Patients and profits

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The thesis of the paper is that For Profit Hospitals are morally inappropriate health care delivery institutions. The thesis is established first by elaborating on the beneficent nature of medicine, hospitals, and the physician/patient relationship. The primary obligation of the physician, who draws on the resources of medicine and the hospitals, is to restore personal autonomy that is diminished by illness and suffering within the constraints of the 'canon of loyalty' that frames the physician patient relationship. Hospitals have historically played the role of facilitator enhancing a physician's ability to administer treatment. Next it is argued that For Profit Hospitals may neglect the role of facilitator. This neglect may occur given the institutions' motivations to return a profit to investors by exploiting the patient/physician relationship. This exploitation is clearly shown to be contrary to the 'canon of loyalty' that ought to exist between the patient and physician.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)93-102
Number of pages10
JournalTheoretical Medicine
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Physician-Patient Relations
Hospital Medicine
Physicians
Personal Autonomy
Aptitude
Motivation
Delivery of Health Care
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Doctor-patient relationship
  • Hospital
  • Profit-motive

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Patients and profits. / Yarborough, Mark A.

In: Theoretical Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 1, 02.1986, p. 93-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yarborough, Mark A. / Patients and profits. In: Theoretical Medicine. 1986 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 93-102.
@article{443d83ef31964ab8b285016f7fa16c6c,
title = "Patients and profits",
abstract = "The thesis of the paper is that For Profit Hospitals are morally inappropriate health care delivery institutions. The thesis is established first by elaborating on the beneficent nature of medicine, hospitals, and the physician/patient relationship. The primary obligation of the physician, who draws on the resources of medicine and the hospitals, is to restore personal autonomy that is diminished by illness and suffering within the constraints of the 'canon of loyalty' that frames the physician patient relationship. Hospitals have historically played the role of facilitator enhancing a physician's ability to administer treatment. Next it is argued that For Profit Hospitals may neglect the role of facilitator. This neglect may occur given the institutions' motivations to return a profit to investors by exploiting the patient/physician relationship. This exploitation is clearly shown to be contrary to the 'canon of loyalty' that ought to exist between the patient and physician.",
keywords = "Doctor-patient relationship, Hospital, Profit-motive",
author = "Yarborough, {Mark A}",
year = "1986",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/BF00489426",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "93--102",
journal = "Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics",
issn = "1386-7415",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients and profits

AU - Yarborough, Mark A

PY - 1986/2

Y1 - 1986/2

N2 - The thesis of the paper is that For Profit Hospitals are morally inappropriate health care delivery institutions. The thesis is established first by elaborating on the beneficent nature of medicine, hospitals, and the physician/patient relationship. The primary obligation of the physician, who draws on the resources of medicine and the hospitals, is to restore personal autonomy that is diminished by illness and suffering within the constraints of the 'canon of loyalty' that frames the physician patient relationship. Hospitals have historically played the role of facilitator enhancing a physician's ability to administer treatment. Next it is argued that For Profit Hospitals may neglect the role of facilitator. This neglect may occur given the institutions' motivations to return a profit to investors by exploiting the patient/physician relationship. This exploitation is clearly shown to be contrary to the 'canon of loyalty' that ought to exist between the patient and physician.

AB - The thesis of the paper is that For Profit Hospitals are morally inappropriate health care delivery institutions. The thesis is established first by elaborating on the beneficent nature of medicine, hospitals, and the physician/patient relationship. The primary obligation of the physician, who draws on the resources of medicine and the hospitals, is to restore personal autonomy that is diminished by illness and suffering within the constraints of the 'canon of loyalty' that frames the physician patient relationship. Hospitals have historically played the role of facilitator enhancing a physician's ability to administer treatment. Next it is argued that For Profit Hospitals may neglect the role of facilitator. This neglect may occur given the institutions' motivations to return a profit to investors by exploiting the patient/physician relationship. This exploitation is clearly shown to be contrary to the 'canon of loyalty' that ought to exist between the patient and physician.

KW - Doctor-patient relationship

KW - Hospital

KW - Profit-motive

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022671070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022671070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00489426

DO - 10.1007/BF00489426

M3 - Article

C2 - 3704961

AN - SCOPUS:0022671070

VL - 7

SP - 93

EP - 102

JO - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

JF - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

SN - 1386-7415

IS - 1

ER -