Postoperative direct healthcare costs of lumbar discectomy are reduced with the use of a novel annular closure device in high-risk patients

Jared D. Ament, Bart Thaci, Zhuo Yang, Adisa Kursumovic, Richard Bostelmann, Todd Lanman, Johnson J. Patrick, Susanne Fröhlich, Kee D Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar discectomy is largely successful surgical procedure; however, reherniation rates in patients with large annular defects are as high as 27%. The expense associated with a revision surgery places significant burden on the healthcare system. PURPOSE: To compare the direct healthcare costs through 5 years follow-up of conventional discectomy (Control) with those of discectomy supplemented by an adjunctive annular closure device (ACD) in high-risk patients with large annular defects. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cost-effectiveness study. METHODS: All-cause index level reoperations were reviewed from a multicenter, randomized controlled superiority trial that allocated 554 high-risk discectomy patients with large annular defects to either control or ACD. Medicare and private insurer (Humana) direct costs were derived from a commercially available payer database to estimate costs in the US healthcare system, including those associated with facility, surgeon, imaging, follow-up visits, physical therapy, and injections. A 50:50 split between Medicare and Commercial insurers was assumed for the base case analysis. The analysis was also performed on a 80:20 Commercial:Medicare payer basis. For the base case scenario, a 2-year time horizon and outpatient cost setting was established for the index procedure. Repeat discectomy was assumed to be performed on a 60:40 outpatient-to-inpatient basis. Complications requiring surgery, revisions, and/or fusion were assumed to be managed in the inpatient setting. Total costs of reoperation and per-patient costs of reoperation were compared between groups for both forms of insurers. One author received consulting fees of <$50,000 for the completion of this study, and the other eight authors did not have any financial associations with the current work. Funding for this study was provided by Intrinsic Therapeutics, but all analyses, interpretation, and writing were performed independently by the authors. RESULTS: At two years follow-up, use of the ACD reduced the rate of symptomatic reherniations in a large defect population to 13% compared with 25% in the control group (p<.001). This reduction in symptomatic reherniations in the ACD group translated to a savings of $2,802 per patient in direct healthcare costs compared with Control at 2 years and $5,315 per patient by 5 years based on 50% private and 50% public (Medicare) payer split. Under the scenario of 80:20 private:public insurance reimbursement, the estimated direct cost savings were $3,215 and $6,099 per patient at 2- and 5-years postoperatively, respectively, with the use of the ACD. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic reherniation and reoperation rates were nearly double among control patients compared with ACD-treated patients, which translated to markedly greater per-patient healthcare costs in the control group, where the ACD was not used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSpine Journal
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Diskectomy
Health Care Costs
Equipment and Supplies
Reoperation
Medicare
Insurance Carriers
Costs and Cost Analysis
Inpatients
Outpatients
Delivery of Health Care
Control Groups
Fees and Charges
Cost Control
Cost Savings
Insurance
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Databases

Keywords

  • Annular closure device
  • Cost
  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Direct costs
  • Lumbar disc herniation
  • Reherniation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Postoperative direct healthcare costs of lumbar discectomy are reduced with the use of a novel annular closure device in high-risk patients. / Ament, Jared D.; Thaci, Bart; Yang, Zhuo; Kursumovic, Adisa; Bostelmann, Richard; Lanman, Todd; Patrick, Johnson J.; Fröhlich, Susanne; Kim, Kee D.

