Sources of Patients' Unmet Expectations for Care",
abstract = "Background: Patients' expectations and the role they play in medical care are increasingly considered to be important, but the factors that influence these expectations have not been well studied. Objective: To examine the factors that influence patients' expectations for care in office practice. Design: Qualitative inquiry nested within a large clinical survey. Setting: Three general internal medicine practices in one mid-sized city in northern California. Patients: 688 patients visiting their internists' offices were surveyed (response rate, 86{\%}); 88 patients who reported one or more omissions of care on a post-visit questionnaire and were available for a telephone interview 1 to 7 days after the visit were included in the qualitative inquiry. Measurements: Proportion of surveyed patients who reported one or more omissions of care, and qualitative analysis of the sources of patients' expectations, as determined from the telephone interviews. Interviews focused on the sources of expectations and perceptions of omission. Using an iterative process and working by consensus, investigators developed coding categories on a randomly selected 50{\%} of the transcripts. The other 50{\%} of the sample was used for validation. Results: The 125 patients who had unmet expectations perceived omissions that were related to physician preparation for the visit (23{\%}), history taking (26{\%}), physical examination (30{\%}), diagnostic testing (28{\%}), prescription of medication (19{\%}), referral to specialists (26{\%}), and physician-patient communication (15{\%}). Unmet expectations were shaped by patients' current somatic symptoms (intensity of symptoms, functional impairment, duration of symptoms, and perceived seriousness of symptoms) (74{\%}); perceived vulnerability to illness (related to age, family history, personal lifestyle, or previously diagnosed conditions) (50{\%}); past experiences (personal or familial) with similar illnesses (42{\%}); and knowledge acquired from physicians, friends, family, or the media (54{\%}). Conclusions: Patients' expectations for care are derived from multiple sources; their complexity should discourage simple schemes for {"}demand management.{"} Nevertheless, the results of this study may help physicians to take a more empathetic stance toward their patients' requests and to devise more successful strategies for clinical negotiation.",
author = "Kravitz, {Richard L.} and Callahan, {Edward J.} and Debora Paterniti and Deirdre Antonius and Marcia Dunham and Lewis, {Charles E.}",
year = "1996",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "730--737",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence and Sources of Patients' Unmet Expectations for Care

AU - Kravitz, Richard L.

AU - Callahan, Edward J.

AU - Paterniti, Debora

AU - Antonius, Deirdre

AU - Dunham, Marcia

AU - Lewis, Charles E.

PY - 1996/11/1

Y1 - 1996/11/1

N2 - Background: Patients' expectations and the role they play in medical care are increasingly considered to be important, but the factors that influence these expectations have not been well studied. Objective: To examine the factors that influence patients' expectations for care in office practice. Design: Qualitative inquiry nested within a large clinical survey. Setting: Three general internal medicine practices in one mid-sized city in northern California. Patients: 688 patients visiting their internists' offices were surveyed (response rate, 86%); 88 patients who reported one or more omissions of care on a post-visit questionnaire and were available for a telephone interview 1 to 7 days after the visit were included in the qualitative inquiry. Measurements: Proportion of surveyed patients who reported one or more omissions of care, and qualitative analysis of the sources of patients' expectations, as determined from the telephone interviews. Interviews focused on the sources of expectations and perceptions of omission. Using an iterative process and working by consensus, investigators developed coding categories on a randomly selected 50% of the transcripts. The other 50% of the sample was used for validation. Results: The 125 patients who had unmet expectations perceived omissions that were related to physician preparation for the visit (23%), history taking (26%), physical examination (30%), diagnostic testing (28%), prescription of medication (19%), referral to specialists (26%), and physician-patient communication (15%). Unmet expectations were shaped by patients' current somatic symptoms (intensity of symptoms, functional impairment, duration of symptoms, and perceived seriousness of symptoms) (74%); perceived vulnerability to illness (related to age, family history, personal lifestyle, or previously diagnosed conditions) (50%); past experiences (personal or familial) with similar illnesses (42%); and knowledge acquired from physicians, friends, family, or the media (54%). Conclusions: Patients' expectations for care are derived from multiple sources; their complexity should discourage simple schemes for "demand management." Nevertheless, the results of this study may help physicians to take a more empathetic stance toward their patients' requests and to devise more successful strategies for clinical negotiation.

AB - Background: Patients' expectations and the role they play in medical care are increasingly considered to be important, but the factors that influence these expectations have not been well studied. Objective: To examine the factors that influence patients' expectations for care in office practice. Design: Qualitative inquiry nested within a large clinical survey. Setting: Three general internal medicine practices in one mid-sized city in northern California. Patients: 688 patients visiting their internists' offices were surveyed (response rate, 86%); 88 patients who reported one or more omissions of care on a post-visit questionnaire and were available for a telephone interview 1 to 7 days after the visit were included in the qualitative inquiry. Measurements: Proportion of surveyed patients who reported one or more omissions of care, and qualitative analysis of the sources of patients' expectations, as determined from the telephone interviews. Interviews focused on the sources of expectations and perceptions of omission. Using an iterative process and working by consensus, investigators developed coding categories on a randomly selected 50% of the transcripts. The other 50% of the sample was used for validation. Results: The 125 patients who had unmet expectations perceived omissions that were related to physician preparation for the visit (23%), history taking (26%), physical examination (30%), diagnostic testing (28%), prescription of medication (19%), referral to specialists (26%), and physician-patient communication (15%). Unmet expectations were shaped by patients' current somatic symptoms (intensity of symptoms, functional impairment, duration of symptoms, and perceived seriousness of symptoms) (74%); perceived vulnerability to illness (related to age, family history, personal lifestyle, or previously diagnosed conditions) (50%); past experiences (personal or familial) with similar illnesses (42%); and knowledge acquired from physicians, friends, family, or the media (54%). Conclusions: Patients' expectations for care are derived from multiple sources; their complexity should discourage simple schemes for "demand management." Nevertheless, the results of this study may help physicians to take a more empathetic stance toward their patients' requests and to devise more successful strategies for clinical negotiation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030293350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030293350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8929006

AN - SCOPUS:0030293350

VL - 125

SP - 730

EP - 737

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 9

ER -