Patient safety in surgery

Martin A. Makary, J. Bryan Sexton, Julie A. Freischlag, E. Anne Millman, David Pryor, Christine Holzmueller, Peter J. Pronovost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

133 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improving patient safety is an increasing priority for surgeons and hospitals since sentinel events can be catastrophic for patients, caregivers, and institutions. Patient safety initiatives aimed at creating a safe operating room (OR) culture are increasingly being adopted, but a reliable means of measuring their impact on front-line providers does not exist. METHODS: We developed a surgery-specific safety questionnaire (SAQ) and administered it to 2769 eligible caregivers at 60 hospitals. Survey questions included the appropriateness of handling medical errors, knowledge of reporting systems, and perceptions of safety in the operating room. MANOVA and ANOVA were performed to compare safety results by hospital and by an individual's position in the OR using a composite score. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis was performed to validate the structure of the scale at the operating room level of analysis. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 77.1% (2135 of 2769), with a range of 57% to 100%. Factor analysis of the survey items demonstrated high face validity and internal consistency (α = 0.76). The safety climate scale was robust and internally consistent overall and across positions. Scores varied widely by hospital [MANOVA omnibus F (59, 1910) = 3.85, P < 0.001], but not position [ANOVA F (4, 1910) = 1.64, P = 0.16], surgeon (mean = 73.91), technician (mean = 70.26), anesthesiologist (mean = 71.57), CRNA (mean = 71.03), and nurse (mean = 70.40). The percent of respondents reporting good safety climate in each hospital ranged from 16.3% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Safety climate in surgical departments can be validly measured and varies widely among hospitals, providing the opportunity to benchmark performance. Scores on the SAQ can serve to evaluate interventions to improve patient safety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)628-632
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume243
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
Safety
Operating Rooms
Climate
Caregivers
Statistical Factor Analysis
Analysis of Variance
Benchmarking
Medical Errors
Reproducibility of Results
Nurses
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Makary, M. A., Sexton, J. B., Freischlag, J. A., Millman, E. A., Pryor, D., Holzmueller, C., & Pronovost, P. J. (2006). Patient safety in surgery. Annals of Surgery, 243(5), 628-632. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000216410.74062.0f

Patient safety in surgery. / Makary, Martin A.; Sexton, J. Bryan; Freischlag, Julie A.; Millman, E. Anne; Pryor, David; Holzmueller, Christine; Pronovost, Peter J.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 243, No. 5, 05.2006, p. 628-632.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Makary, MA, Sexton, JB, Freischlag, JA, Millman, EA, Pryor, D, Holzmueller, C & Pronovost, PJ 2006, 'Patient safety in surgery', Annals of Surgery, vol. 243, no. 5, pp. 628-632. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000216410.74062.0f
Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA, Millman EA, Pryor D, Holzmueller C et al. Patient safety in surgery. Annals of Surgery. 2006 May;243(5):628-632. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000216410.74062.0f
Makary, Martin A. ; Sexton, J. Bryan ; Freischlag, Julie A. ; Millman, E. Anne ; Pryor, David ; Holzmueller, Christine ; Pronovost, Peter J. / Patient safety in surgery. In: Annals of Surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 243, No. 5. pp. 628-632.
@article{ae1e9a8cb71c46dba2987626b2cefa07,
title = "Patient safety in surgery",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Improving patient safety is an increasing priority for surgeons and hospitals since sentinel events can be catastrophic for patients, caregivers, and institutions. Patient safety initiatives aimed at creating a safe operating room (OR) culture are increasingly being adopted, but a reliable means of measuring their impact on front-line providers does not exist. METHODS: We developed a surgery-specific safety questionnaire (SAQ) and administered it to 2769 eligible caregivers at 60 hospitals. Survey questions included the appropriateness of handling medical errors, knowledge of reporting systems, and perceptions of safety in the operating room. MANOVA and ANOVA were performed to compare safety results by hospital and by an individual's position in the OR using a composite score. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis was performed to validate the structure of the scale at the operating room level of analysis. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 77.1{\%} (2135 of 2769), with a range of 57{\%} to 100{\%}. Factor analysis of the survey items demonstrated high face validity and internal consistency (α = 0.76). The safety climate scale was robust and internally consistent overall and across positions. Scores varied widely by hospital [MANOVA omnibus F (59, 1910) = 3.85, P < 0.001], but not position [ANOVA F (4, 1910) = 1.64, P = 0.16], surgeon (mean = 73.91), technician (mean = 70.26), anesthesiologist (mean = 71.57), CRNA (mean = 71.03), and nurse (mean = 70.40). The percent of respondents reporting good safety climate in each hospital ranged from 16.3{\%} to 100{\%}. CONCLUSIONS: Safety climate in surgical departments can be validly measured and varies widely among hospitals, providing the opportunity to benchmark performance. Scores on the SAQ can serve to evaluate interventions to improve patient safety.",
author = "Makary, {Martin A.} and Sexton, {J. Bryan} and Freischlag, {Julie A.} and Millman, {E. Anne} and David Pryor and Christine Holzmueller and Pronovost, {Peter J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/01.sla.0000216410.74062.0f",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "243",
pages = "628--632",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient safety in surgery

