Perioperative cardiac evaluation of simulated patients by practicing anesthesiologists is not consistent with 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines

Michael M. Vigoda, Vicente Behrens, Nikola Miljkovic, Kristopher L. Arheart, David Lubarsky, Richard P. Dutton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objective: To determine if practicing anesthesiologists recommend preoperative evaluations consistent with the 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines on perioperative care. Design: Survey instrument. Setting: Academic medical center. Subjects: ASA membership. Measurements: In this Web-based survey, participants were presented with 6 clinical scenarios characterized by surgical procedure and the patient's clinical condition (ie, clinical risk factors and functional capacity). Scenarios and possible recommendations were presented randomly. Participants were asked to select the recommendation they considered to be most consistent with the Guidelines. The percentage of participants selecting the recommendation most consistent with the 2007 Guidelines was recorded. Main Results: Of the 22,504 actively practicing members of the ASA who were sent a survey, 1,595 actively practicing self-selected anesthesiologists responded. For one of 6 scenarios, patients with an active cardiac condition, the upper 95% confidence bound for the percent selecting a recommendation consistent with the Guidelines was 82%. For the remaining 5 scenarios, the upper 95% confidence bound for the percent of anesthesiologists with an appropriate recommendation did not exceed 40%. With the exception of the scenario describing a patient with an active cardiac condition, respondents were more likely to provide recommendations consistent with the Guidelines if they had been in practice less than 5 years or worked in a teaching environment. Conclusion: When evaluating simulated patients, practicing anesthesiologists who are ASA members did not recommend preoperative evaluations that were consistent with the 2007 ACC/AHA Guidelines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)446-455
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Guidelines
Perioperative Care
Anesthesiologists
Teaching
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Anesthesiologists
  • Cost-effective care
  • Guideline adherence
  • Guidelines
  • Preoperative evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Perioperative cardiac evaluation of simulated patients by practicing anesthesiologists is not consistent with 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines. / Vigoda, Michael M.; Behrens, Vicente; Miljkovic, Nikola; Arheart, Kristopher L.; Lubarsky, David; Dutton, Richard P.

In: Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, Vol. 24, No. 6, 01.09.2012, p. 446-455.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vigoda, Michael M. ; Behrens, Vicente ; Miljkovic, Nikola ; Arheart, Kristopher L. ; Lubarsky, David ; Dutton, Richard P. / Perioperative cardiac evaluation of simulated patients by practicing anesthesiologists is not consistent with 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines. In: Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2012 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 446-455.
@article{94229dd1762845d48e55616affa1c0e2,
title = "Perioperative cardiac evaluation of simulated patients by practicing anesthesiologists is not consistent with 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines",
abstract = "Study Objective: To determine if practicing anesthesiologists recommend preoperative evaluations consistent with the 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines on perioperative care. Design: Survey instrument. Setting: Academic medical center. Subjects: ASA membership. Measurements: In this Web-based survey, participants were presented with 6 clinical scenarios characterized by surgical procedure and the patient's clinical condition (ie, clinical risk factors and functional capacity). Scenarios and possible recommendations were presented randomly. Participants were asked to select the recommendation they considered to be most consistent with the Guidelines. The percentage of participants selecting the recommendation most consistent with the 2007 Guidelines was recorded. Main Results: Of the 22,504 actively practicing members of the ASA who were sent a survey, 1,595 actively practicing self-selected anesthesiologists responded. For one of 6 scenarios, patients with an active cardiac condition, the upper 95{\%} confidence bound for the percent selecting a recommendation consistent with the Guidelines was 82{\%}. For the remaining 5 scenarios, the upper 95{\%} confidence bound for the percent of anesthesiologists with an appropriate recommendation did not exceed 40{\%}. With the exception of the scenario describing a patient with an active cardiac condition, respondents were more likely to provide recommendations consistent with the Guidelines if they had been in practice less than 5 years or worked in a teaching environment. Conclusion: When evaluating simulated patients, practicing anesthesiologists who are ASA members did not recommend preoperative evaluations that were consistent with the 2007 ACC/AHA Guidelines.",
keywords = "Anesthesiologists, Cost-effective care, Guideline adherence, Guidelines, Preoperative evaluation",
author = "Vigoda, {Michael M.} and Vicente Behrens and Nikola Miljkovic and Arheart, {Kristopher L.} and David Lubarsky and Dutton, {Richard P.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.11.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "446--455",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Anesthesia",
issn = "0952-8180",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perioperative cardiac evaluation of simulated patients by practicing anesthesiologists is not consistent with 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines

