Physician communication regarding prostate cancer screening

Analysis of unannounced standardized patient visits

Bo Feng, Malathi Srinivasan, Jerome R. Hoffman, Julie A. Rainwater, Erin Griffin, Marko Dragojevic, Frank C. Day, Michael S Wilkes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a controversial issue. The present study aimed to explore physician behaviors during an unannounced standardized patient encounter that was part of a randomized controlled trial to educate physicians using a prostate cancer screening, interactive, Web-based module. Methods Participants included 118 internal medicine and family medicine physicians from 5 health systems in California, in 2007-2008. Control physicians received usual education about prostate cancer screening (brochures from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention). Intervention physicians participated in the prostate cancer screening module. Within 3 months, all physicians saw unannounced standardized patients who prompted prostate cancer screening discussions in clinic. The encounter was audio-recorded, and the recordings were transcribed. Authors analyzed physician behaviors around screening: (1) engagement after prompting, (2) degree of shared decision making, and (3) final recommendations for prostate cancer screening. Results After prompting, 90% of physicians discussed prostate cancer screening. In comparison with control physicians, intervention physicians showed somewhat more shared decision making behaviors (intervention 14 items vs control 11 items, P <.05), were more likely to mention no screening as an option (intervention 63% vs control 26%, P <.05), to encourage patients to consider different screening options (intervention 62% vs control 39%, P <.05) and seeking input from others (intervention 25% vs control 7%, P <.05). Conclusions A brief Web-based interactive educational intervention can improve shared decision making, neutrality in recommendation, and reduce PSA test ordering. Engaging patients in discussion of the uses and limitations of tests with uncertain value can decrease utilization of the tests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)315-323
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms
Communication
Physicians
Decision Making
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Pamphlets
Family Physicians
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Internal Medicine
Randomized Controlled Trials
Medicine
Education
Health

Keywords

  • Health communication
  • Medical education
  • Patient-centered care
  • Primary care
  • Prostate cancer
  • Prostate cancer screening
  • Qualitative analysis
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Risk-benefit assessment
  • Shared decision making
  • Unannounced standardized patients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Physician communication regarding prostate cancer screening : Analysis of unannounced standardized patient visits. / Feng, Bo; Srinivasan, Malathi; Hoffman, Jerome R.; Rainwater, Julie A.; Griffin, Erin; Dragojevic, Marko; Day, Frank C.; Wilkes, Michael S.

In: Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 4, 07.2013, p. 315-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Feng, Bo ; Srinivasan, Malathi ; Hoffman, Jerome R. ; Rainwater, Julie A. ; Griffin, Erin ; Dragojevic, Marko ; Day, Frank C. ; Wilkes, Michael S. / Physician communication regarding prostate cancer screening : Analysis of unannounced standardized patient visits. In: Annals of Family Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 315-323.
@article{016f9a915d41480eb720a1684c27c43f,
title = "Physician communication regarding prostate cancer screening: Analysis of unannounced standardized patient visits",
abstract = "Purpose Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a controversial issue. The present study aimed to explore physician behaviors during an unannounced standardized patient encounter that was part of a randomized controlled trial to educate physicians using a prostate cancer screening, interactive, Web-based module. Methods Participants included 118 internal medicine and family medicine physicians from 5 health systems in California, in 2007-2008. Control physicians received usual education about prostate cancer screening (brochures from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention). Intervention physicians participated in the prostate cancer screening module. Within 3 months, all physicians saw unannounced standardized patients who prompted prostate cancer screening discussions in clinic. The encounter was audio-recorded, and the recordings were transcribed. Authors analyzed physician behaviors around screening: (1) engagement after prompting, (2) degree of shared decision making, and (3) final recommendations for prostate cancer screening. Results After prompting, 90{\%} of physicians discussed prostate cancer screening. In comparison with control physicians, intervention physicians showed somewhat more shared decision making behaviors (intervention 14 items vs control 11 items, P <.05), were more likely to mention no screening as an option (intervention 63{\%} vs control 26{\%}, P <.05), to encourage patients to consider different screening options (intervention 62{\%} vs control 39{\%}, P <.05) and seeking input from others (intervention 25{\%} vs control 7{\%}, P <.05). Conclusions A brief Web-based interactive educational intervention can improve shared decision making, neutrality in recommendation, and reduce PSA test ordering. Engaging patients in discussion of the uses and limitations of tests with uncertain value can decrease utilization of the tests.",
keywords = "Health communication, Medical education, Patient-centered care, Primary care, Prostate cancer, Prostate cancer screening, Qualitative analysis, Randomized controlled trial, Risk-benefit assessment, Shared decision making, Unannounced standardized patients",
author = "Bo Feng and Malathi Srinivasan and Hoffman, {Jerome R.} and Rainwater, {Julie A.} and Erin Griffin and Marko Dragojevic and Day, {Frank C.} and Wilkes, {Michael S}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1370/afm.1509",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "315--323",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physician communication regarding prostate cancer screening

