Predicting ligand binding to proteins by affinity fingerprinting

Lawrence M. Kauvar, Deborah L. Higgins, Hugo O. Villar, J. Richard Sportsman, Åsa Engqvist-Goldstein, Robert Bukar, Karin E. Bauer, Hara Dilley, David M Rocke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

180 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There are many ways to represent a molecule's properties, including atomic-connectivity drawings. NMR spectra, and molecular orbital models. Prior methods for predicting the biological activity of compounds have largely depended on these physical representations. Measuring a compound's binding potency against a small reference panel of diverse proteins defines a very different representation of the molecule, which we call an affinity fingerprint. Statistical analysis of such fingerprints provides new insights into aspects of binding interactions that are shared among a wide variety of proteins. These analyses facilitate prediction of the binding properties of these compounds assayed against new proteins. Results: Affinity fingerprints are reported for 122 structurally-diverse compounds using a reference panel of eight proteins that collectively are able to generate unique fingerprints for about 75% of the small organic compounds tested. Application of multivariate regression techniques to this database enables the creation of computational surrogates to represent new proteins that are surprisingly effective at predicting binding potencies. We illustrate this for two enzymes with no previously recognizable similarity to each other or to any of the reference proteins. Fitting of analogous computational surrogates to four other proteins confirms the generality of the method: when applied to a fingerprinted library of 5000 compounds, several sub-micromolar bits were correctly predicted. Conclusions: An affinity fingerprint database, which provides a rich source of data defining operational similarities among proteins, can be used to test theories of cryptic homology unexpected from current understanding of protein structure. Practical applications to drug design include efficient pre-screening of large numbers of compounds against target proteins using fingerprint similarities, supplemented by a small number of empirical measurements, to select promising compounds for further study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-118
Number of pages12
JournalChemistry and Biology
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Peptide Mapping
Carrier Proteins
Ligands
Dermatoglyphics
Proteins
Databases
Molecular Models
Information Storage and Retrieval
Drug Design
Molecules
Molecular orbitals
Bioactivity
Organic compounds
Statistical methods
Screening
Nuclear magnetic resonance

Keywords

  • chemical classification
  • ligand binding
  • linear regression
  • target surrogate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Molecular Medicine
  • Drug Discovery
  • Pharmacology
  • Organic Chemistry

Cite this

Kauvar, L. M., Higgins, D. L., Villar, H. O., Sportsman, J. R., Engqvist-Goldstein, Å., Bukar, R., ... Rocke, D. M. (1995). Predicting ligand binding to proteins by affinity fingerprinting. Chemistry and Biology, 2(2), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/1074-5521(95)90283-X

Predicting ligand binding to proteins by affinity fingerprinting. / Kauvar, Lawrence M.; Higgins, Deborah L.; Villar, Hugo O.; Sportsman, J. Richard; Engqvist-Goldstein, Åsa; Bukar, Robert; Bauer, Karin E.; Dilley, Hara; Rocke, David M.

In: Chemistry and Biology, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1995, p. 107-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kauvar, LM, Higgins, DL, Villar, HO, Sportsman, JR, Engqvist-Goldstein, Å, Bukar, R, Bauer, KE, Dilley, H & Rocke, DM 1995, 'Predicting ligand binding to proteins by affinity fingerprinting', Chemistry and Biology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/1074-5521(95)90283-X
Kauvar LM, Higgins DL, Villar HO, Sportsman JR, Engqvist-Goldstein Å, Bukar R et al. Predicting ligand binding to proteins by affinity fingerprinting. Chemistry and Biology. 1995;2(2):107-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/1074-5521(95)90283-X
Kauvar, Lawrence M. ; Higgins, Deborah L. ; Villar, Hugo O. ; Sportsman, J. Richard ; Engqvist-Goldstein, Åsa ; Bukar, Robert ; Bauer, Karin E. ; Dilley, Hara ; Rocke, David M. / Predicting ligand binding to proteins by affinity fingerprinting. In: Chemistry and Biology. 1995 ; Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 107-118.
@article{eeedca6f93cf4ffbaf28655534e7afc0,
title = "Predicting ligand binding to proteins by affinity fingerprinting",
abstract = "Background: There are many ways to represent a molecule's properties, including atomic-connectivity drawings. NMR spectra, and molecular orbital models. Prior methods for predicting the biological activity of compounds have largely depended on these physical representations. Measuring a compound's binding potency against a small reference panel of diverse proteins defines a very different representation of the molecule, which we call an affinity fingerprint. Statistical analysis of such fingerprints provides new insights into aspects of binding interactions that are shared among a wide variety of proteins. These analyses facilitate prediction of the binding properties of these compounds assayed against new proteins. Results: Affinity fingerprints are reported for 122 structurally-diverse compounds using a reference panel of eight proteins that collectively are able to generate unique fingerprints for about 75{\%} of the small organic compounds tested. Application of multivariate regression techniques to this database enables the creation of computational surrogates to represent new proteins that are surprisingly effective at predicting binding potencies. We illustrate this for two enzymes with no previously recognizable similarity to each other or to any of the reference proteins. Fitting of analogous computational surrogates to four other proteins confirms the generality of the method: when applied to a fingerprinted library of 5000 compounds, several sub-micromolar bits were correctly predicted. Conclusions: An affinity fingerprint database, which provides a rich source of data defining operational similarities among proteins, can be used to test theories of cryptic homology unexpected from current understanding of protein structure. Practical applications to drug design include efficient pre-screening of large numbers of compounds against target proteins using fingerprint similarities, supplemented by a small number of empirical measurements, to select promising compounds for further study.",
keywords = "chemical classification, ligand binding, linear regression, target surrogate",
author = "Kauvar, {Lawrence M.} and Higgins, {Deborah L.} and Villar, {Hugo O.} and Sportsman, {J. Richard} and {\AA}sa Engqvist-Goldstein and Robert Bukar and Bauer, {Karin E.} and Hara Dilley and Rocke, {David M}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/1074-5521(95)90283-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "107--118",
journal = "Cell Chemical Biology",
issn = "2451-9448",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting ligand binding to proteins by affinity fingerprinting

