Predictive validity of a 2-question alcohol screen at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up

James G. Linakis, Julie R. Bromberg, T. Charles Casper, Thomas H. Chun, Michael J. Mello, Rachel Richards, Colette C. Mull, Rohit P. Shenoi, Cheryl Vance, Fahd Ahmad, Lalit Bajaj, Kathleen M. Brown, Lauren S. Chernick, Daniel M. Cohen, Joel Fein, Timothy Horeczko, Michael N. Levas, Brett McAninch, Michael C. Monuteaux, Jackie Grupp-PhelanElizabeth C. Powell, Alexander Rogers, Brian Suffoletto, J. Michael Dean, Anthony Spirito

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) 2-question screen abstract is a valid adolescent alcohol screening tool. No studies have examined if this tool predicts future alcohol problems. We conducted a study at 16 pediatric emergency departments to determine the tool's predictive validity for alcohol misuse and alcohol use disorders (AUDs). METHODS: Participants (N = 4834) completed a baseline assessment battery. A subsample of participants completed the battery at 1, 2, and 3 years follow up. RESULTS: Of the 2209 participants assigned to follow-up, 1611 (73%) completed a 1-year followup, 1591 (72%) completed a 2-year follow-up, and 1377 (62%) completed a 3-year follow-up. The differences in AUDs between baseline NIAAA screen nondrinkers and lower-risk drinkers were statistically significant at 1 year (P = .0002), 2 years (P, .0001), and 3 years (P = .0005), as were the differences between moderate-and highest-risk drinkers at 1 and 2 years (P, .0001 and P = .0088, respectively) but not at 3 years (P = .0758). The best combined score for sensitivity (86.2% at 1 year, 75.6% at 2 years, and 60.0% at 3 years) and specificity (78.1% at 1 year, 79.2% at 2 years, and 80.0% at 3 years) was achieved by using "lower risk" and higher as a cutoff for the prediction of a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The NIAAA 2-question screen can accurately characterize adolescent risk for future AUDs. Future studies are needed to determine optimaluse of the screen.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere20182001
JournalPediatrics
Volume143
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U.S.)
Alcohols
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Hospital Emergency Service
Pediatrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Linakis, J. G., Bromberg, J. R., Casper, T. C., Chun, T. H., Mello, M. J., Richards, R., ... Spirito, A. (2019). Predictive validity of a 2-question alcohol screen at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up. Pediatrics, 143(3), [e20182001]. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-2001

Predictive validity of a 2-question alcohol screen at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up. / Linakis, James G.; Bromberg, Julie R.; Casper, T. Charles; Chun, Thomas H.; Mello, Michael J.; Richards, Rachel; Mull, Colette C.; Shenoi, Rohit P.; Vance, Cheryl; Ahmad, Fahd; Bajaj, Lalit; Brown, Kathleen M.; Chernick, Lauren S.; Cohen, Daniel M.; Fein, Joel; Horeczko, Timothy; Levas, Michael N.; McAninch, Brett; Monuteaux, Michael C.; Grupp-Phelan, Jackie; Powell, Elizabeth C.; Rogers, Alexander; Suffoletto, Brian; Dean, J. Michael; Spirito, Anthony.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 143, No. 3, e20182001, 01.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Linakis, JG, Bromberg, JR, Casper, TC, Chun, TH, Mello, MJ, Richards, R, Mull, CC, Shenoi, RP, Vance, C, Ahmad, F, Bajaj, L, Brown, KM, Chernick, LS, Cohen, DM, Fein, J, Horeczko, T, Levas, MN, McAninch, B, Monuteaux, MC, Grupp-Phelan, J, Powell, EC, Rogers, A, Suffoletto, B, Dean, JM & Spirito, A 2019, 'Predictive validity of a 2-question alcohol screen at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up', Pediatrics, vol. 143, no. 3, e20182001. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-2001
Linakis JG, Bromberg JR, Casper TC, Chun TH, Mello MJ, Richards R et al. Predictive validity of a 2-question alcohol screen at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up. Pediatrics. 2019 Mar 1;143(3). e20182001. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-2001
Linakis, James G. ; Bromberg, Julie R. ; Casper, T. Charles ; Chun, Thomas H. ; Mello, Michael J. ; Richards, Rachel ; Mull, Colette C. ; Shenoi, Rohit P. ; Vance, Cheryl ; Ahmad, Fahd ; Bajaj, Lalit ; Brown, Kathleen M. ; Chernick, Lauren S. ; Cohen, Daniel M. ; Fein, Joel ; Horeczko, Timothy ; Levas, Michael N. ; McAninch, Brett ; Monuteaux, Michael C. ; Grupp-Phelan, Jackie ; Powell, Elizabeth C. ; Rogers, Alexander ; Suffoletto, Brian ; Dean, J. Michael ; Spirito, Anthony. / Predictive validity of a 2-question alcohol screen at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up. In: Pediatrics. 2019 ; Vol. 143, No. 3.
@article{ea421b2c3bc74ad792d152046e9fd5ed,
title = "Predictive validity of a 2-question alcohol screen at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) 2-question screen abstract is a valid adolescent alcohol screening tool. No studies have examined if this tool predicts future alcohol problems. We conducted a study at 16 pediatric emergency departments to determine the tool's predictive validity for alcohol misuse and alcohol use disorders (AUDs). METHODS: Participants (N = 4834) completed a baseline assessment battery. A subsample of participants completed the battery at 1, 2, and 3 years follow up. RESULTS: Of the 2209 participants assigned to follow-up, 1611 (73{\%}) completed a 1-year followup, 1591 (72{\%}) completed a 2-year follow-up, and 1377 (62{\%}) completed a 3-year follow-up. The differences in AUDs between baseline NIAAA screen nondrinkers and lower-risk drinkers were statistically significant at 1 year (P = .0002), 2 years (P, .0001), and 3 years (P = .0005), as were the differences between moderate-and highest-risk drinkers at 1 and 2 years (P, .0001 and P = .0088, respectively) but not at 3 years (P = .0758). The best combined score for sensitivity (86.2{\%} at 1 year, 75.6{\%} at 2 years, and 60.0{\%} at 3 years) and specificity (78.1{\%} at 1 year, 79.2{\%} at 2 years, and 80.0{\%} at 3 years) was achieved by using {"}lower risk{"} and higher as a cutoff for the prediction of a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The NIAAA 2-question screen can accurately characterize adolescent risk for future AUDs. Future studies are needed to determine optimaluse of the screen.",
author = "Linakis, {James G.} and Bromberg, {Julie R.} and Casper, {T. Charles} and Chun, {Thomas H.} and Mello, {Michael J.} and Rachel Richards and Mull, {Colette C.} and Shenoi, {Rohit P.} and Cheryl Vance and Fahd Ahmad and Lalit Bajaj and Brown, {Kathleen M.} and Chernick, {Lauren S.} and Cohen, {Daniel M.} and Joel Fein and Timothy Horeczko and Levas, {Michael N.} and Brett McAninch and Monuteaux, {Michael C.} and Jackie Grupp-Phelan and Powell, {Elizabeth C.} and Alexander Rogers and Brian Suffoletto and Dean, {J. Michael} and Anthony Spirito",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2018-2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "143",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictive validity of a 2-question alcohol screen at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up

