Posterior Urethral Suspension during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Improves Early Urinary Control: A Prospective Cohort Study

Noah Canvasser, Aaron H. Lay, Ersin Koseoglu, Monica S.C. Morgan, Jeffrey A. Cadeddu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Early urinary control is a major goal for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We report our technique of posterior urethral suspension (PUS) performed at the time of urethrovesical anastomosis. Patients and Methods: We prospectively followed men with localized prostate cancer undergoing RARP by a single surgeon from August 2012 to October 2015. Patients before April 2014 underwent only bladder neck preservation (controls), while patients after April 2014 also underwent PUS. Patients were given a modified Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire, along with questions depicting objective measures of urinary control (type of pad, number of pads, wetness of pad). Time points queried were preoperatively and postoperatively at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12. Our primary outcome was pad-free survival. Results: Questionnaire response rate was 52% (56/107) for controls and 43% (36/83) for PUS. There were no differences in baseline demographics, preoperative urinary control, intraoperative variables, or postoperative complications between groups. There were few subjective improvements in urinary control for PUS compared with controls. More notable, PUS patients had significantly improved objective measures of urinary control, including less protective incontinence products at 1 and 2 weeks after catheter removal (p < 0.03). They also wore fewer pads and had less leakage on each pad that lasted from week 1 to week 4 after catheter removal (p < 0.01). PUS patients had pad-free rates of 37%, 47%, 54%, and 60% compared with controls 15%, 18%, 24%, and 36%, at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12 after catheter removal (p = 0.07). Conclusion: PUS may improve objective measures of early urinary control compared with controls. With no increase in operative time and no change in complication rates, further work in a randomized setting would provide additional weight to our findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1089-1094
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume30
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Suspensions
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies
Catheters
Prostatic Neoplasms
Intraoperative Complications
Operative Time
Urinary Bladder
Demography
Weights and Measures
Survival

Keywords

  • incontinence
  • prostate cancer
  • prostatectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Posterior Urethral Suspension during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Improves Early Urinary Control : A Prospective Cohort Study. / Canvasser, Noah; Lay, Aaron H.; Koseoglu, Ersin; Morgan, Monica S.C.; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 30, No. 10, 01.10.2016, p. 1089-1094.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Canvasser, Noah ; Lay, Aaron H. ; Koseoglu, Ersin ; Morgan, Monica S.C. ; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. / Posterior Urethral Suspension during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Improves Early Urinary Control : A Prospective Cohort Study. In: Journal of Endourology. 2016 ; Vol. 30, No. 10. pp. 1089-1094.
@article{71f05e5a30264d37a2dc9c897c9bb981,
title = "Posterior Urethral Suspension during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Improves Early Urinary Control: A Prospective Cohort Study",
abstract = "Purpose: Early urinary control is a major goal for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We report our technique of posterior urethral suspension (PUS) performed at the time of urethrovesical anastomosis. Patients and Methods: We prospectively followed men with localized prostate cancer undergoing RARP by a single surgeon from August 2012 to October 2015. Patients before April 2014 underwent only bladder neck preservation (controls), while patients after April 2014 also underwent PUS. Patients were given a modified Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire, along with questions depicting objective measures of urinary control (type of pad, number of pads, wetness of pad). Time points queried were preoperatively and postoperatively at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12. Our primary outcome was pad-free survival. Results: Questionnaire response rate was 52{\%} (56/107) for controls and 43{\%} (36/83) for PUS. There were no differences in baseline demographics, preoperative urinary control, intraoperative variables, or postoperative complications between groups. There were few subjective improvements in urinary control for PUS compared with controls. More notable, PUS patients had significantly improved objective measures of urinary control, including less protective incontinence products at 1 and 2 weeks after catheter removal (p < 0.03). They also wore fewer pads and had less leakage on each pad that lasted from week 1 to week 4 after catheter removal (p < 0.01). PUS patients had pad-free rates of 37{\%}, 47{\%}, 54{\%}, and 60{\%} compared with controls 15{\%}, 18{\%}, 24{\%}, and 36{\%}, at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12 after catheter removal (p = 0.07). Conclusion: PUS may improve objective measures of early urinary control compared with controls. With no increase in operative time and no change in complication rates, further work in a randomized setting would provide additional weight to our findings.",
keywords = "incontinence, prostate cancer, prostatectomy",
author = "Noah Canvasser and Lay, {Aaron H.} and Ersin Koseoglu and Morgan, {Monica S.C.} and Cadeddu, {Jeffrey A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/end.2016.0220",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "1089--1094",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Posterior Urethral Suspension during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Improves Early Urinary Control

