Preeclampsia

Is induction of labor more successful?

Elly M J Xenakis, Jeanna M. Piper, Nancy T Field, Deborah Conway, Oded Langer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that preeclamptic women are more readily inducible than are nonpreeclamptic women, regardless of cervical condition. Methods: One hundred eighty-three preeclamptic women and 461 nonpreeclamptic women requiring labor induction were studied prospectively. Patients were categorized by Bishop score, parity, gestational age, and method of induction. Outcome variables were success of induction and cesarean delivery rates. Results: Failed induction was significantly more common in the preeclamptic group (8.2% versus 1.7%; odds ratio [OR] 5.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.97, 13.28), as was cesarean delivery (28% versus 16%; OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.36, 3.18). When controlled by logistic regression for Bishop score, parity, method of induction, epidural anesthesia, macrosomia, and gestational age, a fourfold higher risk of failed induction and a twofold higher risk of cesarean delivery were found in the preeclamptic group. Conclusions: Induction of labor in preeclamptic women has a higher risk of failure and consequently of cesarean delivery than in nonpreeclamptic women. The vast majority of patients achieve vaginal delivery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)600-603
Number of pages4
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume89
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Induced Labor
Pre-Eclampsia
Parity
Gestational Age
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Epidural Anesthesia
Logistic Models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Preeclampsia : Is induction of labor more successful? / Xenakis, Elly M J; Piper, Jeanna M.; Field, Nancy T; Conway, Deborah; Langer, Oded.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 89, No. 4, 04.1997, p. 600-603.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Xenakis, Elly M J ; Piper, Jeanna M. ; Field, Nancy T ; Conway, Deborah ; Langer, Oded. / Preeclampsia : Is induction of labor more successful?. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1997 ; Vol. 89, No. 4. pp. 600-603.
@article{cf9cb9d82272496691f88f990957c4c0,
title = "Preeclampsia: Is induction of labor more successful?",
abstract = "Objective: To test the hypothesis that preeclamptic women are more readily inducible than are nonpreeclamptic women, regardless of cervical condition. Methods: One hundred eighty-three preeclamptic women and 461 nonpreeclamptic women requiring labor induction were studied prospectively. Patients were categorized by Bishop score, parity, gestational age, and method of induction. Outcome variables were success of induction and cesarean delivery rates. Results: Failed induction was significantly more common in the preeclamptic group (8.2{\%} versus 1.7{\%}; odds ratio [OR] 5.06; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.97, 13.28), as was cesarean delivery (28{\%} versus 16{\%}; OR 2.09; 95{\%} CI 1.36, 3.18). When controlled by logistic regression for Bishop score, parity, method of induction, epidural anesthesia, macrosomia, and gestational age, a fourfold higher risk of failed induction and a twofold higher risk of cesarean delivery were found in the preeclamptic group. Conclusions: Induction of labor in preeclamptic women has a higher risk of failure and consequently of cesarean delivery than in nonpreeclamptic women. The vast majority of patients achieve vaginal delivery.",
author = "Xenakis, {Elly M J} and Piper, {Jeanna M.} and Field, {Nancy T} and Deborah Conway and Oded Langer",
year = "1997",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00043-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "600--603",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preeclampsia

T2 - Is induction of labor more successful?

AU - Xenakis, Elly M J

AU - Piper, Jeanna M.

AU - Field, Nancy T

AU - Conway, Deborah

AU - Langer, Oded

PY - 1997/4

Y1 - 1997/4

N2 - Objective: To test the hypothesis that preeclamptic women are more readily inducible than are nonpreeclamptic women, regardless of cervical condition. Methods: One hundred eighty-three preeclamptic women and 461 nonpreeclamptic women requiring labor induction were studied prospectively. Patients were categorized by Bishop score, parity, gestational age, and method of induction. Outcome variables were success of induction and cesarean delivery rates. Results: Failed induction was significantly more common in the preeclamptic group (8.2% versus 1.7%; odds ratio [OR] 5.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.97, 13.28), as was cesarean delivery (28% versus 16%; OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.36, 3.18). When controlled by logistic regression for Bishop score, parity, method of induction, epidural anesthesia, macrosomia, and gestational age, a fourfold higher risk of failed induction and a twofold higher risk of cesarean delivery were found in the preeclamptic group. Conclusions: Induction of labor in preeclamptic women has a higher risk of failure and consequently of cesarean delivery than in nonpreeclamptic women. The vast majority of patients achieve vaginal delivery.

AB - Objective: To test the hypothesis that preeclamptic women are more readily inducible than are nonpreeclamptic women, regardless of cervical condition. Methods: One hundred eighty-three preeclamptic women and 461 nonpreeclamptic women requiring labor induction were studied prospectively. Patients were categorized by Bishop score, parity, gestational age, and method of induction. Outcome variables were success of induction and cesarean delivery rates. Results: Failed induction was significantly more common in the preeclamptic group (8.2% versus 1.7%; odds ratio [OR] 5.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.97, 13.28), as was cesarean delivery (28% versus 16%; OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.36, 3.18). When controlled by logistic regression for Bishop score, parity, method of induction, epidural anesthesia, macrosomia, and gestational age, a fourfold higher risk of failed induction and a twofold higher risk of cesarean delivery were found in the preeclamptic group. Conclusions: Induction of labor in preeclamptic women has a higher risk of failure and consequently of cesarean delivery than in nonpreeclamptic women. The vast majority of patients achieve vaginal delivery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031127193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031127193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00043-4

DO - 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00043-4

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 600

EP - 603

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 4

ER -