Abstract
We compared effects of 0.3 Hz with 0.01 Hz settings of the high pass amplifier filter, and baseline-to-peak with peak-to-peak measurements of the P300 event-related potential. The key dependent variable of interest was intraindividual rate of accuracy in discrimination of oddball vs. frequent evoked P300 responses, in various paradigms. In Experiment 1 (a lab deception paradigm), we found that the combination of the 0.3 Hz filter setting and the peak-peak measurement of P300 correctly diagnosed oddball vs. frequent in 26 of 26 (100%) cases. This parameter combination outperformed all others. In a second, more field-like experiment (in that the participant knew that the experimenter was blind to ground truth), the peak-peak index again outperformed the base-peak index. It was also observed that the pre-stimulus EEG baseline variability exceeded that of the negative peak (NEG) following P300, i.e. the peak to which the peak-peak index refers P300 for computation. We also observed that the base-peak measurement of P300 is uncorrelated with NEG, and that NEG, seen only in 0.3 Hz channels, correlates highly (-0.67) with the duration of recovery of P300 to the pre-stimulus baseline EEG level as seen in the 0.01-Hz channel. However, in a final experiment using two simple visual and auditory oddball tasks, the base-peak measurement was as diagnostic as the peak-peak measurement.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 173-180 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | International Journal of Psychophysiology |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2001 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- P300
- P300 measurement
- P300-based deception detection
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Behavioral Neuroscience
Cite this
Peak-to-peak measurement of P300 recorded at 0.3 Hz high pass filter settings in intraindividual diagnosis : Complex vs. simple paradigms. / Soskins, Matthew; Rosenfeld, J. Peter; Niendam, Tara A.
In: International Journal of Psychophysiology, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2001, p. 173-180.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Peak-to-peak measurement of P300 recorded at 0.3 Hz high pass filter settings in intraindividual diagnosis
T2 - Complex vs. simple paradigms
AU - Soskins, Matthew
AU - Rosenfeld, J. Peter
AU - Niendam, Tara A
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - We compared effects of 0.3 Hz with 0.01 Hz settings of the high pass amplifier filter, and baseline-to-peak with peak-to-peak measurements of the P300 event-related potential. The key dependent variable of interest was intraindividual rate of accuracy in discrimination of oddball vs. frequent evoked P300 responses, in various paradigms. In Experiment 1 (a lab deception paradigm), we found that the combination of the 0.3 Hz filter setting and the peak-peak measurement of P300 correctly diagnosed oddball vs. frequent in 26 of 26 (100%) cases. This parameter combination outperformed all others. In a second, more field-like experiment (in that the participant knew that the experimenter was blind to ground truth), the peak-peak index again outperformed the base-peak index. It was also observed that the pre-stimulus EEG baseline variability exceeded that of the negative peak (NEG) following P300, i.e. the peak to which the peak-peak index refers P300 for computation. We also observed that the base-peak measurement of P300 is uncorrelated with NEG, and that NEG, seen only in 0.3 Hz channels, correlates highly (-0.67) with the duration of recovery of P300 to the pre-stimulus baseline EEG level as seen in the 0.01-Hz channel. However, in a final experiment using two simple visual and auditory oddball tasks, the base-peak measurement was as diagnostic as the peak-peak measurement.
AB - We compared effects of 0.3 Hz with 0.01 Hz settings of the high pass amplifier filter, and baseline-to-peak with peak-to-peak measurements of the P300 event-related potential. The key dependent variable of interest was intraindividual rate of accuracy in discrimination of oddball vs. frequent evoked P300 responses, in various paradigms. In Experiment 1 (a lab deception paradigm), we found that the combination of the 0.3 Hz filter setting and the peak-peak measurement of P300 correctly diagnosed oddball vs. frequent in 26 of 26 (100%) cases. This parameter combination outperformed all others. In a second, more field-like experiment (in that the participant knew that the experimenter was blind to ground truth), the peak-peak index again outperformed the base-peak index. It was also observed that the pre-stimulus EEG baseline variability exceeded that of the negative peak (NEG) following P300, i.e. the peak to which the peak-peak index refers P300 for computation. We also observed that the base-peak measurement of P300 is uncorrelated with NEG, and that NEG, seen only in 0.3 Hz channels, correlates highly (-0.67) with the duration of recovery of P300 to the pre-stimulus baseline EEG level as seen in the 0.01-Hz channel. However, in a final experiment using two simple visual and auditory oddball tasks, the base-peak measurement was as diagnostic as the peak-peak measurement.
KW - P300
KW - P300 measurement
KW - P300-based deception detection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035144920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035144920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00154-9
DO - 10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00154-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 11165356
AN - SCOPUS:0035144920
VL - 40
SP - 173
EP - 180
JO - International Journal of Psychophysiology
JF - International Journal of Psychophysiology
SN - 0167-8760
IS - 2
ER -