T2 - A Prospective Cohort Study

AU - Canvasser, Noah

AU - Lay, Aaron H.

AU - Koseoglu, Ersin

AU - Morgan, Monica S.C.

AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Purpose: Early urinary control is a major goal for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We report our technique of posterior urethral suspension (PUS) performed at the time of urethrovesical anastomosis. Patients and Methods: We prospectively followed men with localized prostate cancer undergoing RARP by a single surgeon from August 2012 to October 2015. Patients before April 2014 underwent only bladder neck preservation (controls), while patients after April 2014 also underwent PUS. Patients were given a modified Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire, along with questions depicting objective measures of urinary control (type of pad, number of pads, wetness of pad). Time points queried were preoperatively and postoperatively at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12. Our primary outcome was pad-free survival. Results: Questionnaire response rate was 52% (56/107) for controls and 43% (36/83) for PUS. There were no differences in baseline demographics, preoperative urinary control, intraoperative variables, or postoperative complications between groups. There were few subjective improvements in urinary control for PUS compared with controls. More notable, PUS patients had significantly improved objective measures of urinary control, including less protective incontinence products at 1 and 2 weeks after catheter removal (p < 0.03). They also wore fewer pads and had less leakage on each pad that lasted from week 1 to week 4 after catheter removal (p < 0.01). PUS patients had pad-free rates of 37%, 47%, 54%, and 60% compared with controls 15%, 18%, 24%, and 36%, at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12 after catheter removal (p = 0.07). Conclusion: PUS may improve objective measures of early urinary control compared with controls. With no increase in operative time and no change in complication rates, further work in a randomized setting would provide additional weight to our findings.

AB - Purpose: Early urinary control is a major goal for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We report our technique of posterior urethral suspension (PUS) performed at the time of urethrovesical anastomosis. Patients and Methods: We prospectively followed men with localized prostate cancer undergoing RARP by a single surgeon from August 2012 to October 2015. Patients before April 2014 underwent only bladder neck preservation (controls), while patients after April 2014 also underwent PUS. Patients were given a modified Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire, along with questions depicting objective measures of urinary control (type of pad, number of pads, wetness of pad). Time points queried were preoperatively and postoperatively at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12. Our primary outcome was pad-free survival. Results: Questionnaire response rate was 52% (56/107) for controls and 43% (36/83) for PUS. There were no differences in baseline demographics, preoperative urinary control, intraoperative variables, or postoperative complications between groups. There were few subjective improvements in urinary control for PUS compared with controls. More notable, PUS patients had significantly improved objective measures of urinary control, including less protective incontinence products at 1 and 2 weeks after catheter removal (p < 0.03). They also wore fewer pads and had less leakage on each pad that lasted from week 1 to week 4 after catheter removal (p < 0.01). PUS patients had pad-free rates of 37%, 47%, 54%, and 60% compared with controls 15%, 18%, 24%, and 36%, at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12 after catheter removal (p = 0.07). Conclusion: PUS may improve objective measures of early urinary control compared with controls. With no increase in operative time and no change in complication rates, further work in a randomized setting would provide additional weight to our findings.

KW - incontinence

KW - prostate cancer

KW - prostatectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990829736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990829736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2016.0220

DO - 10.1089/end.2016.0220

M3 - Article

C2 - 27503582

AN - SCOPUS:84990829736

VL - 30

SP - 1089

EP - 1094

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 10

ER -