Predicting muscle forces of individuals with hemiparesis following stroke

Trisha M. Kesar, Jun Ding, Anthony S. Wexler, Ramu Perumal, Ryan Maladen, Stuart A. Binder-Macleod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) has been used to improve function in individuals with hemiparesis following stroke. An ideal functional electrical stimulation (FES) system needs an accurate mathematical model capable of designing subject and task-specific stimulation patterns. Such a model was previously developed in our laboratory and shown to predict the isometric forces produced by the quadriceps femoris muscles of able-bodied individuals and individuals with spinal cord injury in response to a wide range of clinically relevant stimulation frequencies and patterns. The aim of this study was to test our isometric muscle force model on the quadriceps femoris, ankle dorsiflexor, and ankle plantar-flexor muscles of individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis. Methods. Subjects were seated on a force dynamometer and isometric forces were measured in response to a range of stimulation frequencies (10 to 80-Hz) and 3 different patterns. Subject-specific model parameter values were obtained by fitting the measured force responses from 2 stimulation trains. The model parameters thus obtained were then used to obtain predicted forces for a range of frequencies and patterns. Predicted and measured forces were compared using intra-class correlation coefficients, r2 values, and model error relative to the physiological error (variability of measured forces). Results. Results showed excellent agreement between measured and predicted force-time responses (r2 >0.80), peak forces (ICCs>0.84), and force-time integrals (ICCs>0.82) for the quadriceps, dorsiflexor, and plantar-fexor muscles. The model error was within or below the +95% confidence interval of the physiological error for >88% comparisons between measured and predicted forces. Conclusion. Our results show that the model has potential to be incorporated as a feed-forward controller for predicting subject-specific stimulation patterns during FES.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number7
JournalJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Quadriceps Muscle
Paresis
Electric Stimulation
Stroke
Ankle
Muscles
Spinal Cord Injuries
Theoretical Models
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Kesar, T. M., Ding, J., Wexler, A. S., Perumal, R., Maladen, R., & Binder-Macleod, S. A. (2008). Predicting muscle forces of individuals with hemiparesis following stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 5, [7]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-5-7

Predicting muscle forces of individuals with hemiparesis following stroke. / Kesar, Trisha M.; Ding, Jun; Wexler, Anthony S.; Perumal, Ramu; Maladen, Ryan; Binder-Macleod, Stuart A.

In: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, Vol. 5, 7, 2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kesar, Trisha M. ; Ding, Jun ; Wexler, Anthony S. ; Perumal, Ramu ; Maladen, Ryan ; Binder-Macleod, Stuart A. / Predicting muscle forces of individuals with hemiparesis following stroke. In: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2008 ; Vol. 5.
@article{7d9f34b0dfb54261b588ade5dc81205a,
title = "Predicting muscle forces of individuals with hemiparesis following stroke",
abstract = "Background. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) has been used to improve function in individuals with hemiparesis following stroke. An ideal functional electrical stimulation (FES) system needs an accurate mathematical model capable of designing subject and task-specific stimulation patterns. Such a model was previously developed in our laboratory and shown to predict the isometric forces produced by the quadriceps femoris muscles of able-bodied individuals and individuals with spinal cord injury in response to a wide range of clinically relevant stimulation frequencies and patterns. The aim of this study was to test our isometric muscle force model on the quadriceps femoris, ankle dorsiflexor, and ankle plantar-flexor muscles of individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis. Methods. Subjects were seated on a force dynamometer and isometric forces were measured in response to a range of stimulation frequencies (10 to 80-Hz) and 3 different patterns. Subject-specific model parameter values were obtained by fitting the measured force responses from 2 stimulation trains. The model parameters thus obtained were then used to obtain predicted forces for a range of frequencies and patterns. Predicted and measured forces were compared using intra-class correlation coefficients, r2 values, and model error relative to the physiological error (variability of measured forces). Results. Results showed excellent agreement between measured and predicted force-time responses (r2 >0.80), peak forces (ICCs>0.84), and force-time integrals (ICCs>0.82) for the quadriceps, dorsiflexor, and plantar-fexor muscles. The model error was within or below the +95{\%} confidence interval of the physiological error for >88{\%} comparisons between measured and predicted forces. Conclusion. Our results show that the model has potential to be incorporated as a feed-forward controller for predicting subject-specific stimulation patterns during FES.",
author = "Kesar, {Trisha M.} and Jun Ding and Wexler, {Anthony S.} and Ramu Perumal and Ryan Maladen and Binder-Macleod, {Stuart A.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1186/1743-0003-5-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation",
issn = "1743-0003",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting muscle forces of individuals with hemiparesis following stroke

