Physician participation in lethal injection executions

Teresa A. Zimmers, David Lubarsky

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lethal injection has come under fire as less than the peaceful, painless death it appears. Reevaluation of the process has sparked examination of the role of doctors in state-sponsored executions. RECENT FINDINGS: Physicians helped design the lethal injection protocol. Seventeen death penalty states require physician involvement and all practicing jurisdictions employ medical personnel. Doctors have signed death warrants, rendered inmates competent, provided intravenous access, monitored vital signs, administered lethal injections and declared death. Remarkably, lethal injections are administered remotely and neither physicians nor other execution personnel assess depth of anesthesia prior to injection of the painful lethal drugs. Recently physicians have helped precipitate an unprecedented public and judicial review of lethal injection through expert testimony in litigation and by publishing evidence of potential awareness in execution. In response, judges have ordered protocol modifications to extend further the tools and expertise of medicine into the execution chamber in order to ensure anesthesia. SUMMARY: Physician involvement created and perpetuates the seriously flawed protocol of lethal injection. Physicians and particularly anesthesiologists now have the opportunity to redress the mistakes of the past, and inform the growing debate over whether and potentially how medicine should be used to kill.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-151
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Opinion in Anaesthesiology
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Capital Punishment
Physicians
Anesthesia
Medicine
Vital Signs
Expert Testimony
Jurisprudence

Keywords

  • Capital punishment
  • Execution
  • Lethal injection
  • Medical ethics
  • Physician involvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Physician participation in lethal injection executions. / Zimmers, Teresa A.; Lubarsky, David.

In: Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.04.2007, p. 147-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{f64a44ac0ab84fc998e487bd7eecd747,
title = "Physician participation in lethal injection executions",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lethal injection has come under fire as less than the peaceful, painless death it appears. Reevaluation of the process has sparked examination of the role of doctors in state-sponsored executions. RECENT FINDINGS: Physicians helped design the lethal injection protocol. Seventeen death penalty states require physician involvement and all practicing jurisdictions employ medical personnel. Doctors have signed death warrants, rendered inmates competent, provided intravenous access, monitored vital signs, administered lethal injections and declared death. Remarkably, lethal injections are administered remotely and neither physicians nor other execution personnel assess depth of anesthesia prior to injection of the painful lethal drugs. Recently physicians have helped precipitate an unprecedented public and judicial review of lethal injection through expert testimony in litigation and by publishing evidence of potential awareness in execution. In response, judges have ordered protocol modifications to extend further the tools and expertise of medicine into the execution chamber in order to ensure anesthesia. SUMMARY: Physician involvement created and perpetuates the seriously flawed protocol of lethal injection. Physicians and particularly anesthesiologists now have the opportunity to redress the mistakes of the past, and inform the growing debate over whether and potentially how medicine should be used to kill.",
keywords = "Capital punishment, Execution, Lethal injection, Medical ethics, Physician involvement",
author = "Zimmers, {Teresa A.} and David Lubarsky",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACO.0b013e3280895ab7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "147--151",
journal = "Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology",
issn = "0952-7907",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physician participation in lethal injection executions

AU - Zimmers, Teresa A.

AU - Lubarsky, David

PY - 2007/4/1

Y1 - 2007/4/1

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lethal injection has come under fire as less than the peaceful, painless death it appears. Reevaluation of the process has sparked examination of the role of doctors in state-sponsored executions. RECENT FINDINGS: Physicians helped design the lethal injection protocol. Seventeen death penalty states require physician involvement and all practicing jurisdictions employ medical personnel. Doctors have signed death warrants, rendered inmates competent, provided intravenous access, monitored vital signs, administered lethal injections and declared death. Remarkably, lethal injections are administered remotely and neither physicians nor other execution personnel assess depth of anesthesia prior to injection of the painful lethal drugs. Recently physicians have helped precipitate an unprecedented public and judicial review of lethal injection through expert testimony in litigation and by publishing evidence of potential awareness in execution. In response, judges have ordered protocol modifications to extend further the tools and expertise of medicine into the execution chamber in order to ensure anesthesia. SUMMARY: Physician involvement created and perpetuates the seriously flawed protocol of lethal injection. Physicians and particularly anesthesiologists now have the opportunity to redress the mistakes of the past, and inform the growing debate over whether and potentially how medicine should be used to kill.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lethal injection has come under fire as less than the peaceful, painless death it appears. Reevaluation of the process has sparked examination of the role of doctors in state-sponsored executions. RECENT FINDINGS: Physicians helped design the lethal injection protocol. Seventeen death penalty states require physician involvement and all practicing jurisdictions employ medical personnel. Doctors have signed death warrants, rendered inmates competent, provided intravenous access, monitored vital signs, administered lethal injections and declared death. Remarkably, lethal injections are administered remotely and neither physicians nor other execution personnel assess depth of anesthesia prior to injection of the painful lethal drugs. Recently physicians have helped precipitate an unprecedented public and judicial review of lethal injection through expert testimony in litigation and by publishing evidence of potential awareness in execution. In response, judges have ordered protocol modifications to extend further the tools and expertise of medicine into the execution chamber in order to ensure anesthesia. SUMMARY: Physician involvement created and perpetuates the seriously flawed protocol of lethal injection. Physicians and particularly anesthesiologists now have the opportunity to redress the mistakes of the past, and inform the growing debate over whether and potentially how medicine should be used to kill.

KW - Capital punishment

KW - Execution

KW - Lethal injection

KW - Medical ethics

KW - Physician involvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247134512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247134512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3280895ab7

DO - 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3280895ab7

M3 - Review article

C2 - 17413399

AN - SCOPUS:34247134512

VL - 20

SP - 147

EP - 151

JO - Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

JF - Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

SN - 0952-7907

IS - 2

ER -