Pre-bisection of a single skin biopsy does not produce technically inadequate specimens for direct immunofluorescence

A review of 3450 specimens

Ern Loh, April W. Armstrong, Maxwell A Fung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Evaluation of a potential immunobullous disorder typically requires two pieces of tissue obtained by skin biopsy: one placed in formalin for conventional microscopy and a second placed in a different transport medium suitable for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) testing. Clinical practice in this area is not standardized, with dermatologists either obtaining two biopsies or dividing (pre-bisecting) a single biopsy. Some DIF specimens are technically inadequate for interpretation of subepidermal imunobullous disorders because the basement membrane zone is not intact, but it is unknown whether pre-bisecting the tissue increases the risk of compromising the specimen. Objective To investigate whether technically inadequate DIF specimens are associated with pre-bisection.

Methods DIF specimens were consecutively sampled from a single referral center and identified as whole (non-bisected) biopsy specimens or pre-bisected biopsy specimens. The proportion of inadequate specimens was calculated for both groups.

Results A total of 3450 specimens were included. The percentage of inadequate specimens was 5.072% (153/3016) for whole (non-bisected) specimens and 5.299% for pre-bisected specimens. This difference was not significant (chi square, p = 0.84). The study was sufficiently powered to detect a relative risk of 1.685.

Conclusions Pre-bisection of a single skin biopsy does not significantly increase the risk of a technically inadequate specimen for direct immunofluorescence testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)890-892
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Cutaneous Pathology
Volume41
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014

Fingerprint

Direct Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Biopsy
Skin
Basement Membrane
Formaldehyde
Microscopy
Referral and Consultation

Keywords

  • bullous pemphigoid
  • dermatologist
  • dermatopathology
  • immunopathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Histology

Cite this

Pre-bisection of a single skin biopsy does not produce technically inadequate specimens for direct immunofluorescence : A review of 3450 specimens. / Loh, Ern; Armstrong, April W.; Fung, Maxwell A.

In: Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, Vol. 41, No. 11, 01.11.2014, p. 890-892.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8e7ccb9cb6d14fae849a1ec3414170a5,
title = "Pre-bisection of a single skin biopsy does not produce technically inadequate specimens for direct immunofluorescence: A review of 3450 specimens",
abstract = "Background Evaluation of a potential immunobullous disorder typically requires two pieces of tissue obtained by skin biopsy: one placed in formalin for conventional microscopy and a second placed in a different transport medium suitable for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) testing. Clinical practice in this area is not standardized, with dermatologists either obtaining two biopsies or dividing (pre-bisecting) a single biopsy. Some DIF specimens are technically inadequate for interpretation of subepidermal imunobullous disorders because the basement membrane zone is not intact, but it is unknown whether pre-bisecting the tissue increases the risk of compromising the specimen. Objective To investigate whether technically inadequate DIF specimens are associated with pre-bisection.Methods DIF specimens were consecutively sampled from a single referral center and identified as whole (non-bisected) biopsy specimens or pre-bisected biopsy specimens. The proportion of inadequate specimens was calculated for both groups.Results A total of 3450 specimens were included. The percentage of inadequate specimens was 5.072{\%} (153/3016) for whole (non-bisected) specimens and 5.299{\%} for pre-bisected specimens. This difference was not significant (chi square, p = 0.84). The study was sufficiently powered to detect a relative risk of 1.685.Conclusions Pre-bisection of a single skin biopsy does not significantly increase the risk of a technically inadequate specimen for direct immunofluorescence testing.",
keywords = "bullous pemphigoid, dermatologist, dermatopathology, immunopathology",
author = "Ern Loh and Armstrong, {April W.} and Fung, {Maxwell A}",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cup.12393",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "890--892",
journal = "Journal of Cutaneous Pathology",
issn = "0303-6987",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pre-bisection of a single skin biopsy does not produce technically inadequate specimens for direct immunofluorescence

T2 - A review of 3450 specimens

AU - Loh, Ern

AU - Armstrong, April W.

AU - Fung, Maxwell A

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - Background Evaluation of a potential immunobullous disorder typically requires two pieces of tissue obtained by skin biopsy: one placed in formalin for conventional microscopy and a second placed in a different transport medium suitable for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) testing. Clinical practice in this area is not standardized, with dermatologists either obtaining two biopsies or dividing (pre-bisecting) a single biopsy. Some DIF specimens are technically inadequate for interpretation of subepidermal imunobullous disorders because the basement membrane zone is not intact, but it is unknown whether pre-bisecting the tissue increases the risk of compromising the specimen. Objective To investigate whether technically inadequate DIF specimens are associated with pre-bisection.Methods DIF specimens were consecutively sampled from a single referral center and identified as whole (non-bisected) biopsy specimens or pre-bisected biopsy specimens. The proportion of inadequate specimens was calculated for both groups.Results A total of 3450 specimens were included. The percentage of inadequate specimens was 5.072% (153/3016) for whole (non-bisected) specimens and 5.299% for pre-bisected specimens. This difference was not significant (chi square, p = 0.84). The study was sufficiently powered to detect a relative risk of 1.685.Conclusions Pre-bisection of a single skin biopsy does not significantly increase the risk of a technically inadequate specimen for direct immunofluorescence testing.

AB - Background Evaluation of a potential immunobullous disorder typically requires two pieces of tissue obtained by skin biopsy: one placed in formalin for conventional microscopy and a second placed in a different transport medium suitable for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) testing. Clinical practice in this area is not standardized, with dermatologists either obtaining two biopsies or dividing (pre-bisecting) a single biopsy. Some DIF specimens are technically inadequate for interpretation of subepidermal imunobullous disorders because the basement membrane zone is not intact, but it is unknown whether pre-bisecting the tissue increases the risk of compromising the specimen. Objective To investigate whether technically inadequate DIF specimens are associated with pre-bisection.Methods DIF specimens were consecutively sampled from a single referral center and identified as whole (non-bisected) biopsy specimens or pre-bisected biopsy specimens. The proportion of inadequate specimens was calculated for both groups.Results A total of 3450 specimens were included. The percentage of inadequate specimens was 5.072% (153/3016) for whole (non-bisected) specimens and 5.299% for pre-bisected specimens. This difference was not significant (chi square, p = 0.84). The study was sufficiently powered to detect a relative risk of 1.685.Conclusions Pre-bisection of a single skin biopsy does not significantly increase the risk of a technically inadequate specimen for direct immunofluorescence testing.

KW - bullous pemphigoid

KW - dermatologist

KW - dermatopathology

KW - immunopathology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84913532883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84913532883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cup.12393

DO - 10.1111/cup.12393

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 890

EP - 892

JO - Journal of Cutaneous Pathology

JF - Journal of Cutaneous Pathology

SN - 0303-6987

IS - 11

ER -