In: Spine Journal, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ament, Jared D. ; Thaci, Bart ; Yang, Zhuo ; Kursumovic, Adisa ; Bostelmann, Richard ; Lanman, Todd ; Patrick, Johnson J. ; Fröhlich, Susanne ; Kim, Kee D. / Postoperative direct healthcare costs of lumbar discectomy are reduced with the use of a novel annular closure device in high-risk patients. In: Spine Journal. 2019.
@article{9eec3886cac844b18534bcbac9de2f37,
title = "Postoperative direct healthcare costs of lumbar discectomy are reduced with the use of a novel annular closure device in high-risk patients",
abstract = "BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar discectomy is largely successful surgical procedure; however, reherniation rates in patients with large annular defects are as high as 27{\%}. The expense associated with a revision surgery places significant burden on the healthcare system. PURPOSE: To compare the direct healthcare costs through 5 years follow-up of conventional discectomy (Control) with those of discectomy supplemented by an adjunctive annular closure device (ACD) in high-risk patients with large annular defects. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cost-effectiveness study. METHODS: All-cause index level reoperations were reviewed from a multicenter, randomized controlled superiority trial that allocated 554 high-risk discectomy patients with large annular defects to either control or ACD. Medicare and private insurer (Humana) direct costs were derived from a commercially available payer database to estimate costs in the US healthcare system, including those associated with facility, surgeon, imaging, follow-up visits, physical therapy, and injections. A 50:50 split between Medicare and Commercial insurers was assumed for the base case analysis. The analysis was also performed on a 80:20 Commercial:Medicare payer basis. For the base case scenario, a 2-year time horizon and outpatient cost setting was established for the index procedure. Repeat discectomy was assumed to be performed on a 60:40 outpatient-to-inpatient basis. Complications requiring surgery, revisions, and/or fusion were assumed to be managed in the inpatient setting. Total costs of reoperation and per-patient costs of reoperation were compared between groups for both forms of insurers. One author received consulting fees of <$50,000 for the completion of this study, and the other eight authors did not have any financial associations with the current work. Funding for this study was provided by Intrinsic Therapeutics, but all analyses, interpretation, and writing were performed independently by the authors. RESULTS: At two years follow-up, use of the ACD reduced the rate of symptomatic reherniations in a large defect population to 13{\%} compared with 25{\%} in the control group (p<.001). This reduction in symptomatic reherniations in the ACD group translated to a savings of $2,802 per patient in direct healthcare costs compared with Control at 2 years and $5,315 per patient by 5 years based on 50{\%} private and 50{\%} public (Medicare) payer split. Under the scenario of 80:20 private:public insurance reimbursement, the estimated direct cost savings were $3,215 and $6,099 per patient at 2- and 5-years postoperatively, respectively, with the use of the ACD. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic reherniation and reoperation rates were nearly double among control patients compared with ACD-treated patients, which translated to markedly greater per-patient healthcare costs in the control group, where the ACD was not used.",
keywords = "Annular closure device, Cost, Cost-benefit analysis, Direct costs, Lumbar disc herniation, Reherniation",
author = "Ament, {Jared D.} and Bart Thaci and Zhuo Yang and Adisa Kursumovic and Richard Bostelmann and Todd Lanman and Patrick, {Johnson J.} and Susanne Fr{\"o}hlich and Kim, {Kee D}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.010",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Spine Journal",
issn = "1529-9430",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postoperative direct healthcare costs of lumbar discectomy are reduced with the use of a novel annular closure device in high-risk patients

AU - Ament, Jared D.

AU - Thaci, Bart

AU - Yang, Zhuo

AU - Kursumovic, Adisa

AU - Bostelmann, Richard

AU - Lanman, Todd

AU - Patrick, Johnson J.

