Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial

F. Eckstein, R. J. Buck, D. Burstein, H. C. Charles, J. Crim, M. Hudelmaier, D. J. Hunter, G. Hutchins, C. Jackson, V. Byers Kraus, Nancy E Lane, T. M. Link, L. S. Majumdar, S. Mazzuca, P. V. Prasad, T. J. Schnitzer, M. S. Taljanovic, A. Vaz, B. Wyman, M. P. Hellio Le Graverand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Quantitative MRI (qMRI) of cartilage morphology is a promising tool for disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) development. Recent studies at single sites have indicated that measurements at 3.0 Tesla (T) are more reproducible (precise) than those at 1.5 T. Precision errors and stability in multicentre studies with imaging equipment from various vendors have, however, not yet been evaluated. Methods: A total of 158 female participants (97 Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KLG) 0, 31 KLG 2 and 30 KLG 3) were imaged at 7 clinical centres using Siemens Magnetom Trio and GE Signa Excite magnets. Double oblique coronal acquisitions were obtained at baseline and at 3 months, using water excitation spoiled gradient echo sequences (1.0x0.31x0.31 mm3 resolution). Segmentation of femorotibial cartilage morphology was performed using proprietary software (Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany). Results: The precision error (root mean square coefficient of variation (RMS CV)%) for cartilage thickness/volume measurements ranged from 2.1%/2.4% (medial tibia) to 2.9%/3.3% (lateral weight-bearing femoral condyle) across all participants. No significant differences in precision errors were observed between KLGs, imaging sites, or scanner manufacturers/types. Mean differences between baseline and 3 months ranged from <0.1% (non-significant) in the medial to 0.94% (p<0.01) in the lateral femorotibial compartment, and were 0.33% (p<0.02) for the total femorotibial subchondral bone area. Conclusions: qMRI performed at 3.0 T provides highly reproducible measurements of cartilage morphology in multicentre clinical trials with equipment from different vendors. The technology thus appears sufficiently robust to be recommended for large-scale multicentre trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1683-1688
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Volume67
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Cartilage
Magnetic resonance
Multicenter Studies
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Clinical Trials
Imaging techniques
Magnetic resonance imaging
Bearings (structural)
Bone and Bones
Volume measurement
Equipment and Supplies
Thickness measurement
Magnets
Weight-Bearing
Thigh
Tibia
Osteoarthritis
Germany
Bone
Software

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Immunology
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Immunology and Allergy

Cite this

Eckstein, F., Buck, R. J., Burstein, D., Charles, H. C., Crim, J., Hudelmaier, M., ... Hellio Le Graverand, M. P. (2008). Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 67(12), 1683-1688. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.076919

Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial. / Eckstein, F.; Buck, R. J.; Burstein, D.; Charles, H. C.; Crim, J.; Hudelmaier, M.; Hunter, D. J.; Hutchins, G.; Jackson, C.; Byers Kraus, V.; Lane, Nancy E; Link, T. M.; Majumdar, L. S.; Mazzuca, S.; Prasad, P. V.; Schnitzer, T. J.; Taljanovic, M. S.; Vaz, A.; Wyman, B.; Hellio Le Graverand, M. P.

In: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Vol. 67, No. 12, 12.2008, p. 1683-1688.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eckstein, F, Buck, RJ, Burstein, D, Charles, HC, Crim, J, Hudelmaier, M, Hunter, DJ, Hutchins, G, Jackson, C, Byers Kraus, V, Lane, NE, Link, TM, Majumdar, LS, Mazzuca, S, Prasad, PV, Schnitzer, TJ, Taljanovic, MS, Vaz, A, Wyman, B & Hellio Le Graverand, MP 2008, 'Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial', Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 1683-1688. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.076919
Eckstein, F. ; Buck, R. J. ; Burstein, D. ; Charles, H. C. ; Crim, J. ; Hudelmaier, M. ; Hunter, D. J. ; Hutchins, G. ; Jackson, C. ; Byers Kraus, V. ; Lane, Nancy E ; Link, T. M. ; Majumdar, L. S. ; Mazzuca, S. ; Prasad, P. V. ; Schnitzer, T. J. ; Taljanovic, M. S. ; Vaz, A. ; Wyman, B. ; Hellio Le Graverand, M. P. / Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial. In: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2008 ; Vol. 67, No. 12. pp. 1683-1688.
@article{0e431e6ec6a5401abf03922815bf60a1,
title = "Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial",
abstract = "Objective: Quantitative MRI (qMRI) of cartilage morphology is a promising tool for disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) development. Recent studies at single sites have indicated that measurements at 3.0 Tesla (T) are more reproducible (precise) than those at 1.5 T. Precision errors and stability in multicentre studies with imaging equipment from various vendors have, however, not yet been evaluated. Methods: A total of 158 female participants (97 Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KLG) 0, 31 KLG 2 and 30 KLG 3) were imaged at 7 clinical centres using Siemens Magnetom Trio and GE Signa Excite magnets. Double oblique coronal acquisitions were obtained at baseline and at 3 months, using water excitation spoiled gradient echo sequences (1.0x0.31x0.31 mm3 resolution). Segmentation of femorotibial cartilage morphology was performed using proprietary software (Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany). Results: The precision error (root mean square coefficient of variation (RMS CV){\%}) for cartilage thickness/volume measurements ranged from 2.1{\%}/2.4{\%} (medial tibia) to 2.9{\%}/3.3{\%} (lateral weight-bearing femoral condyle) across all participants. No significant differences in precision errors were observed between KLGs, imaging sites, or scanner manufacturers/types. Mean differences between baseline and 3 months ranged from <0.1{\%} (non-significant) in the medial to 0.94{\%} (p<0.01) in the lateral femorotibial compartment, and were 0.33{\%} (p<0.02) for the total femorotibial subchondral bone area. Conclusions: qMRI performed at 3.0 T provides highly reproducible measurements of cartilage morphology in multicentre clinical trials with equipment from different vendors. The technology thus appears sufficiently robust to be recommended for large-scale multicentre trials.",
author = "F. Eckstein and Buck, {R. J.} and D. Burstein and Charles, {H. C.} and J. Crim and M. Hudelmaier and Hunter, {D. J.} and G. Hutchins and C. Jackson and {Byers Kraus}, V. and Lane, {Nancy E} and Link, {T. M.} and Majumdar, {L. S.} and S. Mazzuca and Prasad, {P. V.} and Schnitzer, {T. J.} and Taljanovic, {M. S.} and A. Vaz and B. Wyman and {Hellio Le Graverand}, {M. P.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1136/ard.2007.076919",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "1683--1688",
journal = "Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases",
issn = "0003-4967",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial

