Perceived Family Criticism and Primary Care Utilization: Psychosocial and Biomedical Pathways

Kevin Fiscella, Peter Franks, Cleveland G. Shields

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We explored the relationship of perceived family criticism to subsequent healthcare utilization in patients attending a family medicine center. We examined: a) the relationship of perceived criticism to subsequent utilization for biomedical and psychosocial/somatic problems; b) the mediating effects of self-rated mental health and physical function; and c) the mediating effects of social support. The analyses were adjusted for age, sex, race, education, health insurance, and marital status. Higher perceived criticism predicted more psychosocial/somatic and biomedical visits. The relationship of perceived criticism with psychosocial/somatic visits was entirely mediated through self-rated mental health. The relationship of perceived criticism with biomedical visits was partly mediated through self-rated physical function and, in part, independent. Social support played no role in explaining these relationships. Further research is needed to determine whether lowering perceived family criticism lowers primary care utilization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-41
Number of pages17
JournalFamily Process
Volume36
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
criticism
utilization
Social Support
Mental Health
Insurance Coverage
Sex Education
Marital Status
Health Insurance
Health Status
social support
mental health
Medicine
Delivery of Health Care
marital status
Research
health insurance
medicine
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Perceived Family Criticism and Primary Care Utilization : Psychosocial and Biomedical Pathways. / Fiscella, Kevin; Franks, Peter; Shields, Cleveland G.

In: Family Process, Vol. 36, No. 1, 03.1997, p. 25-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fiscella, Kevin ; Franks, Peter ; Shields, Cleveland G. / Perceived Family Criticism and Primary Care Utilization : Psychosocial and Biomedical Pathways. In: Family Process. 1997 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 25-41.
@article{4c84ff2cae604536813a6f90eedbc5e2,
title = "Perceived Family Criticism and Primary Care Utilization: Psychosocial and Biomedical Pathways",
abstract = "We explored the relationship of perceived family criticism to subsequent healthcare utilization in patients attending a family medicine center. We examined: a) the relationship of perceived criticism to subsequent utilization for biomedical and psychosocial/somatic problems; b) the mediating effects of self-rated mental health and physical function; and c) the mediating effects of social support. The analyses were adjusted for age, sex, race, education, health insurance, and marital status. Higher perceived criticism predicted more psychosocial/somatic and biomedical visits. The relationship of perceived criticism with psychosocial/somatic visits was entirely mediated through self-rated mental health. The relationship of perceived criticism with biomedical visits was partly mediated through self-rated physical function and, in part, independent. Social support played no role in explaining these relationships. Further research is needed to determine whether lowering perceived family criticism lowers primary care utilization.",
author = "Kevin Fiscella and Peter Franks and Shields, {Cleveland G.}",
year = "1997",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "25--41",
journal = "Family Process",
issn = "0014-7370",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived Family Criticism and Primary Care Utilization

T2 - Psychosocial and Biomedical Pathways

AU - Fiscella, Kevin

AU - Franks, Peter

AU - Shields, Cleveland G.

PY - 1997/3

Y1 - 1997/3

N2 - We explored the relationship of perceived family criticism to subsequent healthcare utilization in patients attending a family medicine center. We examined: a) the relationship of perceived criticism to subsequent utilization for biomedical and psychosocial/somatic problems; b) the mediating effects of self-rated mental health and physical function; and c) the mediating effects of social support. The analyses were adjusted for age, sex, race, education, health insurance, and marital status. Higher perceived criticism predicted more psychosocial/somatic and biomedical visits. The relationship of perceived criticism with psychosocial/somatic visits was entirely mediated through self-rated mental health. The relationship of perceived criticism with biomedical visits was partly mediated through self-rated physical function and, in part, independent. Social support played no role in explaining these relationships. Further research is needed to determine whether lowering perceived family criticism lowers primary care utilization.

AB - We explored the relationship of perceived family criticism to subsequent healthcare utilization in patients attending a family medicine center. We examined: a) the relationship of perceived criticism to subsequent utilization for biomedical and psychosocial/somatic problems; b) the mediating effects of self-rated mental health and physical function; and c) the mediating effects of social support. The analyses were adjusted for age, sex, race, education, health insurance, and marital status. Higher perceived criticism predicted more psychosocial/somatic and biomedical visits. The relationship of perceived criticism with psychosocial/somatic visits was entirely mediated through self-rated mental health. The relationship of perceived criticism with biomedical visits was partly mediated through self-rated physical function and, in part, independent. Social support played no role in explaining these relationships. Further research is needed to determine whether lowering perceived family criticism lowers primary care utilization.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031085506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031085506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9189751

AN - SCOPUS:0031085506

VL - 36

SP - 25

EP - 41

JO - Family Process

JF - Family Process

SN - 0014-7370

IS - 1

ER -