Postictal language dysfunction in patients with right or bilateral hemispheric language localization

Michael Privitera, Christian Kohler, William T Cahill, Hwa Shain Yeh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: As shown previously, when temporal lobe complex partial seizures (TLCPS) originate from the language dominant hemisphere, patients cannot read a test phrase correctly within 60 s of the end of the total discharge. We wished to assess whether postictal language testing results discordant with this pattern identified patients with non-left (right hemisphere or mixed) language dominance. Methods: Since 1988, all patients undergoing video/EEG monitoring at our institution have been given a test phrase to read aloud as soon as a seizure is detected. Inclusion criteria for this study were (a) postictal language testing within 60 s of seizure end for at least one TLCPS, (b) >90% seizure reduction after anterior temporal lobectomy with 2-year minimum follow-up, and (c) language localization by either intracarotid amobarbital test (IAT) or direct electrical stimulation of left hemisphere cortex. Results: Two hundred twenty-four seizures in 64 patients were analyzed. Discordant postictal language patterns were noted in 10 of 11 patients with IAT documented non-left language dominance and in 15 of 53 with left dominance (p = 0.006; sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 71.7%). Conclusions: Postictal language testing accurately identifies patients with non-left language dominance and may be useful in selecting appropriate patients for IAT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)936-941
Number of pages6
JournalEpilepsia
Volume37
Issue number10
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Rights
Language
Seizures
Amobarbital
Temporal Lobe
Anterior Temporal Lobectomy
Electric Stimulation
Electroencephalography
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Epilepsy
  • Intracarotid amobarbital test
  • Language
  • Seizure
  • Speech

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Postictal language dysfunction in patients with right or bilateral hemispheric language localization. / Privitera, Michael; Kohler, Christian; Cahill, William T; Yeh, Hwa Shain.

In: Epilepsia, Vol. 37, No. 10, 1996, p. 936-941.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Privitera, Michael ; Kohler, Christian ; Cahill, William T ; Yeh, Hwa Shain. / Postictal language dysfunction in patients with right or bilateral hemispheric language localization. In: Epilepsia. 1996 ; Vol. 37, No. 10. pp. 936-941.
@article{e273f0410a814dafbd7121de5da760e1,
title = "Postictal language dysfunction in patients with right or bilateral hemispheric language localization",
abstract = "Purpose: As shown previously, when temporal lobe complex partial seizures (TLCPS) originate from the language dominant hemisphere, patients cannot read a test phrase correctly within 60 s of the end of the total discharge. We wished to assess whether postictal language testing results discordant with this pattern identified patients with non-left (right hemisphere or mixed) language dominance. Methods: Since 1988, all patients undergoing video/EEG monitoring at our institution have been given a test phrase to read aloud as soon as a seizure is detected. Inclusion criteria for this study were (a) postictal language testing within 60 s of seizure end for at least one TLCPS, (b) >90{\%} seizure reduction after anterior temporal lobectomy with 2-year minimum follow-up, and (c) language localization by either intracarotid amobarbital test (IAT) or direct electrical stimulation of left hemisphere cortex. Results: Two hundred twenty-four seizures in 64 patients were analyzed. Discordant postictal language patterns were noted in 10 of 11 patients with IAT documented non-left language dominance and in 15 of 53 with left dominance (p = 0.006; sensitivity 90.9{\%}, specificity 71.7{\%}). Conclusions: Postictal language testing accurately identifies patients with non-left language dominance and may be useful in selecting appropriate patients for IAT.",
keywords = "Epilepsy, Intracarotid amobarbital test, Language, Seizure, Speech",
author = "Michael Privitera and Christian Kohler and Cahill, {William T} and Yeh, {Hwa Shain}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "936--941",
journal = "Epilepsia",
issn = "0013-9580",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postictal language dysfunction in patients with right or bilateral hemispheric language localization

AU - Privitera, Michael

AU - Kohler, Christian

AU - Cahill, William T

AU - Yeh, Hwa Shain

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Purpose: As shown previously, when temporal lobe complex partial seizures (TLCPS) originate from the language dominant hemisphere, patients cannot read a test phrase correctly within 60 s of the end of the total discharge. We wished to assess whether postictal language testing results discordant with this pattern identified patients with non-left (right hemisphere or mixed) language dominance. Methods: Since 1988, all patients undergoing video/EEG monitoring at our institution have been given a test phrase to read aloud as soon as a seizure is detected. Inclusion criteria for this study were (a) postictal language testing within 60 s of seizure end for at least one TLCPS, (b) >90% seizure reduction after anterior temporal lobectomy with 2-year minimum follow-up, and (c) language localization by either intracarotid amobarbital test (IAT) or direct electrical stimulation of left hemisphere cortex. Results: Two hundred twenty-four seizures in 64 patients were analyzed. Discordant postictal language patterns were noted in 10 of 11 patients with IAT documented non-left language dominance and in 15 of 53 with left dominance (p = 0.006; sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 71.7%). Conclusions: Postictal language testing accurately identifies patients with non-left language dominance and may be useful in selecting appropriate patients for IAT.

AB - Purpose: As shown previously, when temporal lobe complex partial seizures (TLCPS) originate from the language dominant hemisphere, patients cannot read a test phrase correctly within 60 s of the end of the total discharge. We wished to assess whether postictal language testing results discordant with this pattern identified patients with non-left (right hemisphere or mixed) language dominance. Methods: Since 1988, all patients undergoing video/EEG monitoring at our institution have been given a test phrase to read aloud as soon as a seizure is detected. Inclusion criteria for this study were (a) postictal language testing within 60 s of seizure end for at least one TLCPS, (b) >90% seizure reduction after anterior temporal lobectomy with 2-year minimum follow-up, and (c) language localization by either intracarotid amobarbital test (IAT) or direct electrical stimulation of left hemisphere cortex. Results: Two hundred twenty-four seizures in 64 patients were analyzed. Discordant postictal language patterns were noted in 10 of 11 patients with IAT documented non-left language dominance and in 15 of 53 with left dominance (p = 0.006; sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 71.7%). Conclusions: Postictal language testing accurately identifies patients with non-left language dominance and may be useful in selecting appropriate patients for IAT.

KW - Epilepsy

KW - Intracarotid amobarbital test

KW - Language

KW - Seizure

KW - Speech

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029840727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029840727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8822691

AN - SCOPUS:0029840727

VL - 37

SP - 936

EP - 941

JO - Epilepsia

JF - Epilepsia

SN - 0013-9580

IS - 10

ER -