Performance of abdominal ultrasonography in pediatric blunt trauma patients: a meta-analysis

James F Holmes Jr, Aaron Gladman, Cindy H. Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

102 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to obtain the best estimates of the test performance of abdominal ultrasonography (US) for identifying children with intraabdominal injuries (IAIs). Methods: We gathered studies on the use of abdominal US in injured children from the following sources: a MEDLINE and Embase search, hand searches of 5 specialty journals and 4 clinical textbooks, the bibliographies of all identified articles, and contact with experts. Both prospective and retrospective studies were included if they used abdominal US for the detection of intraperitoneal fluid or IAIs in blunt trauma patients less than 18 years of age. All authors independently abstracted data from the selected studies. Disagreements between abstractors were resolved by mutual agreement. Results: Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria, and 3838 children evaluated with abdominal US were included. Abdominal US had the following test characteristics for identifying children with hemoperitoneum: sensitivity, 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76%-84%); specificity, 96% (95% CI 95%-97%); positive likelihood ratio, 22.9 (95% CI 17.2-30.5); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.2 (95% CI 0.16-0.25). Using the most methodologically rigorous studies, however, yielded the following test characteristics of abdominal US for identifying children with hemoperitoneum: sensitivity, 66% (95% CI 56%-75%); specificity, 95% (95% CI 93%-97%); positive likelihood ratio, 14.5 (95% CI 9.5-22.1); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.36 (95% CI 0.27-0.47). Conclusions: Abdominal US has a modest sensitivity for the detection of children with hemoperitoneum; however, its test performance characteristics worsen when only the most methodologically rigorous articles are included. A negative US examination has questionable utility as the sole diagnostic test to rule out the presence of IAI. Because of the high risk of IAI, a hemodynamically stable child with a positive US examination should immediately undergo abdominal computed tomographic scanning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1588-1594
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume42
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Ultrasonography
Pediatrics
Confidence Intervals
Wounds and Injuries
Hemoperitoneum
Nonpenetrating Wounds
Textbooks
Bibliography
Routine Diagnostic Tests
MEDLINE
Retrospective Studies
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma
  • Intraabdominal injuries
  • Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Performance of abdominal ultrasonography in pediatric blunt trauma patients : a meta-analysis. / Holmes Jr, James F; Gladman, Aaron; Chang, Cindy H.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 42, No. 9, 09.2007, p. 1588-1594.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b7e58361d97b4926894fad63e875489b,
title = "Performance of abdominal ultrasonography in pediatric blunt trauma patients: a meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of the study was to obtain the best estimates of the test performance of abdominal ultrasonography (US) for identifying children with intraabdominal injuries (IAIs). Methods: We gathered studies on the use of abdominal US in injured children from the following sources: a MEDLINE and Embase search, hand searches of 5 specialty journals and 4 clinical textbooks, the bibliographies of all identified articles, and contact with experts. Both prospective and retrospective studies were included if they used abdominal US for the detection of intraperitoneal fluid or IAIs in blunt trauma patients less than 18 years of age. All authors independently abstracted data from the selected studies. Disagreements between abstractors were resolved by mutual agreement. Results: Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria, and 3838 children evaluated with abdominal US were included. Abdominal US had the following test characteristics for identifying children with hemoperitoneum: sensitivity, 80{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 76{\%}-84{\%}); specificity, 96{\%} (95{\%} CI 95{\%}-97{\%}); positive likelihood ratio, 22.9 (95{\%} CI 17.2-30.5); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.2 (95{\%} CI 0.16-0.25). Using the most methodologically rigorous studies, however, yielded the following test characteristics of abdominal US for identifying children with hemoperitoneum: sensitivity, 66{\%} (95{\%} CI 56{\%}-75{\%}); specificity, 95{\%} (95{\%} CI 93{\%}-97{\%}); positive likelihood ratio, 14.5 (95{\%} CI 9.5-22.1); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.36 (95{\%} CI 0.27-0.47). Conclusions: Abdominal US has a modest sensitivity for the detection of children with hemoperitoneum; however, its test performance characteristics worsen when only the most methodologically rigorous articles are included. A negative US examination has questionable utility as the sole diagnostic test to rule out the presence of IAI. Because of the high risk of IAI, a hemodynamically stable child with a positive US examination should immediately undergo abdominal computed tomographic scanning.",
keywords = "Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma, Intraabdominal injuries, Ultrasonography",
author = "{Holmes Jr}, {James F} and Aaron Gladman and Chang, {Cindy H.}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.04.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "1588--1594",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance of abdominal ultrasonography in pediatric blunt trauma patients

