Positive and negative affect and risk of coronary heart disease: Whitehall II prospective cohort study

Hermann Nabi, Mika Kivimaki, Roberto De Vogli, Michael G. Marmot, Archana Singh-Manoux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the associations between positive and negative affect and subsequent coronary heart disease events independently of established risk factors. Design: Prospective cohort study with follow-up over 12 years. Setting: 20 civil service departments originally located in London. Participants: 10 308 civil servants aged 35-55 years at entry into Whitehall II study in 1985. Main outcome measures: Fatal coronary heart disease, clinically verified incident non-fatal myocardial infarction, and definite angina (n=619, mean follow-up 12.5 years). Results: In Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position, positive affect (hazard ratio=1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.24) and the balance between positive and negative affect, referred to as the affect balance score (hazard ratio=0.89, 0.73 to 1.09), were not associated with coronary heart disease. Further adjustment for behaviour related risk factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, daily fruit and vegetable intake, exercise, body mass index), biological risk factors (hypertension, blood cholesterol, diabetes), and psychological stress at work did not change these results. However, participants in the highest third of negative affect had an increased incidence of coronary events (hazard ratio=1.32, 1.09 to 1.60), and this association remained unchanged after adjustment for multiple confounders. Conclusions: Positive affect and affect balance did not seem to be predictive of future coronary heart disease in men and women who were free of diagnosed coronary heart disease at recruitment to the study. A weak positive association between negative affect and coronary heart disease was found and needs to be confirmed in further studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)32-36
Number of pages5
JournalBMJ
Volume337
Issue number7660
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 5 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Coronary Disease
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies
Biological Factors
Psychological Stress
Alcohol Drinking
Vegetables
Fruit
Body Mass Index
Smoking
Myocardial Infarction
Cholesterol
Regression Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Confidence Intervals
Exercise
Hypertension
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Nabi, H., Kivimaki, M., De Vogli, R., Marmot, M. G., & Singh-Manoux, A. (2008). Positive and negative affect and risk of coronary heart disease: Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ, 337(7660), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a118

Positive and negative affect and risk of coronary heart disease : Whitehall II prospective cohort study. / Nabi, Hermann; Kivimaki, Mika; De Vogli, Roberto; Marmot, Michael G.; Singh-Manoux, Archana.

In: BMJ, Vol. 337, No. 7660, 05.07.2008, p. 32-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nabi, H, Kivimaki, M, De Vogli, R, Marmot, MG & Singh-Manoux, A 2008, 'Positive and negative affect and risk of coronary heart disease: Whitehall II prospective cohort study', BMJ, vol. 337, no. 7660, pp. 32-36. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a118
Nabi, Hermann ; Kivimaki, Mika ; De Vogli, Roberto ; Marmot, Michael G. ; Singh-Manoux, Archana. / Positive and negative affect and risk of coronary heart disease : Whitehall II prospective cohort study. In: BMJ. 2008 ; Vol. 337, No. 7660. pp. 32-36.
@article{6067b2c7233f4f8db04ad932d9673227,
title = "Positive and negative affect and risk of coronary heart disease: Whitehall II prospective cohort study",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the associations between positive and negative affect and subsequent coronary heart disease events independently of established risk factors. Design: Prospective cohort study with follow-up over 12 years. Setting: 20 civil service departments originally located in London. Participants: 10 308 civil servants aged 35-55 years at entry into Whitehall II study in 1985. Main outcome measures: Fatal coronary heart disease, clinically verified incident non-fatal myocardial infarction, and definite angina (n=619, mean follow-up 12.5 years). Results: In Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position, positive affect (hazard ratio=1.01, 95{\%} confidence interval 0.82 to 1.24) and the balance between positive and negative affect, referred to as the affect balance score (hazard ratio=0.89, 0.73 to 1.09), were not associated with coronary heart disease. Further adjustment for behaviour related risk factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, daily fruit and vegetable intake, exercise, body mass index), biological risk factors (hypertension, blood cholesterol, diabetes), and psychological stress at work did not change these results. However, participants in the highest third of negative affect had an increased incidence of coronary events (hazard ratio=1.32, 1.09 to 1.60), and this association remained unchanged after adjustment for multiple confounders. Conclusions: Positive affect and affect balance did not seem to be predictive of future coronary heart disease in men and women who were free of diagnosed coronary heart disease at recruitment to the study. A weak positive association between negative affect and coronary heart disease was found and needs to be confirmed in further studies.",
author = "Hermann Nabi and Mika Kivimaki and {De Vogli}, Roberto and Marmot, {Michael G.} and Archana Singh-Manoux",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1136/bmj.a118",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "337",
pages = "32--36",
journal = "The BMJ",
issn = "0959-8146",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7660",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Positive and negative affect and risk of coronary heart disease

