Performance and limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) scanners for imaging very low activity sources

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Emerging applications for positron emission tomography (PET) may require the ability to image very low activity source distributions in the body. The performance of clinical PET scanners in the regime where activity in the field of view is <1MBq has not previously been explored. In this study, we compared the counting rate performance of two clinical PET/CT scanners, the Siemens Biograph Reveal 16 scanner which is based on lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) detectors and the GE Discovery-ST scanner which is based on bismuth germanate (BGO) detectors using a modified National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2007 protocol. Across the activity range studied (2-100kBq/mL in a 5.5mL line source in the NEMA scatter phantom), the BGO-based scanner significantly outperformed the LSO-based scanner. This was largely due to the effect of background counts emanating from naturally occurring but radioactive 176Lu within the LSO detector material, which dominates the observed counting rate at the lowest activities. Increasing the lower energy threshold from 350keV to 425keV in an attempt to reduce this background did not significantly improve the measured NECR performance. The measured singles rate due to 176Lu emissions within the scanner energy window was also found to be dependent on temperature, and to be affected by the operation of the CT component, making approaches to correct or compensate for the background more challenging. We conclude that for PET studies in a very low activity range, BGO-based scanners are likely to have better performance because of the lack of significant background.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-110
Number of pages7
JournalPhysica Medica
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Positron-Emission Tomography
scanners
positrons
tomography
detectors
counting
lutetium
Temperature
bismuth
field of view
emerging
thresholds
energy

Keywords

  • Low activity
  • Performance
  • Positron emission tomography scanners

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Performance and limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) scanners for imaging very low activity sources. / Freedenberg, Melissa I.; Badawi, Ramsey D; Tarantal, Alice F; Cherry, Simon R.

In: Physica Medica, Vol. 30, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 104-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b1e54f32c4dd44ffb0e2ad51a1b7060c,
title = "Performance and limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) scanners for imaging very low activity sources",
abstract = "Emerging applications for positron emission tomography (PET) may require the ability to image very low activity source distributions in the body. The performance of clinical PET scanners in the regime where activity in the field of view is <1MBq has not previously been explored. In this study, we compared the counting rate performance of two clinical PET/CT scanners, the Siemens Biograph Reveal 16 scanner which is based on lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) detectors and the GE Discovery-ST scanner which is based on bismuth germanate (BGO) detectors using a modified National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2007 protocol. Across the activity range studied (2-100kBq/mL in a 5.5mL line source in the NEMA scatter phantom), the BGO-based scanner significantly outperformed the LSO-based scanner. This was largely due to the effect of background counts emanating from naturally occurring but radioactive 176Lu within the LSO detector material, which dominates the observed counting rate at the lowest activities. Increasing the lower energy threshold from 350keV to 425keV in an attempt to reduce this background did not significantly improve the measured NECR performance. The measured singles rate due to 176Lu emissions within the scanner energy window was also found to be dependent on temperature, and to be affected by the operation of the CT component, making approaches to correct or compensate for the background more challenging. We conclude that for PET studies in a very low activity range, BGO-based scanners are likely to have better performance because of the lack of significant background.",
keywords = "Low activity, Performance, Positron emission tomography scanners",
author = "Freedenberg, {Melissa I.} and Badawi, {Ramsey D} and Tarantal, {Alice F} and Cherry, {Simon R}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.04.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "104--110",
journal = "Physica Medica",
issn = "1120-1797",
publisher = "Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance and limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) scanners for imaging very low activity sources

AU - Freedenberg, Melissa I.

AU - Badawi, Ramsey D

AU - Tarantal, Alice F

AU - Cherry, Simon R

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Emerging applications for positron emission tomography (PET) may require the ability to image very low activity source distributions in the body. The performance of clinical PET scanners in the regime where activity in the field of view is <1MBq has not previously been explored. In this study, we compared the counting rate performance of two clinical PET/CT scanners, the Siemens Biograph Reveal 16 scanner which is based on lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) detectors and the GE Discovery-ST scanner which is based on bismuth germanate (BGO) detectors using a modified National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2007 protocol. Across the activity range studied (2-100kBq/mL in a 5.5mL line source in the NEMA scatter phantom), the BGO-based scanner significantly outperformed the LSO-based scanner. This was largely due to the effect of background counts emanating from naturally occurring but radioactive 176Lu within the LSO detector material, which dominates the observed counting rate at the lowest activities. Increasing the lower energy threshold from 350keV to 425keV in an attempt to reduce this background did not significantly improve the measured NECR performance. The measured singles rate due to 176Lu emissions within the scanner energy window was also found to be dependent on temperature, and to be affected by the operation of the CT component, making approaches to correct or compensate for the background more challenging. We conclude that for PET studies in a very low activity range, BGO-based scanners are likely to have better performance because of the lack of significant background.

AB - Emerging applications for positron emission tomography (PET) may require the ability to image very low activity source distributions in the body. The performance of clinical PET scanners in the regime where activity in the field of view is <1MBq has not previously been explored. In this study, we compared the counting rate performance of two clinical PET/CT scanners, the Siemens Biograph Reveal 16 scanner which is based on lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) detectors and the GE Discovery-ST scanner which is based on bismuth germanate (BGO) detectors using a modified National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2007 protocol. Across the activity range studied (2-100kBq/mL in a 5.5mL line source in the NEMA scatter phantom), the BGO-based scanner significantly outperformed the LSO-based scanner. This was largely due to the effect of background counts emanating from naturally occurring but radioactive 176Lu within the LSO detector material, which dominates the observed counting rate at the lowest activities. Increasing the lower energy threshold from 350keV to 425keV in an attempt to reduce this background did not significantly improve the measured NECR performance. The measured singles rate due to 176Lu emissions within the scanner energy window was also found to be dependent on temperature, and to be affected by the operation of the CT component, making approaches to correct or compensate for the background more challenging. We conclude that for PET studies in a very low activity range, BGO-based scanners are likely to have better performance because of the lack of significant background.

KW - Low activity

KW - Performance

KW - Positron emission tomography scanners

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890117094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890117094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.04.001

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 104

EP - 110

JO - Physica Medica

JF - Physica Medica

SN - 1120-1797

IS - 1

ER -