Percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses using 25-gauge needles

Sukru Mehmet Erturk, Stuart Silverman, Koenraad Mortele, Ramit Lamba, Kemal Tuncali, Eric Vansonnenberg, Edmund Cibas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using 25-gauge needles to biopsy abdominal masses. Material and methods: A 6-month period of using 25-gauge needles (study group) as the only needle (n = 98) or the initial needle (n = 24) to biopsy abdominal masses was analyzed retrospectively. Diagnostic rate, sensitivity, negative predictive value, complication rate, and number of passes were compared with the same parameters obtained during the preceding 6 months during which 117 abdominal masses were biopsied and 25-gauge needles were not used (control group). There were no significant differences in patient age, gender distribution, or difficulty ratio of biopsies (path length divided by mass diameter) between the groups. Results: Diagnostic rates, sensitivities, and negative predictive values of biopsies in the study group (90.9% (111/122), 91.8%, (89/97), and 63.6% (14/22), respectively), were not significantly different from those in the control group (91.5% (107/117), 97.8% (91/93), and 87.5% (14/16), respectively). There were no major complications in either group; the complication rate in the control group (5.9%, 6/122) was not significantly different from the study group (4.9%, 7/117). Number of passes was significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group (mean values of 4.91 and 4.44, respectively, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Abdominal masses can be biopsied with 25-gauge needles, either alone or prior to larger needles, just as effectively and safely as with larger needles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)70-74
Number of pages5
JournalAbdominal Imaging
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Needles
Biopsy
Control Groups
Age Distribution
Needle Biopsy
Safety

Keywords

  • 22 Gauge
  • 25 Gauge
  • Abdominal masses
  • Biopsy
  • Fine needle aspiration biopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Urology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Erturk, S. M., Silverman, S., Mortele, K., Lamba, R., Tuncali, K., Vansonnenberg, E., & Cibas, E. (2010). Percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses using 25-gauge needles. Abdominal Imaging, 35(1), 70-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9492-5

Percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses using 25-gauge needles. / Erturk, Sukru Mehmet; Silverman, Stuart; Mortele, Koenraad; Lamba, Ramit; Tuncali, Kemal; Vansonnenberg, Eric; Cibas, Edmund.

In: Abdominal Imaging, Vol. 35, No. 1, 02.2010, p. 70-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Erturk, SM, Silverman, S, Mortele, K, Lamba, R, Tuncali, K, Vansonnenberg, E & Cibas, E 2010, 'Percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses using 25-gauge needles', Abdominal Imaging, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 70-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9492-5
Erturk SM, Silverman S, Mortele K, Lamba R, Tuncali K, Vansonnenberg E et al. Percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses using 25-gauge needles. Abdominal Imaging. 2010 Feb;35(1):70-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9492-5
Erturk, Sukru Mehmet ; Silverman, Stuart ; Mortele, Koenraad ; Lamba, Ramit ; Tuncali, Kemal ; Vansonnenberg, Eric ; Cibas, Edmund. / Percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses using 25-gauge needles. In: Abdominal Imaging. 2010 ; Vol. 35, No. 1. pp. 70-74.
@article{9a691f635e2d46359e8bed07fd0bf5db,
title = "Percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses using 25-gauge needles",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using 25-gauge needles to biopsy abdominal masses. Material and methods: A 6-month period of using 25-gauge needles (study group) as the only needle (n = 98) or the initial needle (n = 24) to biopsy abdominal masses was analyzed retrospectively. Diagnostic rate, sensitivity, negative predictive value, complication rate, and number of passes were compared with the same parameters obtained during the preceding 6 months during which 117 abdominal masses were biopsied and 25-gauge needles were not used (control group). There were no significant differences in patient age, gender distribution, or difficulty ratio of biopsies (path length divided by mass diameter) between the groups. Results: Diagnostic rates, sensitivities, and negative predictive values of biopsies in the study group (90.9{\%} (111/122), 91.8{\%}, (89/97), and 63.6{\%} (14/22), respectively), were not significantly different from those in the control group (91.5{\%} (107/117), 97.8{\%} (91/93), and 87.5{\%} (14/16), respectively). There were no major complications in either group; the complication rate in the control group (5.9{\%}, 6/122) was not significantly different from the study group (4.9{\%}, 7/117). Number of passes was significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group (mean values of 4.91 and 4.44, respectively, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Abdominal masses can be biopsied with 25-gauge needles, either alone or prior to larger needles, just as effectively and safely as with larger needles.",
keywords = "22 Gauge, 25 Gauge, Abdominal masses, Biopsy, Fine needle aspiration biopsy",
author = "Erturk, {Sukru Mehmet} and Stuart Silverman and Koenraad Mortele and Ramit Lamba and Kemal Tuncali and Eric Vansonnenberg and Edmund Cibas",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s00261-008-9492-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "70--74",
journal = "Abdominal Radiology",
issn = "2366-004X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses using 25-gauge needles

