Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy

Elizabeth Miller, Michele R. Decker, Heather L. McCauley, Daniel J Tancredi, Rebecca R. Levenson, Jeffrey Waldman, Phyllis Schoenwald, Jay G. Silverman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

272 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Reproductive control including pregnancy coercion (coercion by male partners to become pregnant) and birth control sabotage (partner interference with contraception) may be associated with partner violence and risk for unintended pregnancy among young adult females utilizing family planning clinic services. Study Design: A cross-sectional survey was administered to females ages 16-29 years seeking care in five family planning clinics in Northern California (N=1278). Results: Fifty-three percent of respondents reported physical or sexual partner violence, 19% reported experiencing pregnancy coercion and 15% reported birth control sabotage. One third of respondents reporting partner violence (35%) also reported reproductive control. Both pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage were associated with unintended pregnancy (AOR 1.83, 95% CI 1.36-2.46, and AOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.14-2.20, respectively). In analyses stratified by partner violence exposure, associations of reproductive control with unintended pregnancy persisted only among women with a history of partner violence. Conclusions: Pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage are common among young women utilizing family planning clinics, and in the context of partner violence, are associated with increased risk for unintended pregnancy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)316-322
Number of pages7
JournalContraception
Volume81
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Coercion
Pregnancy
Contraception
Violence
Family Planning Services
Intimate Partner Violence
Sexual Partners
Sex Offenses
Young Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Contraception, barrier
  • Domestic Violence
  • Family Planning Services
  • Pregnancy, unwanted

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Miller, E., Decker, M. R., McCauley, H. L., Tancredi, D. J., Levenson, R. R., Waldman, J., ... Silverman, J. G. (2010). Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception, 81(4), 316-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.004

Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. / Miller, Elizabeth; Decker, Michele R.; McCauley, Heather L.; Tancredi, Daniel J; Levenson, Rebecca R.; Waldman, Jeffrey; Schoenwald, Phyllis; Silverman, Jay G.

In: Contraception, Vol. 81, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 316-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, E, Decker, MR, McCauley, HL, Tancredi, DJ, Levenson, RR, Waldman, J, Schoenwald, P & Silverman, JG 2010, 'Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy', Contraception, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 316-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.004
Miller, Elizabeth ; Decker, Michele R. ; McCauley, Heather L. ; Tancredi, Daniel J ; Levenson, Rebecca R. ; Waldman, Jeffrey ; Schoenwald, Phyllis ; Silverman, Jay G. / Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. In: Contraception. 2010 ; Vol. 81, No. 4. pp. 316-322.
@article{b624ab5917f14e37bff9a3a0256c0c78,
title = "Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy",
abstract = "Background: Reproductive control including pregnancy coercion (coercion by male partners to become pregnant) and birth control sabotage (partner interference with contraception) may be associated with partner violence and risk for unintended pregnancy among young adult females utilizing family planning clinic services. Study Design: A cross-sectional survey was administered to females ages 16-29 years seeking care in five family planning clinics in Northern California (N=1278). Results: Fifty-three percent of respondents reported physical or sexual partner violence, 19{\%} reported experiencing pregnancy coercion and 15{\%} reported birth control sabotage. One third of respondents reporting partner violence (35{\%}) also reported reproductive control. Both pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage were associated with unintended pregnancy (AOR 1.83, 95{\%} CI 1.36-2.46, and AOR 1.58, 95{\%} CI 1.14-2.20, respectively). In analyses stratified by partner violence exposure, associations of reproductive control with unintended pregnancy persisted only among women with a history of partner violence. Conclusions: Pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage are common among young women utilizing family planning clinics, and in the context of partner violence, are associated with increased risk for unintended pregnancy.",
keywords = "Contraception, barrier, Domestic Violence, Family Planning Services, Pregnancy, unwanted",
author = "Elizabeth Miller and Decker, {Michele R.} and McCauley, {Heather L.} and Tancredi, {Daniel J} and Levenson, {Rebecca R.} and Jeffrey Waldman and Phyllis Schoenwald and Silverman, {Jay G.}",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "316--322",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy

AU - Miller, Elizabeth

AU - Decker, Michele R.

AU - McCauley, Heather L.

AU - Tancredi, Daniel J

AU - Levenson, Rebecca R.

AU - Waldman, Jeffrey

AU - Schoenwald, Phyllis

AU - Silverman, Jay G.

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Background: Reproductive control including pregnancy coercion (coercion by male partners to become pregnant) and birth control sabotage (partner interference with contraception) may be associated with partner violence and risk for unintended pregnancy among young adult females utilizing family planning clinic services. Study Design: A cross-sectional survey was administered to females ages 16-29 years seeking care in five family planning clinics in Northern California (N=1278). Results: Fifty-three percent of respondents reported physical or sexual partner violence, 19% reported experiencing pregnancy coercion and 15% reported birth control sabotage. One third of respondents reporting partner violence (35%) also reported reproductive control. Both pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage were associated with unintended pregnancy (AOR 1.83, 95% CI 1.36-2.46, and AOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.14-2.20, respectively). In analyses stratified by partner violence exposure, associations of reproductive control with unintended pregnancy persisted only among women with a history of partner violence. Conclusions: Pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage are common among young women utilizing family planning clinics, and in the context of partner violence, are associated with increased risk for unintended pregnancy.

AB - Background: Reproductive control including pregnancy coercion (coercion by male partners to become pregnant) and birth control sabotage (partner interference with contraception) may be associated with partner violence and risk for unintended pregnancy among young adult females utilizing family planning clinic services. Study Design: A cross-sectional survey was administered to females ages 16-29 years seeking care in five family planning clinics in Northern California (N=1278). Results: Fifty-three percent of respondents reported physical or sexual partner violence, 19% reported experiencing pregnancy coercion and 15% reported birth control sabotage. One third of respondents reporting partner violence (35%) also reported reproductive control. Both pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage were associated with unintended pregnancy (AOR 1.83, 95% CI 1.36-2.46, and AOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.14-2.20, respectively). In analyses stratified by partner violence exposure, associations of reproductive control with unintended pregnancy persisted only among women with a history of partner violence. Conclusions: Pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage are common among young women utilizing family planning clinics, and in the context of partner violence, are associated with increased risk for unintended pregnancy.

KW - Contraception, barrier

KW - Domestic Violence

KW - Family Planning Services

KW - Pregnancy, unwanted

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949263117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949263117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.004

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 316

EP - 322

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 4

ER -