AU - Vigoda, Michael M.

AU - Behrens, Vicente

AU - Miljkovic, Nikola

AU - Arheart, Kristopher L.

AU - Lubarsky, David

AU - Dutton, Richard P.

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - Study Objective: To determine if practicing anesthesiologists recommend preoperative evaluations consistent with the 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines on perioperative care. Design: Survey instrument. Setting: Academic medical center. Subjects: ASA membership. Measurements: In this Web-based survey, participants were presented with 6 clinical scenarios characterized by surgical procedure and the patient's clinical condition (ie, clinical risk factors and functional capacity). Scenarios and possible recommendations were presented randomly. Participants were asked to select the recommendation they considered to be most consistent with the Guidelines. The percentage of participants selecting the recommendation most consistent with the 2007 Guidelines was recorded. Main Results: Of the 22,504 actively practicing members of the ASA who were sent a survey, 1,595 actively practicing self-selected anesthesiologists responded. For one of 6 scenarios, patients with an active cardiac condition, the upper 95% confidence bound for the percent selecting a recommendation consistent with the Guidelines was 82%. For the remaining 5 scenarios, the upper 95% confidence bound for the percent of anesthesiologists with an appropriate recommendation did not exceed 40%. With the exception of the scenario describing a patient with an active cardiac condition, respondents were more likely to provide recommendations consistent with the Guidelines if they had been in practice less than 5 years or worked in a teaching environment. Conclusion: When evaluating simulated patients, practicing anesthesiologists who are ASA members did not recommend preoperative evaluations that were consistent with the 2007 ACC/AHA Guidelines.

AB - Study Objective: To determine if practicing anesthesiologists recommend preoperative evaluations consistent with the 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines on perioperative care. Design: Survey instrument. Setting: Academic medical center. Subjects: ASA membership. Measurements: In this Web-based survey, participants were presented with 6 clinical scenarios characterized by surgical procedure and the patient's clinical condition (ie, clinical risk factors and functional capacity). Scenarios and possible recommendations were presented randomly. Participants were asked to select the recommendation they considered to be most consistent with the Guidelines. The percentage of participants selecting the recommendation most consistent with the 2007 Guidelines was recorded. Main Results: Of the 22,504 actively practicing members of the ASA who were sent a survey, 1,595 actively practicing self-selected anesthesiologists responded. For one of 6 scenarios, patients with an active cardiac condition, the upper 95% confidence bound for the percent selecting a recommendation consistent with the Guidelines was 82%. For the remaining 5 scenarios, the upper 95% confidence bound for the percent of anesthesiologists with an appropriate recommendation did not exceed 40%. With the exception of the scenario describing a patient with an active cardiac condition, respondents were more likely to provide recommendations consistent with the Guidelines if they had been in practice less than 5 years or worked in a teaching environment. Conclusion: When evaluating simulated patients, practicing anesthesiologists who are ASA members did not recommend preoperative evaluations that were consistent with the 2007 ACC/AHA Guidelines.

KW - Anesthesiologists

KW - Cost-effective care

KW - Guideline adherence

KW - Guidelines

KW - Preoperative evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866394239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866394239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.11.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.11.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 22658810

AN - SCOPUS:84866394239

VL - 24

SP - 446

EP - 455

JO - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

SN - 0952-8180

IS - 6

ER -