AU - Kesar, Trisha M.

AU - Ding, Jun

AU - Wexler, Anthony S.

AU - Perumal, Ramu

AU - Maladen, Ryan

AU - Binder-Macleod, Stuart A.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Background. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) has been used to improve function in individuals with hemiparesis following stroke. An ideal functional electrical stimulation (FES) system needs an accurate mathematical model capable of designing subject and task-specific stimulation patterns. Such a model was previously developed in our laboratory and shown to predict the isometric forces produced by the quadriceps femoris muscles of able-bodied individuals and individuals with spinal cord injury in response to a wide range of clinically relevant stimulation frequencies and patterns. The aim of this study was to test our isometric muscle force model on the quadriceps femoris, ankle dorsiflexor, and ankle plantar-flexor muscles of individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis. Methods. Subjects were seated on a force dynamometer and isometric forces were measured in response to a range of stimulation frequencies (10 to 80-Hz) and 3 different patterns. Subject-specific model parameter values were obtained by fitting the measured force responses from 2 stimulation trains. The model parameters thus obtained were then used to obtain predicted forces for a range of frequencies and patterns. Predicted and measured forces were compared using intra-class correlation coefficients, r2 values, and model error relative to the physiological error (variability of measured forces). Results. Results showed excellent agreement between measured and predicted force-time responses (r2 >0.80), peak forces (ICCs>0.84), and force-time integrals (ICCs>0.82) for the quadriceps, dorsiflexor, and plantar-fexor muscles. The model error was within or below the +95% confidence interval of the physiological error for >88% comparisons between measured and predicted forces. Conclusion. Our results show that the model has potential to be incorporated as a feed-forward controller for predicting subject-specific stimulation patterns during FES.

AB - Background. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) has been used to improve function in individuals with hemiparesis following stroke. An ideal functional electrical stimulation (FES) system needs an accurate mathematical model capable of designing subject and task-specific stimulation patterns. Such a model was previously developed in our laboratory and shown to predict the isometric forces produced by the quadriceps femoris muscles of able-bodied individuals and individuals with spinal cord injury in response to a wide range of clinically relevant stimulation frequencies and patterns. The aim of this study was to test our isometric muscle force model on the quadriceps femoris, ankle dorsiflexor, and ankle plantar-flexor muscles of individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis. Methods. Subjects were seated on a force dynamometer and isometric forces were measured in response to a range of stimulation frequencies (10 to 80-Hz) and 3 different patterns. Subject-specific model parameter values were obtained by fitting the measured force responses from 2 stimulation trains. The model parameters thus obtained were then used to obtain predicted forces for a range of frequencies and patterns. Predicted and measured forces were compared using intra-class correlation coefficients, r2 values, and model error relative to the physiological error (variability of measured forces). Results. Results showed excellent agreement between measured and predicted force-time responses (r2 >0.80), peak forces (ICCs>0.84), and force-time integrals (ICCs>0.82) for the quadriceps, dorsiflexor, and plantar-fexor muscles. The model error was within or below the +95% confidence interval of the physiological error for >88% comparisons between measured and predicted forces. Conclusion. Our results show that the model has potential to be incorporated as a feed-forward controller for predicting subject-specific stimulation patterns during FES.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42149188452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42149188452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1743-0003-5-7

DO - 10.1186/1743-0003-5-7

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

SN - 1743-0003

M1 - 7

ER -