AU - Erturk, Sukru Mehmet

AU - Silverman, Stuart

AU - Mortele, Koenraad

AU - Lamba, Ramit

AU - Tuncali, Kemal

AU - Vansonnenberg, Eric

AU - Cibas, Edmund

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using 25-gauge needles to biopsy abdominal masses. Material and methods: A 6-month period of using 25-gauge needles (study group) as the only needle (n = 98) or the initial needle (n = 24) to biopsy abdominal masses was analyzed retrospectively. Diagnostic rate, sensitivity, negative predictive value, complication rate, and number of passes were compared with the same parameters obtained during the preceding 6 months during which 117 abdominal masses were biopsied and 25-gauge needles were not used (control group). There were no significant differences in patient age, gender distribution, or difficulty ratio of biopsies (path length divided by mass diameter) between the groups. Results: Diagnostic rates, sensitivities, and negative predictive values of biopsies in the study group (90.9% (111/122), 91.8%, (89/97), and 63.6% (14/22), respectively), were not significantly different from those in the control group (91.5% (107/117), 97.8% (91/93), and 87.5% (14/16), respectively). There were no major complications in either group; the complication rate in the control group (5.9%, 6/122) was not significantly different from the study group (4.9%, 7/117). Number of passes was significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group (mean values of 4.91 and 4.44, respectively, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Abdominal masses can be biopsied with 25-gauge needles, either alone or prior to larger needles, just as effectively and safely as with larger needles.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using 25-gauge needles to biopsy abdominal masses. Material and methods: A 6-month period of using 25-gauge needles (study group) as the only needle (n = 98) or the initial needle (n = 24) to biopsy abdominal masses was analyzed retrospectively. Diagnostic rate, sensitivity, negative predictive value, complication rate, and number of passes were compared with the same parameters obtained during the preceding 6 months during which 117 abdominal masses were biopsied and 25-gauge needles were not used (control group). There were no significant differences in patient age, gender distribution, or difficulty ratio of biopsies (path length divided by mass diameter) between the groups. Results: Diagnostic rates, sensitivities, and negative predictive values of biopsies in the study group (90.9% (111/122), 91.8%, (89/97), and 63.6% (14/22), respectively), were not significantly different from those in the control group (91.5% (107/117), 97.8% (91/93), and 87.5% (14/16), respectively). There were no major complications in either group; the complication rate in the control group (5.9%, 6/122) was not significantly different from the study group (4.9%, 7/117). Number of passes was significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group (mean values of 4.91 and 4.44, respectively, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Abdominal masses can be biopsied with 25-gauge needles, either alone or prior to larger needles, just as effectively and safely as with larger needles.

KW - 22 Gauge

KW - 25 Gauge

KW - Abdominal masses

KW - Biopsy

KW - Fine needle aspiration biopsy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76649137826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76649137826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00261-008-9492-5

DO - 10.1007/s00261-008-9492-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 19093067

AN - SCOPUS:76649137826

VL - 35

SP - 70

EP - 74

JO - Abdominal Radiology

JF - Abdominal Radiology

SN - 2366-004X

IS - 1

ER -