Pooled time series regression analysis in longitudinal studies

Michael M. Ward, J Paul Leigh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many longitudinal studies attempt to examine changes in outcome measures over time in groups of patients. Applying conventional analytic techniques, such as a single classical linear regression model, to these data will often not result in minimum variance estimates, and may affect the results of tests of significance. Pooled time series regression analyses comprise a set of techniques that may be used in these instances to model changes in outcome measures over time. Pooling of time series data from many individuals may be done using two types of models: fixed effect models, which specify differences among individuals in separate intercept terms, and random effects models, which allow for differences among individuals by including an additional error component in the model. The choice between these alternative model specifications is guided by both theoretical and statistical considerations. This paper describes the use of pooled time series analysis, contrasts these methods with two classical linear regression approaches, and demonstrates these differences using two examples: a hypothetical study of serum glucose measurements in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis, and a longitudinal study of the development of functional disability in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. These methods may be applicable to the study of outcomes in many chronic illnesses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)645-659
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume46
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Longitudinal Studies
Regression Analysis
Linear Models
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Individuality
Diabetic Ketoacidosis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Chronic Disease
Glucose
Serum

Keywords

  • Longitudinal studies
  • Panel data
  • Time series analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Pooled time series regression analysis in longitudinal studies. / Ward, Michael M.; Leigh, J Paul.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 46, No. 7, 1993, p. 645-659.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7609314ca2944c1eb0e03451e0f1682c,
title = "Pooled time series regression analysis in longitudinal studies",
abstract = "Many longitudinal studies attempt to examine changes in outcome measures over time in groups of patients. Applying conventional analytic techniques, such as a single classical linear regression model, to these data will often not result in minimum variance estimates, and may affect the results of tests of significance. Pooled time series regression analyses comprise a set of techniques that may be used in these instances to model changes in outcome measures over time. Pooling of time series data from many individuals may be done using two types of models: fixed effect models, which specify differences among individuals in separate intercept terms, and random effects models, which allow for differences among individuals by including an additional error component in the model. The choice between these alternative model specifications is guided by both theoretical and statistical considerations. This paper describes the use of pooled time series analysis, contrasts these methods with two classical linear regression approaches, and demonstrates these differences using two examples: a hypothetical study of serum glucose measurements in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis, and a longitudinal study of the development of functional disability in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. These methods may be applicable to the study of outcomes in many chronic illnesses.",
keywords = "Longitudinal studies, Panel data, Time series analysis",
author = "Ward, {Michael M.} and Leigh, {J Paul}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/0895-4356(93)90038-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "645--659",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pooled time series regression analysis in longitudinal studies

AU - Ward, Michael M.

AU - Leigh, J Paul

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Many longitudinal studies attempt to examine changes in outcome measures over time in groups of patients. Applying conventional analytic techniques, such as a single classical linear regression model, to these data will often not result in minimum variance estimates, and may affect the results of tests of significance. Pooled time series regression analyses comprise a set of techniques that may be used in these instances to model changes in outcome measures over time. Pooling of time series data from many individuals may be done using two types of models: fixed effect models, which specify differences among individuals in separate intercept terms, and random effects models, which allow for differences among individuals by including an additional error component in the model. The choice between these alternative model specifications is guided by both theoretical and statistical considerations. This paper describes the use of pooled time series analysis, contrasts these methods with two classical linear regression approaches, and demonstrates these differences using two examples: a hypothetical study of serum glucose measurements in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis, and a longitudinal study of the development of functional disability in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. These methods may be applicable to the study of outcomes in many chronic illnesses.

AB - Many longitudinal studies attempt to examine changes in outcome measures over time in groups of patients. Applying conventional analytic techniques, such as a single classical linear regression model, to these data will often not result in minimum variance estimates, and may affect the results of tests of significance. Pooled time series regression analyses comprise a set of techniques that may be used in these instances to model changes in outcome measures over time. Pooling of time series data from many individuals may be done using two types of models: fixed effect models, which specify differences among individuals in separate intercept terms, and random effects models, which allow for differences among individuals by including an additional error component in the model. The choice between these alternative model specifications is guided by both theoretical and statistical considerations. This paper describes the use of pooled time series analysis, contrasts these methods with two classical linear regression approaches, and demonstrates these differences using two examples: a hypothetical study of serum glucose measurements in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis, and a longitudinal study of the development of functional disability in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. These methods may be applicable to the study of outcomes in many chronic illnesses.

KW - Longitudinal studies

KW - Panel data

KW - Time series analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027302056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027302056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90038-3

DO - 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90038-3

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 645

EP - 659

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 7

ER -