T2 - Whitehall II prospective cohort study

AU - Nabi, Hermann

AU - Kivimaki, Mika

AU - De Vogli, Roberto

AU - Marmot, Michael G.

AU - Singh-Manoux, Archana

PY - 2008/7/5

Y1 - 2008/7/5

N2 - Objective: To examine the associations between positive and negative affect and subsequent coronary heart disease events independently of established risk factors. Design: Prospective cohort study with follow-up over 12 years. Setting: 20 civil service departments originally located in London. Participants: 10 308 civil servants aged 35-55 years at entry into Whitehall II study in 1985. Main outcome measures: Fatal coronary heart disease, clinically verified incident non-fatal myocardial infarction, and definite angina (n=619, mean follow-up 12.5 years). Results: In Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position, positive affect (hazard ratio=1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.24) and the balance between positive and negative affect, referred to as the affect balance score (hazard ratio=0.89, 0.73 to 1.09), were not associated with coronary heart disease. Further adjustment for behaviour related risk factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, daily fruit and vegetable intake, exercise, body mass index), biological risk factors (hypertension, blood cholesterol, diabetes), and psychological stress at work did not change these results. However, participants in the highest third of negative affect had an increased incidence of coronary events (hazard ratio=1.32, 1.09 to 1.60), and this association remained unchanged after adjustment for multiple confounders. Conclusions: Positive affect and affect balance did not seem to be predictive of future coronary heart disease in men and women who were free of diagnosed coronary heart disease at recruitment to the study. A weak positive association between negative affect and coronary heart disease was found and needs to be confirmed in further studies.

AB - Objective: To examine the associations between positive and negative affect and subsequent coronary heart disease events independently of established risk factors. Design: Prospective cohort study with follow-up over 12 years. Setting: 20 civil service departments originally located in London. Participants: 10 308 civil servants aged 35-55 years at entry into Whitehall II study in 1985. Main outcome measures: Fatal coronary heart disease, clinically verified incident non-fatal myocardial infarction, and definite angina (n=619, mean follow-up 12.5 years). Results: In Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position, positive affect (hazard ratio=1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.24) and the balance between positive and negative affect, referred to as the affect balance score (hazard ratio=0.89, 0.73 to 1.09), were not associated with coronary heart disease. Further adjustment for behaviour related risk factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, daily fruit and vegetable intake, exercise, body mass index), biological risk factors (hypertension, blood cholesterol, diabetes), and psychological stress at work did not change these results. However, participants in the highest third of negative affect had an increased incidence of coronary events (hazard ratio=1.32, 1.09 to 1.60), and this association remained unchanged after adjustment for multiple confounders. Conclusions: Positive affect and affect balance did not seem to be predictive of future coronary heart disease in men and women who were free of diagnosed coronary heart disease at recruitment to the study. A weak positive association between negative affect and coronary heart disease was found and needs to be confirmed in further studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47149117601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=47149117601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.a118

DO - 10.1136/bmj.a118

M3 - Article

C2 - 18595926

AN - SCOPUS:47149117601

VL - 337

SP - 32

EP - 36

JO - The BMJ

JF - The BMJ

SN - 0959-8146

IS - 7660

ER -