Perceiving individuals and groups: Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions

Joshua Susskind, Kristin Maurer, Vinita Thakkar, David L. Hamilton, Jeffrey Sherman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two experiments investigated differences in forming impressions of individual and group targets. Experiment 1 showed that when forming an impression of an individual, perceivers made more extreme trait judgments, made those judgments more quickly and with greater confidence, and recalled more information than when the impression target was a group. Experiment 2 showed that when participants were forming an impression of an individual, expectancy-inconsistent behaviors spontaneously triggered causal attributions to resolve the inconsistency; this was not the case when the impression target was a group. Results are interpreted as reflecting perceivers' a priori assumptions of unity and coherence in individual versus group targets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-191
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume76
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

attribution
target group
experiment
Group
confidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Perceiving individuals and groups : Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions. / Susskind, Joshua; Maurer, Kristin; Thakkar, Vinita; Hamilton, David L.; Sherman, Jeffrey.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 76, No. 2, 01.02.1999, p. 181-191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Susskind, Joshua ; Maurer, Kristin ; Thakkar, Vinita ; Hamilton, David L. ; Sherman, Jeffrey. / Perceiving individuals and groups : Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999 ; Vol. 76, No. 2. pp. 181-191.
@article{0c16f19c763244a2a25532607bd9e700,
title = "Perceiving individuals and groups: Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions",
abstract = "Two experiments investigated differences in forming impressions of individual and group targets. Experiment 1 showed that when forming an impression of an individual, perceivers made more extreme trait judgments, made those judgments more quickly and with greater confidence, and recalled more information than when the impression target was a group. Experiment 2 showed that when participants were forming an impression of an individual, expectancy-inconsistent behaviors spontaneously triggered causal attributions to resolve the inconsistency; this was not the case when the impression target was a group. Results are interpreted as reflecting perceivers' a priori assumptions of unity and coherence in individual versus group targets.",
author = "Joshua Susskind and Kristin Maurer and Vinita Thakkar and Hamilton, {David L.} and Jeffrey Sherman",
year = "1999",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.181",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "181--191",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceiving individuals and groups

T2 - Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions

AU - Susskind, Joshua

AU - Maurer, Kristin

AU - Thakkar, Vinita

AU - Hamilton, David L.

AU - Sherman, Jeffrey

PY - 1999/2/1

Y1 - 1999/2/1

N2 - Two experiments investigated differences in forming impressions of individual and group targets. Experiment 1 showed that when forming an impression of an individual, perceivers made more extreme trait judgments, made those judgments more quickly and with greater confidence, and recalled more information than when the impression target was a group. Experiment 2 showed that when participants were forming an impression of an individual, expectancy-inconsistent behaviors spontaneously triggered causal attributions to resolve the inconsistency; this was not the case when the impression target was a group. Results are interpreted as reflecting perceivers' a priori assumptions of unity and coherence in individual versus group targets.

AB - Two experiments investigated differences in forming impressions of individual and group targets. Experiment 1 showed that when forming an impression of an individual, perceivers made more extreme trait judgments, made those judgments more quickly and with greater confidence, and recalled more information than when the impression target was a group. Experiment 2 showed that when participants were forming an impression of an individual, expectancy-inconsistent behaviors spontaneously triggered causal attributions to resolve the inconsistency; this was not the case when the impression target was a group. Results are interpreted as reflecting perceivers' a priori assumptions of unity and coherence in individual versus group targets.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033073248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033073248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.181

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.181

M3 - Article

C2 - 10074704

AN - SCOPUS:0033073248

VL - 76

SP - 181

EP - 191

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 2

ER -