AU - Linakis, James G.

AU - Bromberg, Julie R.

AU - Casper, T. Charles

AU - Chun, Thomas H.

AU - Mello, Michael J.

AU - Richards, Rachel

AU - Mull, Colette C.

AU - Shenoi, Rohit P.

AU - Vance, Cheryl

AU - Ahmad, Fahd

AU - Bajaj, Lalit

AU - Brown, Kathleen M.

AU - Chernick, Lauren S.

AU - Cohen, Daniel M.

AU - Fein, Joel

AU - Horeczko, Timothy

AU - Levas, Michael N.

AU - McAninch, Brett

AU - Monuteaux, Michael C.

AU - Grupp-Phelan, Jackie

AU - Powell, Elizabeth C.

AU - Rogers, Alexander

AU - Suffoletto, Brian

AU - Dean, J. Michael

AU - Spirito, Anthony

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) 2-question screen abstract is a valid adolescent alcohol screening tool. No studies have examined if this tool predicts future alcohol problems. We conducted a study at 16 pediatric emergency departments to determine the tool's predictive validity for alcohol misuse and alcohol use disorders (AUDs). METHODS: Participants (N = 4834) completed a baseline assessment battery. A subsample of participants completed the battery at 1, 2, and 3 years follow up. RESULTS: Of the 2209 participants assigned to follow-up, 1611 (73%) completed a 1-year followup, 1591 (72%) completed a 2-year follow-up, and 1377 (62%) completed a 3-year follow-up. The differences in AUDs between baseline NIAAA screen nondrinkers and lower-risk drinkers were statistically significant at 1 year (P = .0002), 2 years (P, .0001), and 3 years (P = .0005), as were the differences between moderate-and highest-risk drinkers at 1 and 2 years (P, .0001 and P = .0088, respectively) but not at 3 years (P = .0758). The best combined score for sensitivity (86.2% at 1 year, 75.6% at 2 years, and 60.0% at 3 years) and specificity (78.1% at 1 year, 79.2% at 2 years, and 80.0% at 3 years) was achieved by using "lower risk" and higher as a cutoff for the prediction of a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The NIAAA 2-question screen can accurately characterize adolescent risk for future AUDs. Future studies are needed to determine optimaluse of the screen.

AB - BACKGROUND: The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) 2-question screen abstract is a valid adolescent alcohol screening tool. No studies have examined if this tool predicts future alcohol problems. We conducted a study at 16 pediatric emergency departments to determine the tool's predictive validity for alcohol misuse and alcohol use disorders (AUDs). METHODS: Participants (N = 4834) completed a baseline assessment battery. A subsample of participants completed the battery at 1, 2, and 3 years follow up. RESULTS: Of the 2209 participants assigned to follow-up, 1611 (73%) completed a 1-year followup, 1591 (72%) completed a 2-year follow-up, and 1377 (62%) completed a 3-year follow-up. The differences in AUDs between baseline NIAAA screen nondrinkers and lower-risk drinkers were statistically significant at 1 year (P = .0002), 2 years (P, .0001), and 3 years (P = .0005), as were the differences between moderate-and highest-risk drinkers at 1 and 2 years (P, .0001 and P = .0088, respectively) but not at 3 years (P = .0758). The best combined score for sensitivity (86.2% at 1 year, 75.6% at 2 years, and 60.0% at 3 years) and specificity (78.1% at 1 year, 79.2% at 2 years, and 80.0% at 3 years) was achieved by using "lower risk" and higher as a cutoff for the prediction of a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The NIAAA 2-question screen can accurately characterize adolescent risk for future AUDs. Future studies are needed to determine optimaluse of the screen.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062765914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062765914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2018-2001

DO - 10.1542/peds.2018-2001

M3 - Article

C2 - 30783022

AN - SCOPUS:85062765914

VL - 143

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 3

M1 - e20182001

ER -