AU - Makary, Martin A.

AU - Sexton, J. Bryan

AU - Freischlag, Julie A.

AU - Millman, E. Anne

AU - Pryor, David

AU - Holzmueller, Christine

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - BACKGROUND: Improving patient safety is an increasing priority for surgeons and hospitals since sentinel events can be catastrophic for patients, caregivers, and institutions. Patient safety initiatives aimed at creating a safe operating room (OR) culture are increasingly being adopted, but a reliable means of measuring their impact on front-line providers does not exist. METHODS: We developed a surgery-specific safety questionnaire (SAQ) and administered it to 2769 eligible caregivers at 60 hospitals. Survey questions included the appropriateness of handling medical errors, knowledge of reporting systems, and perceptions of safety in the operating room. MANOVA and ANOVA were performed to compare safety results by hospital and by an individual's position in the OR using a composite score. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis was performed to validate the structure of the scale at the operating room level of analysis. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 77.1% (2135 of 2769), with a range of 57% to 100%. Factor analysis of the survey items demonstrated high face validity and internal consistency (α = 0.76). The safety climate scale was robust and internally consistent overall and across positions. Scores varied widely by hospital [MANOVA omnibus F (59, 1910) = 3.85, P < 0.001], but not position [ANOVA F (4, 1910) = 1.64, P = 0.16], surgeon (mean = 73.91), technician (mean = 70.26), anesthesiologist (mean = 71.57), CRNA (mean = 71.03), and nurse (mean = 70.40). The percent of respondents reporting good safety climate in each hospital ranged from 16.3% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Safety climate in surgical departments can be validly measured and varies widely among hospitals, providing the opportunity to benchmark performance. Scores on the SAQ can serve to evaluate interventions to improve patient safety.

AB - BACKGROUND: Improving patient safety is an increasing priority for surgeons and hospitals since sentinel events can be catastrophic for patients, caregivers, and institutions. Patient safety initiatives aimed at creating a safe operating room (OR) culture are increasingly being adopted, but a reliable means of measuring their impact on front-line providers does not exist. METHODS: We developed a surgery-specific safety questionnaire (SAQ) and administered it to 2769 eligible caregivers at 60 hospitals. Survey questions included the appropriateness of handling medical errors, knowledge of reporting systems, and perceptions of safety in the operating room. MANOVA and ANOVA were performed to compare safety results by hospital and by an individual's position in the OR using a composite score. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis was performed to validate the structure of the scale at the operating room level of analysis. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 77.1% (2135 of 2769), with a range of 57% to 100%. Factor analysis of the survey items demonstrated high face validity and internal consistency (α = 0.76). The safety climate scale was robust and internally consistent overall and across positions. Scores varied widely by hospital [MANOVA omnibus F (59, 1910) = 3.85, P < 0.001], but not position [ANOVA F (4, 1910) = 1.64, P = 0.16], surgeon (mean = 73.91), technician (mean = 70.26), anesthesiologist (mean = 71.57), CRNA (mean = 71.03), and nurse (mean = 70.40). The percent of respondents reporting good safety climate in each hospital ranged from 16.3% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Safety climate in surgical departments can be validly measured and varies widely among hospitals, providing the opportunity to benchmark performance. Scores on the SAQ can serve to evaluate interventions to improve patient safety.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746196815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746196815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.sla.0000216410.74062.0f

DO - 10.1097/01.sla.0000216410.74062.0f

M3 - Article

C2 - 16632997

VL - 243

SP - 628

EP - 632

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 5

ER -