T2 - Analysis of unannounced standardized patient visits

AU - Feng, Bo

AU - Srinivasan, Malathi

AU - Hoffman, Jerome R.

AU - Rainwater, Julie A.

AU - Griffin, Erin

AU - Dragojevic, Marko

AU - Day, Frank C.

AU - Wilkes, Michael S

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Purpose Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a controversial issue. The present study aimed to explore physician behaviors during an unannounced standardized patient encounter that was part of a randomized controlled trial to educate physicians using a prostate cancer screening, interactive, Web-based module. Methods Participants included 118 internal medicine and family medicine physicians from 5 health systems in California, in 2007-2008. Control physicians received usual education about prostate cancer screening (brochures from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention). Intervention physicians participated in the prostate cancer screening module. Within 3 months, all physicians saw unannounced standardized patients who prompted prostate cancer screening discussions in clinic. The encounter was audio-recorded, and the recordings were transcribed. Authors analyzed physician behaviors around screening: (1) engagement after prompting, (2) degree of shared decision making, and (3) final recommendations for prostate cancer screening. Results After prompting, 90% of physicians discussed prostate cancer screening. In comparison with control physicians, intervention physicians showed somewhat more shared decision making behaviors (intervention 14 items vs control 11 items, P <.05), were more likely to mention no screening as an option (intervention 63% vs control 26%, P <.05), to encourage patients to consider different screening options (intervention 62% vs control 39%, P <.05) and seeking input from others (intervention 25% vs control 7%, P <.05). Conclusions A brief Web-based interactive educational intervention can improve shared decision making, neutrality in recommendation, and reduce PSA test ordering. Engaging patients in discussion of the uses and limitations of tests with uncertain value can decrease utilization of the tests.

AB - Purpose Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a controversial issue. The present study aimed to explore physician behaviors during an unannounced standardized patient encounter that was part of a randomized controlled trial to educate physicians using a prostate cancer screening, interactive, Web-based module. Methods Participants included 118 internal medicine and family medicine physicians from 5 health systems in California, in 2007-2008. Control physicians received usual education about prostate cancer screening (brochures from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention). Intervention physicians participated in the prostate cancer screening module. Within 3 months, all physicians saw unannounced standardized patients who prompted prostate cancer screening discussions in clinic. The encounter was audio-recorded, and the recordings were transcribed. Authors analyzed physician behaviors around screening: (1) engagement after prompting, (2) degree of shared decision making, and (3) final recommendations for prostate cancer screening. Results After prompting, 90% of physicians discussed prostate cancer screening. In comparison with control physicians, intervention physicians showed somewhat more shared decision making behaviors (intervention 14 items vs control 11 items, P <.05), were more likely to mention no screening as an option (intervention 63% vs control 26%, P <.05), to encourage patients to consider different screening options (intervention 62% vs control 39%, P <.05) and seeking input from others (intervention 25% vs control 7%, P <.05). Conclusions A brief Web-based interactive educational intervention can improve shared decision making, neutrality in recommendation, and reduce PSA test ordering. Engaging patients in discussion of the uses and limitations of tests with uncertain value can decrease utilization of the tests.

KW - Health communication

KW - Medical education

KW - Patient-centered care

KW - Primary care

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Prostate cancer screening

KW - Qualitative analysis

KW - Randomized controlled trial

KW - Risk-benefit assessment

KW - Shared decision making

KW - Unannounced standardized patients

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880061714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880061714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.1509

DO - 10.1370/afm.1509

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 315

EP - 323

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 4

ER -