AU - Eckstein, F.

AU - Buck, R. J.

AU - Burstein, D.

AU - Charles, H. C.

AU - Crim, J.

AU - Hudelmaier, M.

AU - Hunter, D. J.

AU - Hutchins, G.

AU - Jackson, C.

AU - Byers Kraus, V.

AU - Lane, Nancy E

AU - Link, T. M.

AU - Majumdar, L. S.

AU - Mazzuca, S.

AU - Prasad, P. V.

AU - Schnitzer, T. J.

AU - Taljanovic, M. S.

AU - Vaz, A.

AU - Wyman, B.

AU - Hellio Le Graverand, M. P.

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Objective: Quantitative MRI (qMRI) of cartilage morphology is a promising tool for disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) development. Recent studies at single sites have indicated that measurements at 3.0 Tesla (T) are more reproducible (precise) than those at 1.5 T. Precision errors and stability in multicentre studies with imaging equipment from various vendors have, however, not yet been evaluated. Methods: A total of 158 female participants (97 Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KLG) 0, 31 KLG 2 and 30 KLG 3) were imaged at 7 clinical centres using Siemens Magnetom Trio and GE Signa Excite magnets. Double oblique coronal acquisitions were obtained at baseline and at 3 months, using water excitation spoiled gradient echo sequences (1.0x0.31x0.31 mm3 resolution). Segmentation of femorotibial cartilage morphology was performed using proprietary software (Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany). Results: The precision error (root mean square coefficient of variation (RMS CV)%) for cartilage thickness/volume measurements ranged from 2.1%/2.4% (medial tibia) to 2.9%/3.3% (lateral weight-bearing femoral condyle) across all participants. No significant differences in precision errors were observed between KLGs, imaging sites, or scanner manufacturers/types. Mean differences between baseline and 3 months ranged from <0.1% (non-significant) in the medial to 0.94% (p<0.01) in the lateral femorotibial compartment, and were 0.33% (p<0.02) for the total femorotibial subchondral bone area. Conclusions: qMRI performed at 3.0 T provides highly reproducible measurements of cartilage morphology in multicentre clinical trials with equipment from different vendors. The technology thus appears sufficiently robust to be recommended for large-scale multicentre trials.

AB - Objective: Quantitative MRI (qMRI) of cartilage morphology is a promising tool for disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) development. Recent studies at single sites have indicated that measurements at 3.0 Tesla (T) are more reproducible (precise) than those at 1.5 T. Precision errors and stability in multicentre studies with imaging equipment from various vendors have, however, not yet been evaluated. Methods: A total of 158 female participants (97 Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KLG) 0, 31 KLG 2 and 30 KLG 3) were imaged at 7 clinical centres using Siemens Magnetom Trio and GE Signa Excite magnets. Double oblique coronal acquisitions were obtained at baseline and at 3 months, using water excitation spoiled gradient echo sequences (1.0x0.31x0.31 mm3 resolution). Segmentation of femorotibial cartilage morphology was performed using proprietary software (Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany). Results: The precision error (root mean square coefficient of variation (RMS CV)%) for cartilage thickness/volume measurements ranged from 2.1%/2.4% (medial tibia) to 2.9%/3.3% (lateral weight-bearing femoral condyle) across all participants. No significant differences in precision errors were observed between KLGs, imaging sites, or scanner manufacturers/types. Mean differences between baseline and 3 months ranged from <0.1% (non-significant) in the medial to 0.94% (p<0.01) in the lateral femorotibial compartment, and were 0.33% (p<0.02) for the total femorotibial subchondral bone area. Conclusions: qMRI performed at 3.0 T provides highly reproducible measurements of cartilage morphology in multicentre clinical trials with equipment from different vendors. The technology thus appears sufficiently robust to be recommended for large-scale multicentre trials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48349128829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48349128829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/ard.2007.076919

DO - 10.1136/ard.2007.076919

M3 - Article

C2 - 18283054

AN - SCOPUS:48349128829

VL - 67

SP - 1683

EP - 1688

JO - Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

JF - Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

SN - 0003-4967

IS - 12

ER -