AU - Kauvar, Lawrence M.

AU - Higgins, Deborah L.

AU - Villar, Hugo O.

AU - Sportsman, J. Richard

AU - Engqvist-Goldstein, Åsa

AU - Bukar, Robert

AU - Bauer, Karin E.

AU - Dilley, Hara

AU - Rocke, David M

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Background: There are many ways to represent a molecule's properties, including atomic-connectivity drawings. NMR spectra, and molecular orbital models. Prior methods for predicting the biological activity of compounds have largely depended on these physical representations. Measuring a compound's binding potency against a small reference panel of diverse proteins defines a very different representation of the molecule, which we call an affinity fingerprint. Statistical analysis of such fingerprints provides new insights into aspects of binding interactions that are shared among a wide variety of proteins. These analyses facilitate prediction of the binding properties of these compounds assayed against new proteins. Results: Affinity fingerprints are reported for 122 structurally-diverse compounds using a reference panel of eight proteins that collectively are able to generate unique fingerprints for about 75% of the small organic compounds tested. Application of multivariate regression techniques to this database enables the creation of computational surrogates to represent new proteins that are surprisingly effective at predicting binding potencies. We illustrate this for two enzymes with no previously recognizable similarity to each other or to any of the reference proteins. Fitting of analogous computational surrogates to four other proteins confirms the generality of the method: when applied to a fingerprinted library of 5000 compounds, several sub-micromolar bits were correctly predicted. Conclusions: An affinity fingerprint database, which provides a rich source of data defining operational similarities among proteins, can be used to test theories of cryptic homology unexpected from current understanding of protein structure. Practical applications to drug design include efficient pre-screening of large numbers of compounds against target proteins using fingerprint similarities, supplemented by a small number of empirical measurements, to select promising compounds for further study.

AB - Background: There are many ways to represent a molecule's properties, including atomic-connectivity drawings. NMR spectra, and molecular orbital models. Prior methods for predicting the biological activity of compounds have largely depended on these physical representations. Measuring a compound's binding potency against a small reference panel of diverse proteins defines a very different representation of the molecule, which we call an affinity fingerprint. Statistical analysis of such fingerprints provides new insights into aspects of binding interactions that are shared among a wide variety of proteins. These analyses facilitate prediction of the binding properties of these compounds assayed against new proteins. Results: Affinity fingerprints are reported for 122 structurally-diverse compounds using a reference panel of eight proteins that collectively are able to generate unique fingerprints for about 75% of the small organic compounds tested. Application of multivariate regression techniques to this database enables the creation of computational surrogates to represent new proteins that are surprisingly effective at predicting binding potencies. We illustrate this for two enzymes with no previously recognizable similarity to each other or to any of the reference proteins. Fitting of analogous computational surrogates to four other proteins confirms the generality of the method: when applied to a fingerprinted library of 5000 compounds, several sub-micromolar bits were correctly predicted. Conclusions: An affinity fingerprint database, which provides a rich source of data defining operational similarities among proteins, can be used to test theories of cryptic homology unexpected from current understanding of protein structure. Practical applications to drug design include efficient pre-screening of large numbers of compounds against target proteins using fingerprint similarities, supplemented by a small number of empirical measurements, to select promising compounds for further study.

KW - chemical classification

KW - ligand binding

KW - linear regression

KW - target surrogate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029240364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029240364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/1074-5521(95)90283-X

DO - 10.1016/1074-5521(95)90283-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 9383411

AN - SCOPUS:0029240364

VL - 2

SP - 107

EP - 118

JO - Cell Chemical Biology

JF - Cell Chemical Biology

SN - 2451-9448

IS - 2

ER -