Pooled versus individual genotyping in a breast cancer genome-wide association study

Ying Huang, David A. Hinds, Lihong Qi, Ross L. Prentice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations


We examine the measurement properties of pooled DNA odds ratio estimates for 7,357 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genotyped in a genome-wide association study of postmenopausal breast cancer. This study involved DNA pools formed from 125 cases or125 matched controls. Individual genotyping for these SNPs subsequently came available for a substantial majority of women included in seven pool pairs, providing the opportunity for a comparison of pooled DNA and individual odds ratio estimates and their variances. We find that the "per minor allele" odds ratio estimates from the pooled DNA comparisons agree fairly well with those from individual genotyping. Furthermore, the log-odds ratio variance estimates support a pooled DNA measurement model that we previously described, although with somewhat greater extra-binomial variation than was hypothesized in project design. Implications for the role of pooled DNA comparisons in the future genetic epidemiology research agenda are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)603-612
Number of pages10
JournalGenetic Epidemiology
Issue number6
StatePublished - Sep 2010


  • Breast cancer
  • Case-control studies
  • DNA pooling
  • GWAS
  • Odds ratio
  • SNP

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Epidemiology


Dive into the research topics of 'Pooled versus individual genotyping in a breast cancer genome-wide association study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this