AU - Fröhlich, Susanne

AU - Kim, Kee D

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar discectomy is largely successful surgical procedure; however, reherniation rates in patients with large annular defects are as high as 27%. The expense associated with a revision surgery places significant burden on the healthcare system. PURPOSE: To compare the direct healthcare costs through 5 years follow-up of conventional discectomy (Control) with those of discectomy supplemented by an adjunctive annular closure device (ACD) in high-risk patients with large annular defects. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cost-effectiveness study. METHODS: All-cause index level reoperations were reviewed from a multicenter, randomized controlled superiority trial that allocated 554 high-risk discectomy patients with large annular defects to either control or ACD. Medicare and private insurer (Humana) direct costs were derived from a commercially available payer database to estimate costs in the US healthcare system, including those associated with facility, surgeon, imaging, follow-up visits, physical therapy, and injections. A 50:50 split between Medicare and Commercial insurers was assumed for the base case analysis. The analysis was also performed on a 80:20 Commercial:Medicare payer basis. For the base case scenario, a 2-year time horizon and outpatient cost setting was established for the index procedure. Repeat discectomy was assumed to be performed on a 60:40 outpatient-to-inpatient basis. Complications requiring surgery, revisions, and/or fusion were assumed to be managed in the inpatient setting. Total costs of reoperation and per-patient costs of reoperation were compared between groups for both forms of insurers. One author received consulting fees of <$50,000 for the completion of this study, and the other eight authors did not have any financial associations with the current work. Funding for this study was provided by Intrinsic Therapeutics, but all analyses, interpretation, and writing were performed independently by the authors. RESULTS: At two years follow-up, use of the ACD reduced the rate of symptomatic reherniations in a large defect population to 13% compared with 25% in the control group (p<.001). This reduction in symptomatic reherniations in the ACD group translated to a savings of $2,802 per patient in direct healthcare costs compared with Control at 2 years and $5,315 per patient by 5 years based on 50% private and 50% public (Medicare) payer split. Under the scenario of 80:20 private:public insurance reimbursement, the estimated direct cost savings were $3,215 and $6,099 per patient at 2- and 5-years postoperatively, respectively, with the use of the ACD. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic reherniation and reoperation rates were nearly double among control patients compared with ACD-treated patients, which translated to markedly greater per-patient healthcare costs in the control group, where the ACD was not used.

AB - BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar discectomy is largely successful surgical procedure; however, reherniation rates in patients with large annular defects are as high as 27%. The expense associated with a revision surgery places significant burden on the healthcare system. PURPOSE: To compare the direct healthcare costs through 5 years follow-up of conventional discectomy (Control) with those of discectomy supplemented by an adjunctive annular closure device (ACD) in high-risk patients with large annular defects. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cost-effectiveness study. METHODS: All-cause index level reoperations were reviewed from a multicenter, randomized controlled superiority trial that allocated 554 high-risk discectomy patients with large annular defects to either control or ACD. Medicare and private insurer (Humana) direct costs were derived from a commercially available payer database to estimate costs in the US healthcare system, including those associated with facility, surgeon, imaging, follow-up visits, physical therapy, and injections. A 50:50 split between Medicare and Commercial insurers was assumed for the base case analysis. The analysis was also performed on a 80:20 Commercial:Medicare payer basis. For the base case scenario, a 2-year time horizon and outpatient cost setting was established for the index procedure. Repeat discectomy was assumed to be performed on a 60:40 outpatient-to-inpatient basis. Complications requiring surgery, revisions, and/or fusion were assumed to be managed in the inpatient setting. Total costs of reoperation and per-patient costs of reoperation were compared between groups for both forms of insurers. One author received consulting fees of <$50,000 for the completion of this study, and the other eight authors did not have any financial associations with the current work. Funding for this study was provided by Intrinsic Therapeutics, but all analyses, interpretation, and writing were performed independently by the authors. RESULTS: At two years follow-up, use of the ACD reduced the rate of symptomatic reherniations in a large defect population to 13% compared with 25% in the control group (p<.001). This reduction in symptomatic reherniations in the ACD group translated to a savings of $2,802 per patient in direct healthcare costs compared with Control at 2 years and $5,315 per patient by 5 years based on 50% private and 50% public (Medicare) payer split. Under the scenario of 80:20 private:public insurance reimbursement, the estimated direct cost savings were $3,215 and $6,099 per patient at 2- and 5-years postoperatively, respectively, with the use of the ACD. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic reherniation and reoperation rates were nearly double among control patients compared with ACD-treated patients, which translated to markedly greater per-patient healthcare costs in the control group, where the ACD was not used.

KW - Annular closure device

KW - Cost

KW - Cost-benefit analysis

KW - Direct costs

KW - Lumbar disc herniation

KW - Reherniation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061993574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061993574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.010

M3 - Article

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

SN - 1529-9430

ER -