T2 - a meta-analysis

AU - Holmes Jr, James F

AU - Gladman, Aaron

AU - Chang, Cindy H.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - Objective: The objective of the study was to obtain the best estimates of the test performance of abdominal ultrasonography (US) for identifying children with intraabdominal injuries (IAIs). Methods: We gathered studies on the use of abdominal US in injured children from the following sources: a MEDLINE and Embase search, hand searches of 5 specialty journals and 4 clinical textbooks, the bibliographies of all identified articles, and contact with experts. Both prospective and retrospective studies were included if they used abdominal US for the detection of intraperitoneal fluid or IAIs in blunt trauma patients less than 18 years of age. All authors independently abstracted data from the selected studies. Disagreements between abstractors were resolved by mutual agreement. Results: Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria, and 3838 children evaluated with abdominal US were included. Abdominal US had the following test characteristics for identifying children with hemoperitoneum: sensitivity, 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76%-84%); specificity, 96% (95% CI 95%-97%); positive likelihood ratio, 22.9 (95% CI 17.2-30.5); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.2 (95% CI 0.16-0.25). Using the most methodologically rigorous studies, however, yielded the following test characteristics of abdominal US for identifying children with hemoperitoneum: sensitivity, 66% (95% CI 56%-75%); specificity, 95% (95% CI 93%-97%); positive likelihood ratio, 14.5 (95% CI 9.5-22.1); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.36 (95% CI 0.27-0.47). Conclusions: Abdominal US has a modest sensitivity for the detection of children with hemoperitoneum; however, its test performance characteristics worsen when only the most methodologically rigorous articles are included. A negative US examination has questionable utility as the sole diagnostic test to rule out the presence of IAI. Because of the high risk of IAI, a hemodynamically stable child with a positive US examination should immediately undergo abdominal computed tomographic scanning.

AB - Objective: The objective of the study was to obtain the best estimates of the test performance of abdominal ultrasonography (US) for identifying children with intraabdominal injuries (IAIs). Methods: We gathered studies on the use of abdominal US in injured children from the following sources: a MEDLINE and Embase search, hand searches of 5 specialty journals and 4 clinical textbooks, the bibliographies of all identified articles, and contact with experts. Both prospective and retrospective studies were included if they used abdominal US for the detection of intraperitoneal fluid or IAIs in blunt trauma patients less than 18 years of age. All authors independently abstracted data from the selected studies. Disagreements between abstractors were resolved by mutual agreement. Results: Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria, and 3838 children evaluated with abdominal US were included. Abdominal US had the following test characteristics for identifying children with hemoperitoneum: sensitivity, 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76%-84%); specificity, 96% (95% CI 95%-97%); positive likelihood ratio, 22.9 (95% CI 17.2-30.5); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.2 (95% CI 0.16-0.25). Using the most methodologically rigorous studies, however, yielded the following test characteristics of abdominal US for identifying children with hemoperitoneum: sensitivity, 66% (95% CI 56%-75%); specificity, 95% (95% CI 93%-97%); positive likelihood ratio, 14.5 (95% CI 9.5-22.1); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.36 (95% CI 0.27-0.47). Conclusions: Abdominal US has a modest sensitivity for the detection of children with hemoperitoneum; however, its test performance characteristics worsen when only the most methodologically rigorous articles are included. A negative US examination has questionable utility as the sole diagnostic test to rule out the presence of IAI. Because of the high risk of IAI, a hemodynamically stable child with a positive US examination should immediately undergo abdominal computed tomographic scanning.

KW - Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma

KW - Intraabdominal injuries

KW - Ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548428386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548428386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.04.023

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.04.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 17848254

AN - SCOPUS:34548428386

VL - 42

SP - 1588

EP - 1594

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 9

ER -