Physician satisfaction with patient encounters. Reliability and validity of an encounter-specific questionnaire.

B. E. Shore, Peter Franks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While patient satisfaction has been studied extensively and considered an outcome measure of physician-patient encounters, physician satisfaction has received limited consideration. The reliability and validity of an "encounter-specific" physician satisfaction scale were examined. The Delphi technique was used to develop a 39-item questionnaire comprising four hypothesized domains of physician satisfaction: interactive, personal, professional, and contextual. Factor analysis supported two of the four hypothesized categories. Exclusion of all items not contributing to the reliability of the two subscales or differentiating between high and low scores in an item analysis allowed a condensation of the scale. This 16-item scale was tested in a second phase of the study, which supported the reliability and validity of the two-dimension encounter-specific physician satisfaction scale. Further use of the scale may prove useful in exploring this neglected component of physician-patient encounters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)580-589
Number of pages10
JournalMedical Care
Volume24
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Satisfaction
Reproducibility of Results
physician
Physicians
questionnaire
Delphi Technique
item analysis
Statistical Factor Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires
factor analysis
exclusion
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Physician satisfaction with patient encounters. Reliability and validity of an encounter-specific questionnaire. / Shore, B. E.; Franks, Peter.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 24, No. 7, 07.1986, p. 580-589.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1e4be8ecef504c5ea7ee4243509447de,
title = "Physician satisfaction with patient encounters. Reliability and validity of an encounter-specific questionnaire.",
abstract = "While patient satisfaction has been studied extensively and considered an outcome measure of physician-patient encounters, physician satisfaction has received limited consideration. The reliability and validity of an {"}encounter-specific{"} physician satisfaction scale were examined. The Delphi technique was used to develop a 39-item questionnaire comprising four hypothesized domains of physician satisfaction: interactive, personal, professional, and contextual. Factor analysis supported two of the four hypothesized categories. Exclusion of all items not contributing to the reliability of the two subscales or differentiating between high and low scores in an item analysis allowed a condensation of the scale. This 16-item scale was tested in a second phase of the study, which supported the reliability and validity of the two-dimension encounter-specific physician satisfaction scale. Further use of the scale may prove useful in exploring this neglected component of physician-patient encounters.",
author = "Shore, {B. E.} and Peter Franks",
year = "1986",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "580--589",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physician satisfaction with patient encounters. Reliability and validity of an encounter-specific questionnaire.

AU - Shore, B. E.

AU - Franks, Peter

PY - 1986/7

Y1 - 1986/7

N2 - While patient satisfaction has been studied extensively and considered an outcome measure of physician-patient encounters, physician satisfaction has received limited consideration. The reliability and validity of an "encounter-specific" physician satisfaction scale were examined. The Delphi technique was used to develop a 39-item questionnaire comprising four hypothesized domains of physician satisfaction: interactive, personal, professional, and contextual. Factor analysis supported two of the four hypothesized categories. Exclusion of all items not contributing to the reliability of the two subscales or differentiating between high and low scores in an item analysis allowed a condensation of the scale. This 16-item scale was tested in a second phase of the study, which supported the reliability and validity of the two-dimension encounter-specific physician satisfaction scale. Further use of the scale may prove useful in exploring this neglected component of physician-patient encounters.

AB - While patient satisfaction has been studied extensively and considered an outcome measure of physician-patient encounters, physician satisfaction has received limited consideration. The reliability and validity of an "encounter-specific" physician satisfaction scale were examined. The Delphi technique was used to develop a 39-item questionnaire comprising four hypothesized domains of physician satisfaction: interactive, personal, professional, and contextual. Factor analysis supported two of the four hypothesized categories. Exclusion of all items not contributing to the reliability of the two subscales or differentiating between high and low scores in an item analysis allowed a condensation of the scale. This 16-item scale was tested in a second phase of the study, which supported the reliability and validity of the two-dimension encounter-specific physician satisfaction scale. Further use of the scale may prove useful in exploring this neglected component of physician-patient encounters.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022747767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022747767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3523064

AN - SCOPUS:0022747767

VL - 24

SP - 580

EP - 589

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 7

ER -